Pretty funny Bush/Obama comparison

He didn't get "a" warning he got dozens. I'm not making excuses for him there is nobody on this planet more than I, that thinks the US gov't is anything but incompetant.

These are the same people that you think will do a good job nationalizing healthcare.

People are such fools.


Quote from insider trading:

Bush got a warning about the attack a month before 9-11 from intelligence agencies
 
Quote from tango29:


If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have
approved?

Nah, they just kissed and held hands.
 
Quote from John_Wensink:

I'll bet my life you will never blame obama for an attack.

There will be an attack and guess what you and the lefties will say?

You will blame bush and say something like well, if we didn't have such a drain on our resources from Iraq it never would have happened.

Simple as that. You guys will never accept reponsibility, especially since the golden boy is in office.

+100
 
On May 20, 2002, David Horowitz, the Editor-in-Chief of this website, wrote an article entitled “Why Bush Is Innocent and the Democrats Are Guilty”. The article discussed Operation Bojinka, which came to the attention of U.S. authorities in 1995 when Abdul Hakim Murad, a terrorist, was captured in the Philippines. As reported by Maria Ressa in her September 18, 2001 article “U.S. Warned In 1995 Of Plot To Hijack Planes, Attack Buildings” on CNN’s website:
The FBI was warned six years ago of a terrorist plot to hijack commercial planes and slam them into the Pentagon, the CIA headquarters and other buildings, Philippine investigators told CNN.
Philippine authorities learned of the plot after a small fire in a Manila apartment, which turned out to be the hideout of Ramzi Yousef, who was later convicted for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Yousef escaped at the time, but agents caught his right-hand man, Abdul Hakim Murad, who told them a chilling tale.
Murad narrated to us about a plan by the Ramzi cell in the continental U.S. to hijack a commercial plane and ram it into the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, and also the Pentagon," said Rodolfo Mendoza, a Philippine intelligence investigator.
Philippine investigators also found evidence targeting commercial towers in San Francisco, Chicago and New York City.
They said they passed that information on to the FBI in 1995, but it's not clear what was done with it.
 
Since what you outline was known by Bush and Cheney when they took office, why didn't they take measures to secure America from an attack?

Crickets chirping...

Quote from John_Wensink:

The planning for 9/11 started under clinton, Sudan offered OBL to Clinton and he refused and the US was attacked numberous times during the clinton administration and they did nothing.

If Clinton addressed the terrorist issue during his presidency 9/11 very well may not have happened. Especially since he gutted the intellegence agencies.
 
Oh, well...since that hack right wing extremist David Horowitz wrote it, it must be true...*

Right on time there birdbrain...Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo...

*
http://mediamatters.org/research/200503160001


<img src=http://www.homedecorativeitems.com/shop/images/HHCC5_800.jpg>




Quote from John_Wensink:

On May 20, 2002, David Horowitz, the Editor-in-Chief of this website, wrote an article entitled “Why Bush Is Innocent and the Democrats Are Guilty”. The article discussed Operation Bojinka, which came to the attention of U.S. authorities in 1995 when Abdul Hakim Murad, a terrorist, was captured in the Philippines. As reported by Maria Ressa in her September 18, 2001 article “U.S. Warned In 1995 Of Plot To Hijack Planes, Attack Buildings” on CNN’s website:
The FBI was warned six years ago of a terrorist plot to hijack commercial planes and slam them into the Pentagon, the CIA headquarters and other buildings, Philippine investigators told CNN.
Philippine authorities learned of the plot after a small fire in a Manila apartment, which turned out to be the hideout of Ramzi Yousef, who was later convicted for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Yousef escaped at the time, but agents caught his right-hand man, Abdul Hakim Murad, who told them a chilling tale.
Murad narrated to us about a plan by the Ramzi cell in the continental U.S. to hijack a commercial plane and ram it into the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, and also the Pentagon," said Rodolfo Mendoza, a Philippine intelligence investigator.
Philippine investigators also found evidence targeting commercial towers in San Francisco, Chicago and New York City.
They said they passed that information on to the FBI in 1995, but it's not clear what was done with it.
 
and I never absolved them did I, nitwit?

If Clinton bore no responsibility why was sandy berger caught with documents stuffed down his pants trying to cover up clinton's culpability?





Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Since what you outline was known by Bush and Cheney when they took office, why didn't they take measures to secure America from an attack?

Crickets chirping...
 
Maybe Sandy Berger makes love to documents, I have no idea...

Nor does it matter, try another canard.

I have never absolved Clinton, but the buck stopped at Bush door when he became president, and since the right wingers claim to be superior in defending America, the failure of Bush to fix the "known mistakes" by Clinton should have been job #1.

9/11 was a failure of our security systems, but what followed 9/11, including the spying on citizens, attacking Iraq, the surge in the price of oil, etc. was all part of the Bush/Cheney plan...

The American people were so frightened like sheep that they allowed Bush/Cheney to get away with murder (figuratively if not literally)...all in the name of "protecting America."

Obama is president now for one reason and one reason alone...

George W. Bush...

Quote from John_Wensink:

and I never absolved them did I, nitwit?

If Clinton bore no responsibility why was sandy berger caught with documents stuffed down his pants trying to cover up clinton's culpability?
 
Quote from cstfx:

Nah, they just kissed and held hands.

LOL, I just don't see Bush being that way. On the other hand maybe that was what Obama wanted, as his bowing represented that he was a lesser person in comparison.
 
<img src=http://www.stolendroids.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/bush_bow.jpg>

<img src=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_j24uCNMZoG8/Sd4aXxPIsoI/AAAAAAAAIMs/V4M8UagqH50/s400/ZZ72682359.jpg>

http://www.cephasministry.com/nwo_bush_goes_to_shinto_worship.html

<img src=http://www.cephasministry.com/bush-bow.jpg>

Quote from tango29:

LOL, I just don't see Bush being that way. On the other hand maybe that was what Obama wanted, as his bowing represented that he was a lesser person in comparison.
 
Back
Top