President was "humbled" by his NPP win???

kut2k2 · Oct 9, 2009

Quote from bugscoe:

LOL! Hey dipshit, that's the definition of a truther!

"Truthers" are the people who believe the 9/11 terror attacks were an inside job. That the Bush administration had advance knowledge of them and let them occur."

Sorry, pal. You fucked up and there isn't any talking your way out of it.

You're a truther, a wacko!

BTW, do you really want to start digging up crap about who's to blame for 9/11? We can start with 2/26/93- which I'm sure you believe was another inside job.

You are a complete fuckwit. Truthers believe the Bushies had a hand in the attacks. I don't think the Bushies had advance knowledge of jackshit, that would be attributing a level of competence to them that they have never demonstrated. I just don't think they cared when or how an attack on US soil would occur. They planned to take advantage of it and use it as an excuse to invade Iraq, which was the overall goal all along.

Of course they had to do so by way of Afghanistan because the evidence said it was the Taliban who aided and abetted al-Qaeda but the Bushies managed to lie their way into Iraq eventually.

And they had fuckwit reactionaries like you cheering them on all the way. No wonder you're a complete waste of space: you're obviously dead from the neck up.

FeenixRizin · Oct 9, 2009

I'll take him at his word ...

perhaps his new found humbleness will dissuade him from the notion he can do better for the millions of individuals than they can working on their own behalf.

as for "nuclear-disarmament" ... HELL IM FOR THAT TO!

btw ... One Term.

Dr. Zhivodka · Oct 9, 2009

What is a "truther?"

Sounds like some lame Nancy Sinatra song.

Quote from bugscoe:

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a Truther in da house!

bugscoe · Oct 9, 2009

Quote from kut2k2:

I didn't say Bush caused 9/11, I said he let it happen.

Here's proof:

In January 2001, practically the same week as his inauguration, GWB was handed a bought-and-paid-for, gift-wrapped new national security plan (including anti-terrorism) called USCNS/21. It was the final output of the bipartisan Hart-Rudman Task Force on Homeland Security formed by the Clinton Administration.

All Bush had to do was implement the plan and he would have been a hero.

In their infinite arrogance, the Bushies decided to trashcan Hart-Rudman and to start all over with their own "Bush 43" anti-terrorism commission. This was in May 2001. There is no indication that the new commission, headed by Cheney, ever held a single meeting.

In August 2001, Bush receieved an intelligence briefing titled "Osama Bin Laden determined to strike within the US." Reports conflict as to whether Bush yawned during the briefing.

I am not a truther but given the grotesque incompetence and utter indifference of the Bushies towards terrorism prior to 9/11, I completely understand why truthers believe what they believe. I mean, how could a sitting US President be so blithely indifferent towards the safety of Americans? Oh yeah: he's George Bush.

Quote from kut2k2:

I don't think the Bushies had advance knowledge of jackshit

Good God. You're talking out of both sides now. Keep going, this is good stuff!

Oh, and here is some more truther info:

An alliance of 100 prominent Americans and 40 family members of those killed on 9/11 today announced the release of the 911 Truth Statement, a call for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur. The Statement supports an August 31st Zogby poll that found nearly 50% of New Yorkers believe the government had foreknowledge and âconsciously failed to act,â with 66% wanting a new 9/11 investigation.

See how that corroborates your quote on top!? Which you're now trying to claim you don't believe in from your quote on the bottom.

Truther is as truther does. Wacko!

kut2k2 · Oct 10, 2009

Quote from bugscoe:

Good God. You're talking out of both sides now. Keep going, this is good stuff!

Oh, and here is some more truther info:

An alliance of 100 prominent Americans and 40 family members of those killed on 9/11 today announced the release of the 911 Truth Statement, a call for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur. The Statement supports an August 31st Zogby poll that found nearly 50% of New Yorkers believe the government had foreknowledge and âconsciously failed to act,â with 66% wanting a new 9/11 investigation.

See how that corroborates your quote on top!? Which you're now trying to claim you don't believe in from your quote on the bottom.

Truther is as truther does. Wacko!

You really are a total dumbass so I'll try not to use too many big words.

The truthers believe the Bushies knew specifically about the 9/11 attacks: date, method, targets, etc. I don't think the Bushies knew jackshit, only that an attack would take some time and some place, because they left the country wide open. They wanted an attack to justify invading Iraq and they knew an attack was probable (especially since they ignored Hart-Rudman) but beyond that, they were content to stay ignorant and concentrate on lowering taxes for greedy corporations and raping the middle class.

For all I know, the truthers are right but it really doesn't matter because the end result is the same. Nonfeasance is just as evil as malfeasance when the miscreant knows that nonaction will result in a very bad outcome.

Madison · Oct 10, 2009

Quote from kut2k2:

How could he be worse?

Because Obama is intelligent enough to be held accountable. He understands the harm he is doing.

Bush was like giving a toddler a loaded handgun then blaming him for the consequences.

Ricter · Oct 10, 2009

Quote from Madison:

Because Obama is intelligent enough to be held accountable. He understands the harm he is doing...

"Harm" is not a given, as you've written, it is clearly debatable.

151 · Oct 10, 2009

Quote from kut2k2:

Maybe you need to become familiar with a dictionary. Look up the word "ambiguous" while you're at it, as in "'Humble' is an ambiguous word."

I did and you were wrong. Humble has a couple similar meanings none though that would apply correctly as a feeling one has when given a prestigious award.

kut2k2 · Oct 11, 2009

Quote from 151:

I did and you were wrong. Humble has a couple similar meanings none though that would apply correctly as a feeling one has when given a prestigious award.

Obama: "I am both surprised and deeply humbled."

humÂ·bled

1. To curtail or destroy the pride of; humiliate.

2. To cause to be meek or modest in spirit.

Obama was saying that he felt modest about being unexpectedly granted such a prestigious award and he recognized it was as much a call to act to deserve it as it was for past achievement.

drjekyllus · Oct 11, 2009

Quote from kut2k2:

By this time in 2001, the Bushies were already plotting to invade Iraq and were making up lies about Saddam hoarding WMDs and swapping love notes with OBL.