President Trump's Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship

It seems half of the things that I watch on social media get taken down or get tagged! It’s incredible where it’s gotten to actually that the platforms can determine what stays up in what goes down and also decide what is fact and what isn’t fact! So I am really pleased that Trump did that. I hope it’s enforceable quickly!
 
As I thought about Trump's executive order (actually his executive tantrum) to prevent tagging of his inane tweets, I realized this orange clown, along with his supporters, are hypocrites (not a new revelation).

On the one hand, they (Trump along with the $2 phony patriots, I Stand for The Flag, racists) wanted Kaepernick's head on a pike for taking a knee, but they whine, bitch, moan and complain, when Twitter tags Trumps tweets, and deletes the vile tweets of his supporters.

Hypocrisy abound...
 
Yup. So what happened to getting rid of regulations, huh?

Shoe on other foot. Hopefully he will be booted out of office.

Also yesterday watched a 2019 American Greed on Manafort. Seems he has been around since Gerald Ford days. So much for swamp draining also.

I thought Dems were the party of do as I say, not as I do. Reps these days take it to a whole nother level.
 
apdxyk said:
Is it like "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" or "Tell Vladimir that after my re-election..."?
I trust you were as indignant then as you are now. And every time a politician of this stature lies (unheard of) your heart rate and social network activity goes up.
It is not about him lying or Adam Schiff lying or Nancy lying, it's about using social media as a choke to anyone, all of us.

Besides, there is too much evidence of ballot fraud in vote-by-mail protocol.
More...

yes, "you can keep your doctor is the same as the bullshit narrative that "too much evidence over voter fraud over mail happens so let's disenfranchise hundreds of thousands"". Let's just nullify all those mail in votes from the 2016 presidential election then
Andrea Wylan said:
It seems half of the things that I watch on social media get taken down or get tagged! It’s incredible where it’s gotten to actually that the platforms can determine what stays up in what goes down and also decide what is fact and what isn’t fact! So I am really pleased that Trump did that. I hope it’s enforceable quickly!
More...
luckily this order will be halted on the 1st lawsuit brought forth
 
Andrea Wylan said:
It seems half of the things that I watch on social media get taken down or get tagged! It’s incredible where it’s gotten to actually that the platforms can determine what stays up in what goes down and also decide what is fact and what isn’t fact! So I am really pleased that Trump did that. I hope it’s enforceable quickly!
More...
Wow and you have a blog on something called enlightenedtraders. Frightening, but at the same time typical nowadays!
 
Yet another swamp occupant that is helping to "drain the swamp".

And .... "Days after Grenell’s appointment as DNI, CNN reported that his personal website had—until 2018—touted consulting work he had done for clients in Iran, China, Kazakhstan and other countries". :confused: :D
 
You cannot infuse executive power on a private company, and claim some "free speech" nonsense. The first amendment of the US Constitution does not mean you can tell a private company what they can or cannot do. It is THEIR OWN BUSINESS.

It would be like some court coming to @Baron and telling him that he must allow any form of speech on ET that is disallowed by Baron's own TOS. This, like Twitter, is a private enterprise. "Free Speech" is not guaranteed here, because this is not a fucking public space, funded by taxpayer dollars. Just like Twitter.

If I walk into your store and start cursing at everyone, I cannot claim I have a right to be there and do it on a First Amendment of the Constitution basis. I do not have a fundamental right, or granted right, to piss in your Cheerios. Because they are YOUR PRIVATE CHEERIOS.
 
Lots of of emotional comment on this page. Choosing to hate something first and find an excuse to back up that position rather than looking at the facts first then choosing the stance.

If someone else other than Trump was to introduce this executive order, it would have a resounding approval here (unless that individual loves restricted speech).

Very similar to racism, some look at the colour of the skin first then choose to hate that individual then proceed to find an excuse to back that position( or sometimes without reason).
 
Last edited:
qaz said:
Lots of of emotional comment on this page. Choosing to hate something first and find an excuse to back up that position rather than looking at the facts first then choosing the stance.

If someone else other than Trump was to introduce this executive order, it would have a resounding approval here (unless that individual loves restricted speech).

Very similar to racism, some look at the colour of the skin first then choose to hate that individual then proceed to find an excuse to back that position( or sometimes without reason).
More...
bullshit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top