President Kennedy's solution to our flawed financial system.

Quote from jem:

I had not known about this order... but
apparently its true.

Kennedy did put is on silver.
More...

And what if he had succeeded?? No more central banking system ... no more 'debt money' ... no more debt. It had been done twice before in our history with tremendous success. Now, I don't mean to imply that there has ever been a little whispring going on behind closed doors, or anything, but ... there's a small group of families who always stood to lose untold wealth and power whenever central banking systems have historically been threatened ... and I gotta ask myself ... "self" ... would I believe that these people were ok with that??? Could there have been communication between them?? I don't mean a RICO-type thing... maybe just a simple text. No intention to harm anyone over a few gazillion bucks ... or anything.
 
Quote from g222:
You’re right, you’re right. Your reference to the … conspiracy as ‘bullshit’, should in no way been interpretive of the strength of your beliefs either way. Nor should your reference to “a whole variety of evidence … that completely disproves …” cast any inferences. But … down deep … I just gotta think …
More...
My 'bullshit' description is based on factual evidence, rather than belief, as I have mentioned already. In terms of that evidence and the debunking of the conspiracy theory, I have mentioned a source. If you google G. Edward Griffin you'll find a very detailed discussion of the issue by someone who's no friend to the Fed. If you want me to give you the link, I can do so.
Your link mentions: “For conspiracy theorists, the masses are a brainwashed herd …”. Well, I think even a chartist counts on that truth now and again. The very best manipulators of the public, though, are indeed the politicians … and the very best manipulators of the politicians are the providers of the money. I could be wrong, but I think that’s more history than theory.
More...
Well, that may be the case indeed, but it's not what I am disagreeing with. I am just saying that this particular conspiracy theory is rubbish, nonsense, bollocks, etc. If you want to know why, pls see above and let me know if you want the link.
 
Quote from g222:
And what if he had succeeded?? No more central banking system ... no more 'debt money' ... no more debt. It had been done twice before in our history with tremendous success. Now, I don't mean to imply that there has ever been a little whispring going on behind closed doors, or anything, but ... there's a small group of families who always stood to lose untold wealth and power whenever central banking systems have historically been threatened ... and I gotta ask myself ... "self" ... would I believe that these people were ok with that??? Could there have been communication between them?? I don't mean a RICO-type thing... maybe just a simple text. No intention to harm anyone over a few gazillion bucks ... or anything. [/B]
More...

Said powerful families live in a fantasy land. They were born into wealth and to hell with losing it. They have enough power and wealth to protect their power and wealth.

Personally I think a sniper team should put all these families to death targeting one member at a time.
 
I love to think about Kennedy conspiracies..

It was some mob guys!! Hell yes!! It's entertaining to think about some high level mob guys sitting around when one of them says "we gotta kill Kennedy, we'll do it so high profile that nobody could miss it"... the other guys are looking at each other with eyebrows slightly raised and thinking "who gets this guys' share of the business after he's gone?"
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

[Qoute]My 'bullshit' description is based on factual evidence, rather than belief, as I have mentioned already. In terms of that evidence and the debunking of the conspiracy theory, I have mentioned a source. If you google G. Edward Griffin you'll find a very detailed discussion of the issue by someone who's no friend to the Fed. If you want me to give you the link, I can do so.[/quote]


I’ve done a ‘little’ reading about our current monetary system and its history, and along the way, have come across a couple of articles by and about Mr. Griffin. Being far from an expert on the man, I would indeed appreciate any link you could share that could shed some new light on what I’ve read thus far:


On the one hand, an article addressing his ‘conspiracy’ theory indicated a lack of definitive proof either in favor of or against the idea that 11110 had anything to do with Kennedy’s assination, concluding therefore that the ‘middle ground’ seemed the only reasonable position to take at this time.

On the other, Griffin asserted that conspiracy theorists believe that Kennedy was killed because, via eo 11110, he was going to issue silver certificates directly, looking to getting rid of the fed. He points out, however, that eo 11110 effectively did the opposite, eliminating the motive for any such conspiracy. It would therefore appear that conspiracy theorists mis-perceived the true intent of eo 11110, and thusly arrived at questionable
conclusions.


Mr. Griffin makes a good point – conspiracy theorists misunderstood what eo 11110 actually did. But he doesn’t address the consequences had … someone else … shared those same mis-perceptions at that time. Our history has recorded too many incidents where the government’s attempt to divorce itself from this European banking system has been followed by innuendos, threats and decisive action – particularly by the American bankers’ association. Their demonstrated disdain for and actions against the public would not preclude a reasonably prudent individual from suspecting their participation in so much less complicated a ‘conspiracy’ as a presidential assignation.

Please do share your link – I’m open to learn more.
 
Quote from g222:

President Kennedy recognized that our financial system was flawed. He planned to eliminate the Federal Reserve's contrived control mechanism on our future. He signed executive order 11110 as a first step.
Executive Order 11110 issued on June 4, 1963 gave the President the Authority to order the United States Treasury "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." For every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce a certificate or warehouse receipt to be used as money. This followed IMO the constitution's requirement that the government provide the medium of exchange and it follows the coinage act requirements. Basing the monetary system on silver and not gold was also very important because silver is abundant and very difficult to control.

Kennedy issued nearly $4.3 billion in U.S. notes and was introducing them into circulation, with a plan to continue until sufficient currency was in circulation to manage the flow of goods and services. The ramifications of this bill are enormous. President Kennedy was on his way to putting the Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business. When enough of his United States Notes were in circulation he would eliminate the Federal Reserve notes.

Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level. The government would not have been able to increase debt and this would have curtailed its growth.


Kennedy was assassinated just five months after installing this EO.

EO 1110 was never repealed and is still valid. If we had started or continued Kennedy's Plan the debt would be nowhere near the current level, and we would have a financial system that would increase currency levels without increasing the debt and its inflationary interest. We would escape the trap of the irreversible transfer of wealth from the debtors to the lenders giving up all our assets to the Federal Reserve.

Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to future presidents who would think to eliminate the U.S. debt by eliminating the Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. Mr. Kennedy challenged the government of money by challenging the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt - war and the creation of money by a privately owned central bank
More...

A very nice, very conservative plan. Too bad it did not take off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top