Then why in the hell is the DA talking about charges right now?
Why did the DA give the Trump org until I think it is Monday to respond to potential charges?
Preparing for Trump's Indictment
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
Why did the DA give the Trump org until I think it is Monday to respond to potential charges?
Source?
You are aware they also have to deal with every criminal prosecution in Manhattan right?
Who said the investigation had to take longer? Let me help get your train back on the track:
You posted to the effect that "recently" should not apply to four months ago (Feb.).
I reply that, in effect, an investigation can take longer, and some have taken longer. I also implied that even audits can take longer.
Now, you present us with your above odd question? Ok, here's my answer.
They are charging now, because they've investigated sufficiently to file charges.
I really don't understand what's so difficult to understand. Do you think all investigations take the same amount of time?
Source as to you being clueless? That's the only assertion I made in that post.
Source?
You infer on a regular basis that no one can have an opinion and that all knowledge can only come from propaganda.
Let me dumb it down further. I said,
My assertion is that you are clueless. And to answer your question, my sources are your posts.
Everyone can have an opinion. Opinions are rooted in sources. Or, you can say, "I just pulled my opinion out of my ass." Which is fair.
But when you state an opinion as fact, then you must back it up with a source or more. You can't just pull facts out of your ass, and think that it carries weight.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/28/trump-lawyer-manhattan-da-wont-charge-496768
Trump lawyer: Manhattan DA won't charge former president
Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance has indicated he does not currently plan to charge the Trump Organization with crimes related to allegations of "hush money" payments and real estate value manipulations, according to a personal lawyer for Donald Trump.
Ronald Fischetti, a New York attorney who represents the former president, said on Monday that in a meeting last week, he asked Vance’s team for details on charges they were considering.
widely reported that those perks included cars and apartments and appear to only involve a small number of executives.
“We asked, ‘Is there anything else?’” Fischetti told POLITICO. “They said, ‘No.’”
“It’s crazy that that’s all they had,” he added.
When asked if the meeting touched on allegations made by Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen and by adult film star and director Stormy Daniels, Fischetti replied, “Nothing. Not a word on that.”
Fischetti also said that Vance’s team told him they will not bring charges against Trump himself when the first indictment comes down.
“They just said, ‘When this indictment comes down, he won’t be charged. Our investigation is ongoing,’” he said.
Trump lawyer: Manhattan DA won't charge former president
Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance has indicated he does not currently plan to charge the Trump Organization with crimes related to allegations of "hush money" payments and real estate value manipulations, according to a personal lawyer for Donald Trump.
Ronald Fischetti, a New York attorney who represents the former president, said on Monday that in a meeting last week, he asked Vance’s team for details on charges they were considering.
widely reported that those perks included cars and apartments and appear to only involve a small number of executives.
“We asked, ‘Is there anything else?’” Fischetti told POLITICO. “They said, ‘No.’”
“It’s crazy that that’s all they had,” he added.
When asked if the meeting touched on allegations made by Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen and by adult film star and director Stormy Daniels, Fischetti replied, “Nothing. Not a word on that.”
Fischetti also said that Vance’s team told him they will not bring charges against Trump himself when the first indictment comes down.
“They just said, ‘When this indictment comes down, he won’t be charged. Our investigation is ongoing,’” he said.
You are stating an opinion as a fact. Do you have a source for that?
I do. But I'll leave the reader to take it, or leave it, as is.