PreEarnings Trade NTRI Long

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from Rearden Metal:

More memories of the Golden Age:

<img src=http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/charts/big.chart?symb=amzn&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&ma=0&maval=9&uf=0&lf=1&lf2=0&lf3=0&type=2&size=2&state=8&sid=41519&style=320&time=13&freq=2&nosettings=1&rand=5994&mocktick=1&rand=6286>

<img src=http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/charts/big.chart?symb=yhoo&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&ma=0&maval=9&uf=0&lf=1&lf2=0&lf3=0&type=2&size=2&state=8&sid=16665&style=320&time=13&freq=2&nosettings=1&rand=5325&mocktick=1&rand=1301>

<img src=http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/charts/big.chart?symb=qcom&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&ma=0&maval=9&uf=0&lf=1&lf2=0&lf3=0&type=2&size=2&state=8&sid=8267&style=320&time=13&freq=2&nosettings=1&rand=5025&mocktick=1&rand=9630>

Come to think of it, you don't even need to go back to the Golden Age to find such examples:

<img src=http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/charts/big.chart?symb=tasr&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&ma=0&maval=9&uf=0&lf=1&lf2=0&lf3=0&type=2&size=2&state=8&sid=661485&style=320&time=13&freq=2&nosettings=1&rand=652&mocktick=1&rand=1349>

Your cmgi example is correct. None of these stocks have risen 2000% in 18 months.
 
Quote from HolyGrail:

You wasted my time by posting three other stocks that did not rise 2000%

Qcom's rise was 2491.04 percent not 3000.


<i>HolyGrail has been added to your ignore list.</i>
 
I found a more recent example and posted it right after my first post about the 2000%. The point is it is rare. The point is they later fall. The point is the stock was priced to perfection, and it may not be a good idea to buy a stock up 2087% and gapping down after earnings. I guess it was more important for you to find stocks than to get the point.
 
Quote from HolyGrail:

I found a more recent example and posted it right after my first post about the 2000%. The point is it is rare. The point is they later fall. The point is the stock was priced to perfection, and it may not be a good idea to buy a stock up 2087% and gapping down after earnings.

Although you have identified a real inefficiency (investors do tend to have excessive confidence in he extension of past fundamental trends), I wouldn't consider good past results by themselves to be a sufficient condition for a short position of meaningful size.

It's also important to note that stocks - even when very overvalued - can continue to rise dramatically. XLA for example.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top