Quote from Trader666:
It's all here for anyone with a brain to see: ...
Let's look a little closer at your post...Quote from Trader666:
It's all here for anyone with a brain to see:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1401833#post1401833
Quote from Trader666:
"A Team" Approach -- Add a boatload of ADDITIONAL conditions that were not in Jack's original document and declare that the "P,V relation" works after all.
You are absolutely correct mon ami. What we do have is several posts, like this one, BY THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR might I add, that describes what types of portfolios to use. You have fabulously demonstrated what types of portfolios don't work! So, for anyone starting down the trail, it is good for them, to learn from what you did, and begin where you left off by using recommend portfolios as opposed to T6 like portfolios which gave him results like...Quote from Trader666:
For the Nth time, there's NOTHING about which portfolio to use in the original document...
Quote from cnms2:
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt" Sammuel Clemmens
Quote from Trader666:
"Sammuel Clemmens?" LOL! You'd do well to heed your own advice (that you lifted from Samuel Clemens)
But then again, you boys are experts at making fools of yourselves...
Quote from cnms2:
This proved the way your brain works: you're superficial and rigid, you see the form but don't see the content. You picked only the "mm"s, and you were content with yourself. You're a loser.
Quote from makosgu:
Let's look a little closer at your post...
Yes please note how the "A Team" Approach used ADDITIONAL conditions that Jack, the documents original author, recommended in several of his subsequent posts.
SO for redundancy...
You are absolutely correct mon ami. What we do have is several posts, like this one, BY THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR might I add, that describes what types of portfolios to use. You have fabulously demonstrated what types of portfolios don't work! So, for anyone starting down the trail, it is good for them, to learn from what you did, and begin where you left off by using recommend portfolios as opposed to T6 like portfolios which gave him results like...
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1173759>
By using the portfolios constructed from recommended conditions that were found in subsequent posts, you get an EQ curve that looks more like this...
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1361696>
Ultimately, it is up to the trader as to whether they prefer a negative EQ curve over a positive EQ curve. I always assumed most traders preferred positive EQ curves. It is hard to find an instance where a negative EQ curve is preferred. But so has been the path of T6...
To the bank, or not to the bank! That is the question... The choice is the trader's. If the trader prefers T6's EQ curve, do as he has done. If the trader does not prefer T6's EQ curve, begin where he left off or jump to the ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S RECOMMENDATION.
T666:Quote from cnms2:
T...666,
I'm sure you have a brain, and that you're convinced you're right, but so did these people too: quotes.
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt" Sammuel Clemmens (Mark Twain)
Obviously this can apply to both sides of any argument, but in this case your fervor to prove Jack wrong is a clear clue.
Cheers!
Quote from Trader666:
Well at least you admit that you're an ignorant, bootlicking toady!
Quote from cnms2:
Yep.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from Trader666:
Let me get this straight: you're so incredibly ignorant that you can't spell "Samuel" or "Clemens" and I'm a loser? You're such a fool that you're one of Jack's bootlicking toadies and I'm a loser?