Predicting is ***Unavoidable***

Quote from Trader666:

On the contrary Mr. Propaganda Minister:

1) The tests were done based on Jack's document (which I've posted several times already) and with Spyder's code from the Wealthlab site. After I posted the equity curve, you and Jack's other sycophants tried adding in conditions AFTER THE FACT that Jack had NOT listed in "Catch Up with Tomorrow’s Paper Today."

2) You didn't address the reason for my original post and instead, tried to sidestep the issue with a phoney attack on my backtests. The point I was making was your statement about not predicting directly contradicts Jack's document, Catch Up with Tomorrow’s Paper Today... Technical Analysis Used in a Manner to Anticipate the Market.

3) The poll results prove nothing and are almost certainly as inflated as claims of 3X daily range and 4% to 7% per day.

1) So how did your backtest get a different result from another backtest which used the same code? CLEARLY IT WAS YOUR INPUTS!

2) Disagree. When you have what you consider to be a complete picture of how things work, wouldn't it make sense to be prepared to time when those things occurred? So here is yet another prediction! THere will be at least a long and short trade today in the S&P futures. This prediction will be 100% accurate. This prediction is useless without timing... See 1 again!

3) And what would you suggest??? A backtest??? It will be complete in 29 years 355 days...
 
Quote from gunder12:

Live calls, just one of you to settle this for all time... why don't any of you have the balls to call live trades?

And where were you prior to March 2007 (the point at which you joined these boards)? Go check the chatroom logs. There are a few days worth around...
 
Quote from gunder12:

Oh really, a single link to one of them... just one, come on

Being that you are NEW to ET, there is a SEARCH feature in the top RIGHT. You can get started there and work your way from there... You can do most things yourself in ET. WELCOME!
 
Quote from gunder12:

Stop stalling, put up or shut up

"Seek and ye shall find". "Don't seek and ye shall not find"!

20... Your count is moving up mon frere.
 
Gunder. Keep him distracted. He's posting, not trading. And there's gonna be a BO any minute now! But his price display is blanked per orders from Jack, so he can't see it!
 
All this does is prove even more that you have no idea what you're talking about. You admit that the execution of trades is random but then claim it doesn't randomly affect price which you then "establish" with a diagram of a temporarily unchanged bid & ask! LOL! This from the one who claims to understand stochastic processes? ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Quote from makosgu:

So here AGAIN is where your logic falls apart. You see the market as random. You back off of your statement a bit by saying SOMETIMES. By sometimes, do you mean it is random 50% of the time and not random the other 50% of the time??? The execution of trades are in fact RANDOM. This is the timing of WHEN trades hit the market (ie. mutual funds, Joe Smith, day traders, etc...). In other words, executions are done RANDOMLY. However, the effect of those executions are not random. So what time series components (ie. P, ticks, V, others) did you do your analysis on? For it to be random, you would have had to assesesed that the time series was "horizontally stable". Right??? Perhaps this is why you state sometimes as in sometimes (ie. 50%) of the time you assessed the time series to be "horizontally stable".

The point is those random entry of trades hitting the market do not randomly do things. They either hit the bidsize or hit the asksize and then appear on your T&S as a record. AGAIN, I see all that you talk about and the effects of those inputs as having very non random results. I threw up this chart many moons ago of how what you don't see works (ie. randomly entered trades producing NON RANDOM changes in PRICE). Maybe you missed this material which was buried in the 2000 or so pages of posts...

So in this chart you see P at your finite resolution BID/ASK pair change by BID/ASK pair change and tick. There is an even finer resolution that is BSIZE/ASIZE that fluctuates between ticks but you probably do not use that dataset. So here, mon ami, is where we get to looking at the road in front of you. There are two series of bars in the chart. The top series of bars, is the BID and ASK. You make or lose money when the pair move, although there is a way to make money when the pair do not move but perhaps you have already figured that out. So when the BID/ASK pair change, there are precursors. Those precursors appear on the bars you see plotted BELOW the BID/ASK bars. For the ENTIRE blue region, the DOM has not changed. So all the while while you are looking at P which in my world is the BID/ASK bars, I am looking at the bars below the BID/ASK pair. This BLUE ZONE is very special as you can see something has shifted within the BID/ASK pair that is a result of all those randomly arriving trades. What is next on this chart is imminent! NOTE VERY WELL how I am not looking at P to see where P is heading. This is the whole looking out in front of the car to see when the car should be turning. But how would you have known that just looking at P??? Mon ami, so the bottom line in this whole long winded thread is that if you choose to look at the markets randomly, then by default you have to resort to probabilities. Some see the market as a very orderly (ie. non-random) place. If you choose to look at the market as a random array of inputs and outputs, then you are in the van thorpe world. However, this is by your choice. The above picture, sees how the randomly executed (in realtime) trades hit the market. Long before the BID/ASK pair changes, you have had precursors that what is about to happen is not random. JUST LOOK at the region before the circled BLUE region. It happened there too... the movement of price being related to the previous changing non price conditions of the previous moment...
 
My backtests were missing several things: lies and a need to believe.

Quote from makosgu:

So why is your virtual money of rockets different then Easyrider's real money of rockets??? Clearly, your backtests were missing something mon ami...
 
You certainly are a dedicated little Grobian groveler, aren't you? First, you AGAIN evaded answering why Jack's "Tommorrow's Paper Today" manifesto on the "P,V Boolean relation" (which is still central to his view of the markets) advocates prediction yet all of you now are saying the opposite.

As for #s 1 and 3, you could easily prove me wrong with hard PROOF of your boastful, childish claims. But I won't hold my breath waiting...

Quote from makosgu:

1) So how did your backtest get a different result from another backtest which used the same code? CLEARLY IT WAS YOUR INPUTS!

2) Disagree. When you have what you consider to be a complete picture of how things work, wouldn't it make sense to be prepared to time when those things occurred? So here is yet another prediction! THere will be at least a long and short trade today in the S&P futures. This prediction will be 100% accurate. This prediction is useless without timing... See 1 again!

3) And what would you suggest??? A backtest??? It will be complete in 29 years 355 days...
 
Back
Top