Precision

Algebraic Geometry


Hermitian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian_matrix

Holomorphic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holomorphic

Deligne
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deligne

Cohomology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohomology


If you're new to trading then the first thing you'll learn is that knowing the terminology is what seperates you from people in the know... Like anything is... You could spend countless hours trying to decipher what a single phrase is suppose to mean, but may not realize that if you break it down... Understanding the concept isn't all that difficult. The phrase above included...rather than think about what a PHD level paper has to say about it. With its Riemann surfaces, manifolds, conjectures etc... Think more about the words you're reading....

Hermitian:

Think in terms of AB=BA or AB=Tanh(AB) and so on...

Hollomorphic:

One over the other...as in...

-----------11
-------7
-----5
---3
--2

If you haven't figured it out...you can think of this in terms of time frames

Deligne:

One over the other has different weights associated with it to value it's importance in data modeling...as in

-----------*0.39285714+
-------*0.25+
-----*0.17857142+
---*0.10714285+
-- * 0.0714285

= ~1

"PRECISION"

Cohomology: The math behind joining these groups together

-----------
-------
-----
---
--


Now this was very obviously put in very simple terms...It can get far more complicated, but please keep in mind we're not trying to perform rocket science here...at least not yet.... Were trying to model data in a stable way so that our signal will be doing what the market does as things happen...


Have to get something to eat... be back shortly
 
Quote from jack hershey:

That was fun to read and use as a comparison.
More...

Interesting little diagram...Was this part of something you've been teaching before or are you trying to help clarify further the principles?.. I really made the explanation simple so the topic could be grasped first.
 
Quote from PreCap:

Interesting little diagram...Was this part of something you've been teaching before or are you trying to help clarify further the principles?.. I really made the explanation simple so the topic could be grasped first.
More...

I have always used this stuff. It was just an interesting parallel, I guess. The window was part of scoring and the "sweeps Chart" as been done many times. The static orientation you have is not my orientation and it is just a difference. You probably aren't non probabilistic either.

I certainly won't be doing any posts as being argumentative or knocking anything. It is fun to see the contrast and yields of various methods. Most of ET doesn't trade and those that do probably are in the very low yield category for loads of reasons. There is a lot of flak around here. I can understand your comments. I apologize for the intrusion.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

I have always used this stuff. It was just an interesting parallel, I guess. The window was part of scoring and the "sweeps Chart" as been done many times. The static orientation you have is not my orientation and it is just a difference. You probably aren't non probabilistic either.

I certainly won't be doing any posts as being argumentative or knocking anything. It is fun to see the contrast and yields of various methods. Most of ET doesn't trade and those that do probably are in the very low yield category for loads of reasons. There is a lot of flak around here. I can understand your comments. I apologize for the intrusion.
More...


No...no.. you're more than welcome to comment anytime... I appreciate anyone with a strong mathematics background...I actually have used both static and non-static versions of this myself with probabilistic and non probabilistic variants as well. The overall toplogy is obvously the most important concept, but if you're new to this you'd have to start somewhere.

I'd have to agree about the ET traders here...I see most of them are just trading flames back and forth:D
 
Quote from jack hershey:

The "topology" is the "carrier" of the bells and whstles.


Each program lap has to reach closure and provide the "referent context" for the next lap. Often this "status" persists.

At times of impending action, the most important thing is the pre-signal stage, the signal stage and the confirmation stage.

Drilling down into the non staionary window as the vanishing point of the decision and action occurs also means narrowing the non stationary window to the width of the actual decsion vanishing point referent status. Sufficiency and cetainty rule.

Good luck in your thread.
More...
 
Thank you for the intellectual conversation...I see where you're coming from now...When I was speaking of creating a signal, that was indeed, very simplified...I really hadn't left the topology part yet because that was still the focus...I just wanted others to understand the stateflow.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top