That's what the anti-abortion whackos are calling even the earliest stage embryos now. They'll extend it to eggs soon I guess. Then we can start punishing menstruating women. If you have a miscarriage, it's the death penalty for you.
Quote from BloodTrader:
That's what the anti-abortion whackos are calling even the earliest stage embryos now. They'll extend it to eggs soon I guess. Then we can start punishing menstruating women. If you have a miscarriage, it's the death penalty for you.
Quote from rcanfiel:
the Lord of Hosts
Quote from traderNik:
HELLO. it takes courage to defend any woman's right to choose her own destiny even if you would not knowingly endorse the termination of a pregnancy that you, as a man, had engendered. I wouldn't want any woman who got pregnant by me to have an abortion. But I have the balls and the moral compass to stand up and say that any woman can choose her own fate.
Defending freedom is hard.
Quote from traderNik:
It takes courage to defend any woman's right to choose her own destiny even if you would not knowingly endorse the termination of a pregnancy that you, as a man, had engendered.
Quote from traderNik:
The what?
Typical far-right evangelism. These are the same people who tell me that if I don't accept Jesus Christ as my personal saviour, I will burn in a lake of fire and brimstone ('the furnace will glow white hot'!!).
Ummm... HELLO. Your little religion is just one of many, faithmonger. Don't push your faith-informed views on me. It takes courage to defend any woman's right to choose her own destiny even if you would not knowingly endorse the termination of a pregnancy that you, as a man, had engendered. I wouldn't want any woman who got pregnant by me to have an abortion, faithmonger. But I have the balls and the moral compass to stand up and say that any woman can choose her own fate. It's her body and maybe she doesn't share your narrow, faith-informed radical Christian Lord-of-Hosts fundamentalist 'views'.
Defending freedom is hard. Caving in to faith-informed zealotry is so easy.
Lord of Hosts, is it? You should hook up with another ET faithmonger called ZZZzzzzzzz, who believes in some far-right Christian notion of 'Magistrates materialized out of pure potentiality'. I am sure you two could have a nice seance.
Meanwhile, take your 'views' which in 200 years will seem as logical to people of that time as witchcraft seems to us.
...errr, oops. Maybe you believe in witches as well!!
It wouldn't surprise me in the least. Ghosts and Goblins too.
Quote from Mercor:
Does a man who is the "engendered" have a choice, or can a woman simply abort every conception at will. Maybe she wants to live off the assets of a man but not commit to a family.
Seems you also need to "defend freedoms" of the man.
By the way you are also protecting the womanâs right to 2 choices.
First choice is not to avoid pregnancy, then once she "chooses" to risk pregnancy then you provide her a second choice to destroy the embryo.
Quote from traderNik:
I just wouldn't even know where to start to point out the flaws in this thinking, so I'm not going to try. Suffice it to say that you're obviously a man's man who believe that a woman's place is in the home, serving the man just like the bible says. I'm not like you; I have this weird idea that women are actually the equal of men.
Sorry, a few years ago I would have become involved here, but I don't do it anymore. rcanfiel's post just pissed me off because of it's arrogant and self-serving nature. Note his reply to me; did you expect anything different?
I'll leave you to your ministrations.