Quote from jem:
I do not think you have thought this through. You have to consider, chain of command, your duty to remain in your job for the good of the country - the power vacuum created in your absence vs. how sure your are about the outcome of a post war rebuild.
Lets say he thought there was a 70% chance the rebuild would suck.
and a 1% chance it would suck this bad - how do you weigh that against letting the neocon hawks have the only say in foreign policy.
It sort of like trading isn't it.
Uncertainty.
what you're saying applies to a soldier. it's very true from a private up to a colonel, maybe higher
but powell was the secretary of state - he wasnt even a soldier in this scenerio
does the secretary of state, a LEADER, have the responsibility or right to knowingly mislead us into war? -> NO!
all below have the responsibility to follow orders under *the assumption* that those at the top have acted morally
a secretary of state (a civilian role) NEVER has the right to midlead the public into war, not ever - i'd go as far as to call it treason
powell failed them completely