Powell does not see signs of bubbles brewing..WELL OF COURSE HE WOULD SAY THIS

It is like deja vu, from 2008. Next year will be interesting, very interesting.

Is the world currently levered with hundreds of trillions of dollars worth of toxic OTC derivatives and the underlying is about to fall off a cliff ?
 
They have no fu<King clue.




2008
2008
2008
2008



JANUARY 17, 2008 / 10:48 AM / 12 YEARS AGO
Bernanke: Fed is not forecasting a recession

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Thursday told lawmakers that even though the U.S. economy is facing a difficult combination of circumstances, the Fed is not forecasting a recession.

“The U.S. economy remains extraordinarily resilient,” the U.S. central bank chief said in answering questions after testifying before the House of Representatives Budget Committee.




https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...forecasting-a-recession-idUSWBT00818220080117

I think it was a different era.

 
- meanwhile central banks and corporations are buying like no tomorrow;

what else do you need for a big moon shot for the next 5 years?
Maybe that one is all that's needed. Wouldn't make any bets against the bull as long as this remains on the table.
 
Whether these clowns do or don't know what's up.. I don't expect them to come and openly say anything that could negatively impact the market, as they know such a statement will hasten the inevitable, cause the decline in massive 401ks, and create hysteria.

Some bearish things
-Market value to GDP is 146%
-GDP is projected to slow down into 2020 and beyond

The bullish thing
-Fed is buying $60B assets /month into 2020 Q2, and just cut rates 3 times so thank them for the recent all time highs and collapse in volatility.

They used to just do the bullish things as a reaction to a recession, but now they are actively focused on "prevention". In other words, do these things before any downturn occurs, and perhaps downturn will never happen. Unchartered territory.

Anyhow, just one man's opinion, may be wrong or right

"Market value to GDP" appears to be a nonsense stat made up by bearish people to push their agenda. US stock markets are international in flavor and derive a significant amount of their growth outside of the US. So there is no point to compare a domestic measure to the main US stock markets.
 
Last edited:
let me also repeat -

all the old metrics are meaningless in this ZIRP/NIRP environment.

once in a life time opportunity to achieve financial freedom right here.... yet people are still reading zero hedge and buying gold bars.

INDEPENDENT THINKING.. this is key.

I can't make any sense of the measure they are using in a global economy.
 
Enjoy the asset bubble while it lasts. Go out there and make loot!

The numbers don't support that there are bubbles right now in almost anything. In fact, US markets were likely more "overvalued" at times earlier in this bull market. Using the term "bubble" is highly misleading but it does appeal to the emotions of permabears at all times. We could look at how many "bubbles" have been declared on this site and note how inaccurate they are. For example, it was claimed that Toronto real estate was in a bubble in 2010 and 2011. Not true at all, and the data since confirms this over a reasonably long stretch of 9 years since.

Best you can claim is US markets are somewhat expensive at a forward P/E of 18 which could get as high as 24 if the US economic growth continues to decline as it has this year. If the economic growth goes to 1% or less, stock markets will adjust accordingly.
 
Last edited:
You and nobody else can determine the tipping point when government deficits becomes an economic problem. It may happen tomorrow.

To say at the moment"it is entirely hypothetical" is the height of voodoo economics.

Off the top of my head, the last time that any major developed-country government ran into trouble funding itself was the UK in 1976 - 43 years ago. And that wasn't something which suddenly appeared out of the blue, rather it followed a number of years of political-economic turmoil and rising inflation.

You could argue the Eurozone crisis should count (which developed over a period of several years after the GFC), but for the major economies involved (Spain and Italy) the problem wasn't deficits but rather the collapse of their banking systems combined with being stuck in the Euro.

So a US debt crisis definitely won't happen tomorrow, and is virtually certain not to happen in the next 5 years. 10 or 20 years? Maybe, but there's no evidence of it yet.
 
Off the top of my head, the last time that any major developed-country government ran into trouble funding itself was the UK in 1976 - 43 years ago. And that wasn't something which suddenly appeared out of the blue, rather it followed a number of years of political-economic turmoil and rising inflation.

You could argue the Eurozone crisis should count (which developed over a period of several years after the GFC), but for the major economies involved (Spain and Italy) the problem wasn't deficits but rather the collapse of their banking systems combined with being stuck in the Euro.

So a US debt crisis definitely won't happen tomorrow, and is virtually certain not to happen in the next 5 years. 10 or 20 years? Maybe, but there's no evidence of it yet.

Current US debt-to-GDP numbers are almost identical to Canada's numbers a few decades ago. Basically. the numbers have flipped since, and the divergence is getting worse short term as we run much smaller deficits ( on a pro rated ) basis then the US does.

My point, one I've made several times on this site, was that we rectified our issues by raising personal tax rates for somewhere between 15-20 years until the government ran a small surplus and our debt number came way down. My guess is with interest rates being so low, the US can delay such action longer then Canada could when mortgage rates were 20%, but I suspect eventually the debt issue ( plus the underfunded status of health care, old age security, etc etc ) will make higher personal tax rates inevitable. That's only a "crisis" if Americans freak out about it and refuse to pay the bill.
 
Off the top of my head, the last time that any major developed-country government ran into trouble funding itself was the UK in 1976 - 43 years ago. And that wasn't something which suddenly appeared out of the blue, rather it followed a number of years of political-economic turmoil and rising inflation.

You could argue the Eurozone crisis should count (which developed over a period of several years after the GFC), but for the major economies involved (Spain and Italy) the problem wasn't deficits but rather the collapse of their banking systems combined with being stuck in the Euro.

So a US debt crisis definitely won't happen tomorrow, and is virtually certain not to happen in the next 5 years. 10 or 20 years? Maybe, but there's no evidence of it yet.

I think what happens right now is exactly government debt crisis in US.
Government borrowing is so huge the FED had to launch emergency QE

So they openly monetize debt
Where it leads to be seen
 
Back
Top