Ok, forget about maximum drawdown, let's just use the average monthly drawdown of a winning trading system (system X). Let's say that this average monthly drawdown is 100 pips.
When system X reaches a 100 pip drawdown on any given month, would you bet even money that it will reach 200 pip drawdown before recovering from this 100 pip drawdown? Do you really think you can make money (or simply break even!) if you keep betting like that , in the long run?
If your answer is YES then I've got some excellent swamp lands to sell you in Florida.
You love shifting the goalposts and setting up straw men. Given up on your original argument I see.
How about the probability of a 120 pip drawdown for that month, then 110 the next, and 130 and so on until you go broke? Then it stays under 100 for the next 5 years.
And do enlighten us mere mortals why your fantastic 25 year back tested system with its cast iron profitability and max drawdown is now reduced to proving its viability one month at a time.
Not so cocky after a string of losses I see. Switch to selling options. It's biased to the seller, right? More guaranteed money.