Originally posted by traderman
thanks trader99 ...
from reading the various posts on these boards, it seems that many people are prop. traders at the many shops out there.
How many market makers would you say browse these boards?
On another note ... do MM conduct the same type of technical analysts as do prop. traders? Or since they trade based on order flow (as opposed to prop. traders), this type of analysis is not really necessary.
Also, why does it seem that it's easier to get a prop. trading job at one of the shops, than it is being a MM at one of the BBs?
Traderman:
Let me try to answer your question one by one then I gotta head to bed and trade tomorrow. hehe.
You wrote,"from reading the various posts on these boards, it seems that many people are prop. traders at the many shops out there. How many market makers would you say browse these boards? " I wouldn't know how many MM browse the boards?? Who would know? And why would it matter?!
You wrote,"On another note ... do MM conduct the same type of technical analysts as do prop. traders? Or since they trade based on order flow (as opposed to prop. traders), this type of analysis is not really necessary."
To put it simply NO! MM do NOT conduct any kind of TA. I mean I'm sure some of them have some kind of TA on their screens and stuff. But for the most part they just trade off of order flow. If a large institutional client has a 200,000 shares buy order , I'm sure it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where prices should be heading.. hehe.
You wrote,"Also, why does it seem that it's easier to get a prop. trading job at one of the shops, than it is being a MM at one of the BBs? "
Well, for one, most prop trading job makes you put on capital. In the case of ECHO and Bright(I'm not affliate with either), they are kinda like a souped up brokerage account where you have to take the Series 7 and you put your capital and they provide huge leverage. Well, have you ever seen Etrade or Charles Schwab decline a customer from opening an account with $?
The other prop trading model like Worldco, Schonfeld,etc. where you put up a little to nothing, and you trade the firm's capital. Their logic is that they don't know who will be a good trader so they have an open door policy.
Now as to why being an MM or any institutional trader/fund manager is so hard to get in, I think it's just traditions. Because they have always recruited at top schools and expected top grades, personality, analytical skills,etc. so it just became that way. When I was an undergrad at a top school, I thought it was all like badass or whatever to be in a BB,etc.
But once you are in it, it's just ANOTHER JOB! I repeat that. I think a lot of the people on this board want to be in BB etc. It's not that big of a deal. But since some many people want these jobs because they paid relatively decent for even new grads and easily 6figures if you have advanced degree(MBA,MS,Phd), they have to make FILTERS to select people. That's it. Just a GAME! How else would they select one candidate from another?? And because of these hoops you have to jump through, they of course have to pay you salary, bonuses, benefits,etc.
I think the best way is to do this: 1) go work for a BB or a fund company for a few years and learn the ropes etc. 2) then become independent and be a prop trader and getting most of the profits.
That's the path that I went.. IRONICALLY, Part 2) is a LOT HARDER than part 1 for ME! I did all the educational credentials and hardwork already so getting into 1) was given. But now that I want to be independent and a kickass prop trader in this tough intraday environment takes some SERIOUS efforts...
good trading to all!
-99