Possible Election Fraud in Progress

[BeautifulStranger]

I don't know what you think you are saying but you need to get a better grip on reality. You seem to want to share the blame for the bad behavior and absurd theories of you and "your side". No, you don't get to share the blame. You totally bought into Trump and his crazy entourage and even did his bidding on the "election fraud". We told you from day one there was no election fraud, and that Trump is an extreme sociopath with a history of bad behavior. Yet you made him your hero of sorts. So after 60 losing lawsuits, many of which the judges harshly rebuked the lawyers involved, we now see a Trump inspired riot in Washington and his continued refusal to leave gracefully.

Maybe you just wanted to believe in someone, but snap out of it.

You are being curiously being non specific in your response. Thinking about it further, this is understandable as you are smart enough to realize my post lays the foundation for expanded discussion of several ongoing issues involving the Left. Don’t worry, Joe Biden starts off with a clean slate in my eyes for his new job. We will start to know what Joe is truly about in the coming months.

At some point after Biden is sworn in, more details will likely come out on voting irregularities, particularly on the Democrat side. Just as likely, more details will come out on Trump’s leadership and behavior as well. However, in my opinion, there is an under-addressed showcase issue will take center stage on Biden’s inauguration day or very soon after. This controversial issue may connect a lot of the seemingly disconnected dots of recent events. Further, this issue should spur debate into many other issues involving what we want to be as a country and will likely serve as a impetus for important, if not critical, future legislation.

A skillfully addressed discussion on this issue and related matters by the new administration and the media may help us close the political divide by a degree or two. Excuse me while I look to the South and give Bugenhagen a wink.

The way we choose to frame things is not reality. The way we frame things is often a reflection on how we would like to see things. However, if we don’t consider how the other side sees things while we are hoping for their cooperation, we usually just end up spinning our gears.

Our bed will be how we choose to make it.

 

[Nine_Ender]

You are being curiously being non specific in your response. Thinking about it further, this is understandable as you are smart enough to realize my post lays the foundation for expanded discussion of several ongoing issues involving the Left. Don’t worry, Joe Biden starts off with a clean slate in my eyes for his new job. We will start to know what Joe is truly about in the coming months.

At some point after Biden is sworn in, more details will likely come out on voting irregularities, particularly on the Democrat side. Just as likely, more details will come out on Trump’s leadership and behavior as well. However, in my opinion, there is an under-addressed showcase issue will take center stage on Biden’s inauguration day or very soon after. This controversial issue may connect a lot of the seemingly disconnected dots of recent events. Further, this issue should spur debate into many other issues involving what we want to be as a country and will likely serve as a impetus for important, if not critical, future legislation.

A skillfully addressed discussion on this issue and related matters by the new administration and the media may help us close the political divide by a degree or two. Excuse me while I look to the South and give Bugenhagen a wink.

The way we choose to frame things is not reality. The way we frame things is often a reflection on how we would like to see things. However, if we don’t consider how the other side sees things while we are hoping for their cooperation, we usually just end up spinning our gears.

Our bed will be how we choose to make it.

You remain delusional and long winded in your approach here. I was very specific in what I said but something in that mind of yours refuses to see reality for what it is. There was no election fraud. I have no idea what it would take before you would realize this.

 

[BeautifulStranger]

I have no idea what it would take before you would realize this.

You are joking, right? I, as well as tens of millions of other Trump supporters, simply want an explanation for the scores of election irregularities seen in several states and to hear from witnesses that are probably numbering in the hundreds by now that include poll watchers, experts, and even election officials.

A timely trial would have been nice, but information will continue to flow in spite of massive media censorship. This information will reach new families, neighbors, co-workers, friends and so on, slowly and surely. This information will likely be one sided, which is why a trial involving rules of evidence, sworn witness testimony under examination and cross examination would have been best.

Of course, there is the impending issue I’ve mentioned in my previous post that may fully explain why things are happening the way they are.

Then again, it may be as simple as key Democrats afraid of risking an open trial into election irregularities. What’s that you say, the Trump Campaign is 1 of 60, or whatever, in court cases? Most, if not all, of these rulings were not the result of a completed trial involving actual witness testimony. In other words, most ruling were based on legal technicalities rather than addressing the actual merit of each case.

Tens of millions of voters are entitled to transparency and will not likely rest until they get it.

As it should be.

 

[Nine_Ender]

You are joking, right? I, as well as tens of millions of other Trump supporters, simply want an explanation for the scores of election irregularities seen in several states and to hear from witnesses that are probably numbering in the hundreds by now that include poll watchers, experts, and even election officials.

A timely trial would have been nice, but information will continue to flow in spite of massive media censorship. This information will reach new families, neighbors, co-workers, friends and so on, slowly and surely. This information will likely be one sided, which is why a trial involving rules of evidence, sworn witness testimony under examination and cross examination would have been best.

Of course, there is the impending issue I’ve mentioned in my previous post that may fully explain why things are happening the way they are.

Then again, it may be as simple as key Democrats afraid of risking an open trial into election irregularities. What’s that you say, the Trump Campaign is 1 of 60, or whatever, in court cases? Most, if not all, of these rulings were not the result of a completed trial involving actual witness testimony. In other words, most ruling were based on legal technicalities rather than addressing the actual merit of each case.

Tens of millions of voters are entitled to transparency and will not likely rest until they get it.

As it should be.

Such deep, deep delusion is astonishing really. Reminds me of the America mentality before you invaded Iraq. How well did that turn out ?

You know what explains everything that happened ? There was no election fraud. It's that simple.

 

[Tony Stark]

You are joking, right? I, as well as tens of millions of other Trump supporters, simply want an explanation for the scores of election irregularities seen in several states and to hear from witnesses that are probably numbering in the hundreds by now that include poll watchers, experts, and even election officials.

A timely trial would have been nice, but information will continue to flow in spite of massive media censorship. This information will reach new families, neighbors, co-workers, friends and so on, slowly and surely. This information will likely be one sided, which is why a trial involving rules of evidence, sworn witness testimony under examination and cross examination would have been best.

Of course, there is the impending issue I’ve mentioned in my previous post that may fully explain why things are happening the way they are.

Then again, it may be as simple as key Democrats afraid of risking an open trial into election irregularities. What’s that you say, the Trump Campaign is 1 of 60, or whatever, in court cases? Most, if not all, of these rulings were not the result of a completed trial involving actual witness testimony. In other words, most ruling were based on legal technicalities rather than addressing the actual merit of each case.

Tens of millions of voters are entitled to transparency and will not likely rest until they get it.

As it should be.

The Attorney General and FBI said there was no fraud that would overturn the election.The Top election guy said this was the most secure election ever.Republican state officials have said there was no fraud in their elections.Over 50 courts has said Trump has no case.

 

[easymon1]

The Top election guy said this was the most secure election ever.

Trust but Verify.

For reasons such as this, it only makes sense to conduct a comprehensive forensic analysis into a representative sample of the strange events surrounding this election.
Professionally derived conclusions will resolve much uncertainty whether for the pubs OR the dems.

 

[easymon1]

You are in effect requiring that all

No such thing.

For reasons such as this, it only makes sense to conduct a comprehensive forensic analysis into a representative sample of the strange events surrounding this election.
Professionally derived conclusions will resolve much uncertainty whether for the pubs OR the dems.

Let the Data Speak.

 

[Tony Stark]

Trust but Verify.

Attorney General and FBI did.

 

[El OchoCinco]

millions of delusional people are not entitled to anything when rational courts of law and lawyers and government officials have already decided this...

If millions of delusional people demand the military prove there are no aliens in captivity are you saying the people have a right to storm military bases until they are proven wrong?

 

[easymon1]

Attorney General and FBI did.

Opinion.
Let the Data Speak.