Possible Election Fraud in Progress

virtusa said:
If there is no proof at all, or all "proof" was rejected as irrelevant, we don't need hearings.
More...
There wouldn't be any way to tell if the evidence was strong or not without a hearing. Judges have simply thrown cases out on false technicalities, not on merit. Get with the program. ---Until you stipulate that there was massive fraud and that the election is being stolen from Trump, there can be no further discussion.
 
@virtusa
Buy1Sell2 said:
There wouldn't be any way to tell if the evidence was strong or not without a hearing. Judges have simply thrown cases out on false technicalities, not on merit. Get with the program. ---Until you stipulate that there was massive fraud and that the election is being stolen from Trump, there can be no further discussion.
More...
LOL ... "no discussion unless you agree to agree with me first." LMMFAO!!
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
There wouldn't be any way to tell if the evidence was strong or not without a hearing. Judges have simply thrown cases out on false technicalities, not on merit. Get with the program. ---Until you stipulate that there was massive fraud and that the election is being stolen from Trump, there can be no further discussion.
More...

Several cases went like this:

There was many times a pre-hearing. Judges asked then a few questions to check the credibility of the witness, or the proof.
There were cases were the witness didn't even understand the most basic rules of the procedures.
There was also "spiderman" who was an IT expert, but appeared to be a car mechanic.

There was even a lawyer who had to admit that the claim he had to defend was fake. The case where observers were not allowed in the building and the judge found out that it was not correct. Reality was that the maximum number of Republican observers were in and they wanted to bring more observers in, which was forbidden by the rules.

That's what happens when people focus on the reward and not on the claim. Some money do anything for money.
 
What I've heard is that precincts that used a particular voting machine registered 3 to 5 percent more votes for Biden than other precincts.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
What I've heard is that precincts that used a particular voting machine registered 3 to 5 percent more votes for Biden than other precincts.
More...

If you are part of the Trump world you hear that all the time.

In the real world you will not hear that. You know, in the world were they have judges and Courts instead of gurus.

Trump tried to do in the US what Putin did in Russia. Unfortunatelly Putin is much smarter than Trump. Even meeting Putin to get new instructions did not help.
Trump did not want any US citizen around at this chat with Putin.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/15/us/politics/trump-putin-meetings.html
 
Last edited:
FB_IMG_1609784518943.jpg
 
Dominion plans to sue Sidney Powell, doesn't rule out Trump
https://www.axios.com/dominion-defa...ump-5e8530bc-a6ff-4feb-badd-d617eccdabfa.html

Dominion Voting Systems plans to sue attorney Sidney Powell "imminently" for defamation, and it's continuing to explore similar suits against President Trump and others, company founder and CEO John Poulos told the Axios Re:Cap podcast on Monday.

Between the lines: Dominion, which makes the voting machines used in Georgia and elsewhere, has been the subject of baseless accusations of malfeasance during last November's elections.
  • Trump, during his leaked call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, called the U.S.-based company "corrupt" and had to be corrected by Raffensperger after claiming machines had been recently removed and/or altered by Dominion employees.
  • Dominion says that the rhetorical barrage has led to death threats against its employees, including one who remains unable to return to his home.
(Audio podcast at above link)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top