One of the things that Idiot Leftists don't get is that a recount is meaningless when you're recounting fraudulent ballots. I would expect recounts and original counts to be similar in value.
Possible Election Fraud in Progress
- Thread starter BeautifulStranger
- Start date
Here's a very interesting look at the votes for President and for Senate in the state of Georgia. While not 100 percent proof of fraud, it is typical of what you would see in a situation where fraudulent ballots have been cast
You'll notice that there is a very close correlation in the numbers for Trump and Perdue, yet 100k difference between Biden and Ossoff. In addition, the total number votes for president was 46,000 more than the total number of votes for the Senate race. ----How convenient---
You'll notice that there is a very close correlation in the numbers for Trump and Perdue, yet 100k difference between Biden and Ossoff. In addition, the total number votes for president was 46,000 more than the total number of votes for the Senate race. ----How convenient---
There was a somewhat similar occurrence in the Senate special election in Georgia as well where the Republican candidates combined were close to Trump's total --about 35k less than Trump. Yet, the Idiot Dem candidates combined were a full 96k fewer than Biden. The total number of votes in the special senate election was 84k fewer than cast in the presidential election. ---Classic footprints of fraud.---
Why are you a US Supreme Court justice? Only idiots like you assume you know what the US Supreme Court will do with the various lawsuits which have not even gotten to them? And evidence is plentiful with hundreds of sworn affidavits, whistleblowers, statistical anomalies indicating widespread fraud and maybe, even asking the US Supreme Court to seize the Dominion Voting Systems machines so that, experts can completely, examine them. We are just getting started on this.
Republican governors, elected by majorities of conservatives in their states, have publicly stated that their states' elections were free and fair, some going so far to say the most fair election ever. Even the state of Texas has offered $1 million to anyone there offering evidence of fraud, and that state can damn well afford it.
Don't paint yourself into a "stab in the back" corner.
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/30/opinion/trump-conspiracy-germany-1918.html">Dolchstosslegende</a>
Hmm.
Don't paint yourself into a "stab in the back" corner.
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/30/opinion/trump-conspiracy-germany-1918.html">Dolchstosslegende</a>
Hmm.
Last edited:
Exactly. I heard this driver narrate what happened. They would not give him paperwork to even acknowledge that he did his job in the hours he was there waiting, not counting overtime. Only to be told by a USPS supervisor to drive his truck to a location. His rig vanished when he came to get it the next day.
Today in the New York Times: This is the real Donald Trump.Most corrupt President ever in American history.
US investigation of alleged bribery in exchange for presidential pardon
The United States Department of Justice is investigating a possible crime in which money was funneled into the White House in exchange for a presidential pardon decision. This is stated in legal documents that have been made available to a federal court. On Tuesday, he released an order with many black painted passages, ordering an investigation into “bribery in exchange for pardon”.
About half of the 18-page document is painted black. The public version contains few details and no names of those involved in the case. The document states that multiple prosecutors in the capital, Washington, D.C. say they have evidence of a bribe system whereby someone "would offer a substantial political donation in exchange for a presidential pardon or decision to postpone a sentence." The document also states that prosecutors are investigating a "secret lobby plan" in which two strangers "acted as lobbyists for senior White House officials without complying with legal registration requirements."
Presidents can largely determine whom they wish to pardon under the US Constitution. A pardon decision of a sitting president exempts anyone from prosecution under federal criminal law. Criminal proceedings under the law of individual states, however, are beyond the scope of such a decision.
Trump last week pardoned his former adviser Michael Flynn, who twice lied to the federal police department FBI when it investigated Russian interference in the 2016 US election. It was the first pardon decision in an expected series of similar decisions during the final weeks of Trump's tenure.
Earlier, Trump's former political assistant Roger Stone, who had been convicted of seven crimes, including making false statements to a parliamentary committee and attempting to influence a witness, was pardoned by the president. According to the court order, the Department of Justice has urged the judge not to disclose that an investigation is underway, because the investigation would concern “individuals and behavior” not yet charged. The United States Department of Justice emphasizes that there is no investigation or investigation of government officials in connection with the possible bribery scandal.
Pardon for children Trump is also said to have spoken with advisers about the preventive pardon of his children Donald junior (42), Ivanka (39) and Eric (36) and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani. The New York Times reports this on the basis of two insiders. Trump is also said to have spoken to Giuliani about it last week.
With this, the president would like to cut off any charges from the Justice Department after his resignation. Donald Jr.'s corridors were previously checked by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller, who investigated alleged conspiracy between Trump's campaign team and Russia in 2016. Trump's son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner lied to federal authorities about his contacts with foreigners to access classified information.
Why President Trump is concerned about his children Ivanka and Eric is unclear, although a Manhattan prosecutor is investigating the Trumps' family business, in which the two also have functions. The source of the threat to New York lawyer and former mayor Rudy Giuliani is also unclear. He was previously investigated by prosecutors for his cases in Ukraine and his role in the dismissal of the US ambassador to Kiev, Marie Yovanovitch. That affair was central to the impeachment case against Trump this spring.
US investigation of alleged bribery in exchange for presidential pardon
The United States Department of Justice is investigating a possible crime in which money was funneled into the White House in exchange for a presidential pardon decision. This is stated in legal documents that have been made available to a federal court. On Tuesday, he released an order with many black painted passages, ordering an investigation into “bribery in exchange for pardon”.
About half of the 18-page document is painted black. The public version contains few details and no names of those involved in the case. The document states that multiple prosecutors in the capital, Washington, D.C. say they have evidence of a bribe system whereby someone "would offer a substantial political donation in exchange for a presidential pardon or decision to postpone a sentence." The document also states that prosecutors are investigating a "secret lobby plan" in which two strangers "acted as lobbyists for senior White House officials without complying with legal registration requirements."
Presidents can largely determine whom they wish to pardon under the US Constitution. A pardon decision of a sitting president exempts anyone from prosecution under federal criminal law. Criminal proceedings under the law of individual states, however, are beyond the scope of such a decision.
Trump last week pardoned his former adviser Michael Flynn, who twice lied to the federal police department FBI when it investigated Russian interference in the 2016 US election. It was the first pardon decision in an expected series of similar decisions during the final weeks of Trump's tenure.
Earlier, Trump's former political assistant Roger Stone, who had been convicted of seven crimes, including making false statements to a parliamentary committee and attempting to influence a witness, was pardoned by the president. According to the court order, the Department of Justice has urged the judge not to disclose that an investigation is underway, because the investigation would concern “individuals and behavior” not yet charged. The United States Department of Justice emphasizes that there is no investigation or investigation of government officials in connection with the possible bribery scandal.
Pardon for children Trump is also said to have spoken with advisers about the preventive pardon of his children Donald junior (42), Ivanka (39) and Eric (36) and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani. The New York Times reports this on the basis of two insiders. Trump is also said to have spoken to Giuliani about it last week.
With this, the president would like to cut off any charges from the Justice Department after his resignation. Donald Jr.'s corridors were previously checked by Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller, who investigated alleged conspiracy between Trump's campaign team and Russia in 2016. Trump's son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner lied to federal authorities about his contacts with foreigners to access classified information.
Why President Trump is concerned about his children Ivanka and Eric is unclear, although a Manhattan prosecutor is investigating the Trumps' family business, in which the two also have functions. The source of the threat to New York lawyer and former mayor Rudy Giuliani is also unclear. He was previously investigated by prosecutors for his cases in Ukraine and his role in the dismissal of the US ambassador to Kiev, Marie Yovanovitch. That affair was central to the impeachment case against Trump this spring.
As a truck driver who has hauled loads through my carrier for other carriers, such as UPS, Fedex, DHL, and others, I can offer some background behind what this driver is saying. Five points comes to mind that may corroborate this driver’s points or not, either increasing or diminishing his credibility.
The relevant points are:
1. “Tickets” or “Sheets” are a fundamental part of the client’s paperwork, whether it is UPS, Fedex, and others. These tickets list the basic information of the load including in and out times, the details of the load including quantity of containers or pallets, the signature of the driver, the employee verifying the load and seal, and the signature of the person accepting delivery of the load. There is also a computer record associated with this client generated ticket. I actually have a copy of a ticket from DHL I’m looking at now.
2. Depending on the policy of the direct carrier, either these tickets are used as a Bill of Lading, or more often, for legal protection, the carrier’s bill of lading (BOL) is required by the carrier agreeing to transport the shipment. This BOL will include terms of service, terms of cargo insurance, and other details related to the shipment. The BOL provides the legal basis for a carrier to get paid for transporting freight.
3. Hours of service requirements, whether using electronic or paper logs require the BOL number to be entered. Given the age and apparent experience level of this driver, and assuming his electronic logging device was working correctly, it is unlikely this driver has an exception from regulations that require the use of electronic logs. Therefore, electronic logs were probably used. The electronic logging program I use will not let you submit finished logs without the BOL number entered.
4. Proof of delivery in the form of a carrier or customer signed BOL and in the case of extra services performed, a separate accessorials form, is signed and submitted to the carrier for billing and payment. Getting the signature of the party receiving the shipment is so fundamental to the delivery process, it is almost never contested by the receiver, even in the case of cargo damage. The only exceptions would be along the lines of wrong delivery address. Even in cases of the right delivery address but an actual load refusal, a signature with printed name along with an appropriate notation would be obtained. In any event, such as situation the driver described would require the driver to call his dispatch, regardless of day of week or time of time before leaving that location.
5. Electronic logging devices automatically record the time the vehicle is in motion and when it is not. When the driver is not driving, he inputs the appropriate status of duty such as on duty - pretrip inspection, on duty - loading, on duty - unloading, off duty, and sleeper berth. The carrier must maintain each driver’s hour of service records for legal and audit compliance for at least 6 months, I believe.
The information this driver has relayed should be discussed further and cross referenced with legally required records to determine the ultimate value of his statements concerning possible election fraud involving the distribution physical ballots. Another area to review is the normal distribution patterns of intrastate mail for each state in question.
Edit: Came across a UPS ticket for a delivery I’ve been involved in. Although delivery is authorized without obtaining a signature should no UPS employee be on site, whenever an employee is on site a signature from a “Destination dispatcher” is always obtained.
Last edited: