Possible Election Fraud in Progress

BeautifulStranger said:
To actually prove fraud, you need to have a trial, where evidence is validated and presented, witnesses give testimony and are cross examined, legal arguments made, and a judge rules accordingly to the preponderence of evidence, as in a civil based, election related, trial.

Could the fear of the Trump campaign presenting a preponderence of evidence indicating election fraud and requiring appropriate relief be the real reason why various courts will not allow credible witnesses to be heard? Or is it just imcompetence or sabotage by Trump attorneys? The indications of election fraud are there. The real reason why witnesses are not allowed to be heard in court are less clear. Whatever is truly going on, until the indications of election fraud are addressed, this election will remain tainted and massive distrust of Democrats by non Democrats will remain at highest possible levels, possiblly creating low tolerance or even serious “Civil disobedience” issues with unpopular Biden policies.

Seems to me, the best course of action is to let these witnesses be heard in open court and let the chips fall as they may, even it if ultimately results in another 4 years of Trump. Of course, should the Trump Campaign fail to prove their case, the credibility of Democrats increases and Biden would able to be a more effective President with a more unified populace. Isn’t this worth the effort for some transparency? Or is transparency something to be feared by Democrats?
More...

Name a witness that was not allowed.
 
BeautifulStranger said:
To actually prove fraud, you need to have a trial, where evidence is validated and presented, witnesses give testimony and are cross examined, legal arguments made, and a judge rules accordingly to the preponderence of evidence, as in a civil based, election related, trial.

Could the fear of the Trump campaign presenting a preponderence of evidence indicating election fraud and requiring appropriate relief be the real reason why various courts will not allow credible witnesses to be heard? Or is it just imcompetence or sabotage by Trump attorneys? The indications of election fraud are there. The real reason why witnesses are not allowed to be heard in court are less clear. Whatever is truly going on, until the indications of election fraud are addressed, this election will remain tainted and massive distrust of Democrats by non Democrats will remain at highest possible levels, possiblly creating low tolerance or even serious “Civil disobedience” issues with unpopular Biden policies.

Seems to me, the best course of action is to let these witnesses be heard in open court and let the chips fall as they may, even it if ultimately results in another 4 years of Trump. Of course, should the Trump Campaign fail to prove their case, the credibility of Democrats increases and Biden would able to be a more effective President with a more unified populace. Isn’t this worth the effort for some transparency? Or is transparency something to be feared by Democrats?
More...
The problem is that no witnesses have been allowed in these cases yet. There are plenty of them, but judge after judge denies discovery.
 
BeautifulStranger said:
Name a witness that was. I would love to obtain a transcipt of some of these court proceedings. Any ideas?
More...

Which witness was named in a court proceeding that wasn't allowed to testify?

Trump legal team isn't alleging fraud in courts, only in public hearings organized at hotels where Trump supporters make up stories about extraordinary things they saw but won't say under oath.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
The problem is that no witnesses have been allowed in these cases yet. There are plenty of them, but judge after judge denies discovery.
More...
You OBVIOUSLY don't understand how it works ... but please continue, ... it's cute.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top