Possible Election Fraud in Progress

gwb-trading said:
Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, is not an electronic voting expert. He is a fraud. This has already been documented.

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...fraud-in-progress.352166/page-92#post-5262597
More...

This electronic voting system expert may not have all the credentials of the top experts, but how does that make him a fraud? Further, what about the evidence of election fraud itself? Ultimately, any action a court might take will be based on the evidence itself, not what the attorney’s grades were, for example, in college, or whatever.

In addition, there are other electronic voting system experts, including one who has top credentials who actually conducted an investigation on a stolen 2018 Congressional Election such as shown in this video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/scUpSRkNoJ9g/


Wikipedia.org has several articles on the 2020 US Presidential election. Although some of these articles seem to lean Left, they are well sourced as indicated by links at the bottom of these articles. Those who have an inclination to become more informed on what is actually happening in the election would do well to start there and possibly contact, or better yet, visit representatives from both sides. There is nothing like meeting someone in person when trying to ascertain the integrity of their position. Body language, tonal inflection, and speech cadence in response to questions or statements represents the majority of communication. Which side seems to try obscure transparency? Which side seems defensive? Which side seems more paranoid? Which side seems to consider themself as a “King or Queen”, rather than a public servant?

The only true way to find what really is going on is to get out there and talk to Representatives from each political party.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
Here's a single piece of evidence that proves fraud in PA. ---The state sent out 1.8 million mail-in ballots in 2020, yet counted 2.5 million mail-in ballots cast. Folks, that is 100 percent proof of massive fraud.
More...
That's not true, And you can not produces any evidence of such. Just saying it is true is not evidence. But you're a fool, and fools are fools because they have lost touch with their fallibility.

If it were true, courts would have stayed the PA certification. But they didn't, and what does that tell you? Nothing of course. But to those who recognize their own fallibility, it immediately tells them there is no truth in those reports.
 
piezoe said:
That's not true, And you can not produces any evidence of such. Just saying it is true is not evidence. But you're a fool, and fools are fools because they have lost touch with their fallibility.

If it were true, courts would have stayed the PA certification. But they didn't, and what does that tell you? Nothing of course. But to those who recognize their own fallibility it immediately tells them there is no truth in those reports.
More...
Courts didn't stay the PA certification because the judge did not allow discovery and thus no evidence was allowed to be presented. The Giuliani strategy on the court side is to get this moved as quickly as possible to The Supreme Court, so the lower courts are likely helping him, not hurting him.
 
easymon1 said:
Common sense doesn't need a whole lot of background, lol
More...
Ha ha ha. You've posted a lot of dumb stuff. The ET Politics Forum specializes in dumb stuff. But now, with that remark, you've even surpassed yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top