Possible Election Fraud in Progress

Again, no. The affidavits to date have failed to deliver anything close to plausible or meritorious. I challenge you to show one affidavit that creates a basis for a legitimate legal complaint. I’m only asking for one.

Trump’s lawyers are basically saying Joe Biden’s win is in itself proof of fraud because Trump’s ego is hurt.

See for yourself. With your own eyes. Order the transcripts of the relevant PA Legislative hearing or look at the videos. Order the transcripts or view the video of an interview of an election systems expert who was orginally hired to investigate a stolen 2018 Congressional race in Texas against a Republican incumbent. Read the 209 or so counts on a complaint alleging election fraud. Here are some links for you the get started:


Below is the three plus hour PA hearing. If YouTube is not working properly, contact the PA legistlature. They had Zoom up and may have transcripts.


The next three videos, which had to be put on bitchute because of YouTube censoring, are the interviews of an electronic voting expert. Excellent background information for those who want to understand how electronic voting works and its vulnerabilities. Consider asking for transcipts for redundant archival reasons.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/scUpSRkNoJ9g/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/CURgEq74cSuL/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/CjAuMkG5s2Me/


The final link is a *.pdf file showing the Trump campaign’s complaints in GA, but probably similar to compliants filed in other states.
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf
 
Find a source from a main stream news site rather than the twisted fringe pushing this.

Navid Keshavarz-Nia does not even have a LinkedIn profile. He has one published work in 2011 which was his dissertation. His one man firm, Black Key Solutions, ran out of his house appears to earn a mere $148K per year. He tries to sell himself as an expert security speaker -- yet he has been invited to only one security conference in 2017 over the past decade. Yet he claims to have 30 years vice president and senior director in INFOSEC (Information Security)--- yet can't name a single company he has worked for -- beyond his consulting firm. The guy is a self-pumped up nobody with a questionable "resume".

The claims made in his affidavit don't even rise to the minimum acceptable evidence for information security assertions. No proper details. No proper technology terms describing his "proof".

Lol, NYTimes apparently has no qualms with the good Dr.

Only online trolls.

We’ll see where this ends.
 
You know what they say about someone who continually does the same thing but expects a different result, right?

Yes, that would be your pointless quest to find real evidence of election fraud. There isn't a court in the land that agrees with your ideas here. It's not me in the wrong here, it's you. You don't seem to understand that the default position is that there was a fair election. It is up to you to prove otherwise, and you haven't. Nobody has. Almost every single legal attempt has failed and often the judges have dismissed Trump's team with rather obvious undertones ( basically why are you wasting my time with this shit you have no evidence ).
 
See for yourself. With your own eyes. Order the transcripts of the relevant PA Legislative hearing or look at the videos.f

There was no 'legislative' hearing, the 'hearing' was held at a hotel with only Republicans attending.

You right wingers are a joke at this point.

Keep crying, your coping is beautiful.
 
See for yourself. With your own eyes. Order the transcripts of the relevant PA Legislative hearing or look at the videos. Order the transcripts or view the video of an interview of an election systems expert who was orginally hired to investigate a stolen 2018 Congressional race in Texas against a Republican incumbent. Read the 209 or so counts on a complaint alleging election fraud. Here are some links for you the get started:


Below is the three plus hour PA hearing. If YouTube is not working properly, contact the PA legistlature. They had Zoom up and may have transcripts.


The next three videos, which had to be put on bitchute because of YouTube censoring, are the interviews of an electronic voting expert. Excellent background information for those who want to understand how electronic voting works and its vulnerabilities. Consider asking for transcipts for redundant archival reasons.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/scUpSRkNoJ9g/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/CURgEq74cSuL/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/CjAuMkG5s2Me/


The final link is a *.pdf file showing the Trump campaign’s complaints in GA, but probably similar to compliants filed in other states.
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

Again, you have given me links to crazy people alleging fraud. Fraud is a crime, you need evidence. People making claims is not good enough to substantiate fraud.

I don’t understand how you’re not embarrassed to be 1. Associated with these obviously outrageous claims and 2. So ignorant of the law.

If you are actually interested in the litigation and it’s movement through the courts below you will find a link that will let you read the actual complaints, rulings, motions and appeals.

My advice to you is to separate what you’re consuming in the media from what is going on in court because of what you’re consuming even had a little bit of truth to it, it would show up in the complaints. Does that make any sense to you?

And what’s even beyond that is not only does this dominion nonsense not make the cut for what Trump is filing in court, and trust me it’s a very low standard for what they are filing, what Trump’s lawyers are filing in court is being laughed out of the courtroom.

Anyway, it’s red pill, blue pill time for you. You can actually see what is being alleged in court or stay in your right wing media safe space.

https://www.democracydocket.com/
 
Lol, NYTimes apparently has no qualms with the good Dr.

Only online trolls.

We’ll see where this ends.

A single mention in an opinion column is an endorsement by the mighty NYTimes.

Who knew that guys like you who constantly quote Breitbart and WND are fans of NYTimes now just because it suits your coping agenda.

Cope harder loser, you lost, get over it.
 
Again, you have given me links to crazy people alleging fraud. Fraud is a crime, you need evidence. People making claims is not good enough to substantiate fraud.

I don’t understand how you’re not embarrassed to be 1. Associated with these obviously outrageous claims and 2. So ignorant of the law.

If you are actually interested in the litigation and it’s movement through the courts below you will find a link that will let you read the actual complaints, rulings, motions and appeals.

My advice to you is to separate what you’re consuming in the media from what is going on in court because of what you’re consuming even had a little bit of truth to it, it would show up in the complaints. Does that make any sense to you?

And what’s even beyond that is not only does this dominion nonsense not make the cut for what Trump is filing in court, and trust me it’s a very low standard for what they are filing, what Trump’s lawyers are filing in court is being laughed out of the courtroom.

Anyway, it’s red pill, blue pill time for you. You can actually see what is being alleged in court or stay in your right wing media safe space.

https://www.democracydocket.com/

Just had a conversation with someone who I consider truly informed. Long story short, Election fraud is likely even wider than originally indicated and Trump still has several options remaining.

Until Biden actually is sworn in, Trump is our President.
 
Back
Top