Possible Election Fraud in Progress

Trump's Wisconsin recount, which cost the campaign $3 million, has netted him a whopping 57 votes in his favor. Resort to suing to stop the certification now that the recount failed to alter the results.

Republicans sue to stop Wisconsin vote certification
Republicans have filed a lawsuit asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to block certification of the presidential election results
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/milwaukee-county-complete-recount-wednesday-74378711
 
Trump's Wisconsin recount, which cost the campaign $3 million, has netted him a whopping 57 votes in his favor. Resort to suing to stop the certification now that the recount failed to alter the results.

Republicans sue to stop Wisconsin vote certification
Republicans have filed a lawsuit asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to block certification of the presidential election results
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/milwaukee-county-complete-recount-wednesday-74378711

The indications of Wisconsin election fraud are arguably the most blatent of all the Swing States.

The implications of the information presented in the GA complaint is far reaching, suggesting the potential of a wider scope judical decision is in our future.
 
The indications of Wisconsin election fraud are arguably the most blatent of all the Swing States.

The implications of the information presented in the GA complaint is far reaching, suggesting the potential of a wider scope judical decision is in our future.

I disagree. And so do all the courts which have dismissed the cases as having no basis in fact.
 
Things are finally heating up in PA, a state that Biden is officially about 70,000 votes ahead. This begs the question: If there are hundreds of thousands of “Votes” that involved election fraud for the benefit of Biden, in a state he officially is ahead by about 70,000 votes, does it suggest the possibility Trump actually won the US 2020 Presidental election in a Reagan like landslide? A couple of sources for recent developments for PA:


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...70000_votes_for_biden_and_3200_for_trump.html

https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/penn...cle_0c1b8220-2f65-11eb-a152-aff5e17df758.html



From a former history professor and prominent Republican politician, Newt Gingrich:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_a...t-sloppy_3592153.html?v=ul?utm_source=partner



There is more going on than just PA:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-ballot-evidence-could-overturn-nevada-result



https://justthenews.com/politics-po...fficials-alleging-massive-scheme-rig-election



If there is massive election fraud and it is allowed to go unchallenged, Democracy in the United States ends upon the swearing in of a illegitimate President. We will never have legitimate elections again and any opposing political party will be effectively disbanded, similar to what happened in Nazi Germany leading to and through the end of WWII, except there, opposing political parties were made illegal and people were killed for making statements against Nazism.

Look at what has happened in the US recently so far: We have seem media propaganda that basically says election fraud is not possible, their have been veiled and not so veiled threats against attorneys and other outspoken supporters of the Trump Administration, and election laws were violated or selectively enforced for partisan advantages by the Democrat Party. The preceeding has been established. The question is why would the media and the Democrats take this route if they really believed election fraud was not possible? Why wouldn’t Democrats be willing to provide election transparency and allowing sworn testimony by corroborating witnesses to be heard in an open court if they did not fear election fraud woukd be uncovered?

When Benjamin Franklin was asked after a session of the Constitutional Convention, ""What kind of a government have you given us?"" he replied, ""A democracy, if you can keep it."" Our republic is founded on the principle that it will continue only as long as the people keep democracy alive.
The anesthesia administered by charismatic cult leaders causes myopia. It becomes impossible to break free. Sorry to say, you seem to have bought into the lies you're told; they are so easily believed by someone who is inclined in the first place to believe them, even though they make no sense to anyone outside the cult. .
 
Last edited:
I disagree. And so do all the courts which have dismissed the cases as having no basis in fact.

I want to hear what the various witnesses, who have signed affidavits, have to say, some of whom are election system experts, poll watchers, and election officials.
 
Here is the information you’ve requested: (Edit) This is for GA, but likely similar to other pending cases in other Swing States).


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION
CORECO JA’QAN PEARSON,
VIKKI TOWNSEND CONSIGLIO, GLORIA KAY GODWIN, JAMES KENNETH CARROLL, , CAROLYN HALL FISHER, CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM, and BRIAN JAY VAN GUNDY,
Plaintiffs. v.
BRIAN KEMP, in his official capacity as Governor of Georgia, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and Chair of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, REBECCA N.SULLIVAN, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, MATTHEW MASHBURN, in his official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board, and ANH LE, in her official capacity as a member of the Georgia State Election Board,
Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, EMERGENCY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
CASE NO.
1

NATURE OF THE ACTION
This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of Georgia laws, including O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-30(d), 21-2-31, 21-2- 33.1 and §21-2-522, and multiple Constitutional violations, as shown by fact witnesses to specific incidents, multiple expert witnesses and the sheer mathematical impossibilities found in the Georgia 2020 General Election.1
1.
As a civil action, the plaintiff’s burden of proof is a “preponderance of
the evidence” to show, as the Georgia Supreme Court has made clear that, “ was not incumbent upon [Plaintiff] to show how the [] voters would have voted if their [absentee] ballots had been regular. [Plaintiff] only had to show that there were enough irregular ballots to place in doubt the result.” Mead v. Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 272, 601 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2004) (citing Howell v. Fears, 275 Ga. 627, 571 S.E.2d 392 (2002).



Due to space limitations, I left out the other 209 complaints/evidence of election fraud. The link to the entire complaint is at the bottom of this post.



1 The same pattern of election fraud and voter fraud writ large occurred in all the swing states with only minor variations, see expert reports, regarding Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Wisconsin. (See William M. Briggs Decl., attached here to as Exh. 1, Report with Attachment). Indeed, we believe that in Arizona at least 35,000 votes were illegally added to Mr. Biden’s vote count.

211.
For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in
their favor and provide the following emergency relief:
1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
100

4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted;
101

10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects;
11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3.
14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988.
Respectfully submitted, this 25th day of November, 2020. 102

CALDWELL, PROPST & DELOACH, LLP



https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf
as those of us who remain sane have mentioned, there is zero reliable evidence of any fraud in this filing. And that's why these suits get thrown out of court. All you have is a recitation of conjectures without any evidence.

If I were to explain to you in great detail how it is that martians are taking over the Earth, some would accept it as evidence that Martians are taking over the Earth. You would be one of those.
 
I want to hear what the various witnesses, who have signed affidavits, have to say, some of whom are election system experts, poll watchers, and election officials.

It will mirror Pennsylvania and other states where the judge lectures Trump’s lawyers that every witness statement they submitted is an example of the proper way to count votes and none of the witness statements indicate any irregularities whatsoever.
 
Back
Top