Possible Election Fraud in Progress

I haven't researched it longer than to show readers here how the appellate court feels about the case you quoted.

But off the top of my head:

Real life is not simplistic. Facts and details matter...for the particular case/situation. That said,

Do you know that in the US, we believe that it is better to let a guilty person escape justice, rather than convict an innocent man?

1. Dead people are dead, and can't vote, even if they are on the rolls.
2. Depriving citizen's the right to vote simply because they committed a crimes is a questionable practice in and of itself.
They are still citizens, number one.
And once they've paid their debt, they shouldn't have to continue being punished for the rest of their life.
And on what basis is it fair to say that a citizen in prison/jail should not have a say in picking politicians that will make decisions affecting their life, and the lives of underaged loved ones?
3. Students that moved, will vote where they currently live.

Correctamundo, dead people can’t vote. Live people have voted for dead people, though. Consider a case of a caregiver seeing a ballot of a client’s dead spouse and deciding to use that ballot for their own purposes. Worse yet, how about a coordinated effort of an outside party looking to influence an election by counting the names of dead people and obtaining replacement ballots using their personal information on file?

There have been numberous examples of dead people “Voting” in elections. Some voter rolls still have people listed who have been dead for decades. Why not reduce the possibility of fraud?
 
Evidence?

If you want to refer to a video, tell us where the evidence is in the video (mm:ss).

I was planning to do just what you are requesting, but have not gotten around to it. I will annotate this video with time references hopefully by tomorrow night.
 
Correctamundo, dead people can’t vote. Live people have voted for dead people, though. Consider a case of a caregiver seeing a ballot of a client’s dead spouse and deciding to use that ballot for their own purposes. Worse yet, how about a coordinated effort of an outside party looking to influence an election by counting the names of dead people and obtaining replacement ballots using their personal information on file?

There have been numberous examples of dead people “Voting” in elections. Some voter rolls still have people listed who have been dead for decades. Why not reduce the possibility of fraud?

Yet, there hasn't been any evidence of massive fraud, or fraud sufficient enough to turn a POTUS election...ever.

Criminals commit credit card fraud. Should we ban credit cards? Or should we find a workable solution?
 
Yet, there hasn't been any evidence of massive fraud, or fraud sufficient enough to turn a POTUS election...ever.

Criminals commit credit card fraud. Should we ban credit cards? Or should we find a workable solution?

The workable solution is to investigate credible concerns of election fraud or other election irregularities and take appropriate measures if fraud or irregularities are found such that the election results can be considered in compliance with our election laws.
 
The workable solution is to investigate credible concerns of election fraud or other election irregularities and take appropriate measures if fraud or irregularities are found such that the election results can be considered in compliance with our election laws.
The latter part of your sentence seems a little off; but I agree with what I think you mean.
 
Georgia GOP election official ‘stunned’ after Lindsey Graham pressures him to throw out thousands of ballots

VID_20201108_11.19.12-0002.jpg


On Monday, The Washington Post reported that Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, revealed in an interview that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) pressured him to toss thousands of valid ballots — and even suggested blocking entire counties from having their mail-in ballots counted.

“In the interview, Raffensperger … said he spoke on Friday to Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has echoed Trump’s unfounded claims about voting irregularities,” reported Amy Gardner. “In their conversation, Graham questioned Raffensperger about the state’s signature-matching law and whether political bias could have prompted poll workers to accept ballots with nonmatching signatures, according to Raffensperger. Graham also asked whether Raffensperger had the power to toss all mail ballots in counties found to have higher rates of nonmatching signatures, Raffensperger said.”

“Raffspenger said he was stunned that Graham appeared to suggest that he find a way to toss legally cast ballots,” said the report. “Absent court intervention, Raffensperger doesn’t have the power to do what Graham suggested, as counties administer elections in Georgia. ‘It sure looked like he was wanting to go down that road,’ he said.”
 
Sadly, the most astonishing thing about this is that the official was "stunned."

Georgia GOP election official ‘stunned’ after Lindsey Graham pressures him to throw out thousands of ballots

VID_20201108_11.19.12-0002.jpg


On Monday, The Washington Post reported that Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, revealed in an interview that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) pressured him to toss thousands of valid ballots — and even suggested blocking entire counties from having their mail-in ballots counted.

“In the interview, Raffensperger … said he spoke on Friday to Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has echoed Trump’s unfounded claims about voting irregularities,” reported Amy Gardner. “In their conversation, Graham questioned Raffensperger about the state’s signature-matching law and whether political bias could have prompted poll workers to accept ballots with nonmatching signatures, according to Raffensperger. Graham also asked whether Raffensperger had the power to toss all mail ballots in counties found to have higher rates of nonmatching signatures, Raffensperger said.”

“Raffspenger said he was stunned that Graham appeared to suggest that he find a way to toss legally cast ballots,” said the report. “Absent court intervention, Raffensperger doesn’t have the power to do what Graham suggested, as counties administer elections in Georgia. ‘It sure looked like he was wanting to go down that road,’ he said.”
 
Georgia GOP election official ‘stunned’ after Lindsey Graham pressures him to throw out thousands of ballots

VID_20201108_11.19.12-0002.jpg


On Monday, The Washington Post reported that Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, revealed in an interview that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) pressured him to toss thousands of valid ballots — and even suggested blocking entire counties from having their mail-in ballots counted.

“In the interview, Raffensperger … said he spoke on Friday to Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has echoed Trump’s unfounded claims about voting irregularities,” reported Amy Gardner. “In their conversation, Graham questioned Raffensperger about the state’s signature-matching law and whether political bias could have prompted poll workers to accept ballots with nonmatching signatures, according to Raffensperger. Graham also asked whether Raffensperger had the power to toss all mail ballots in counties found to have higher rates of nonmatching signatures, Raffensperger said.”

“Raffspenger said he was stunned that Graham appeared to suggest that he find a way to toss legally cast ballots,” said the report. “Absent court intervention, Raffensperger doesn’t have the power to do what Graham suggested, as counties administer elections in Georgia. ‘It sure looked like he was wanting to go down that road,’ he said.”

Serious charge. An invesigation by an ethics committee seeems in order here.
 
Back
Top