Tell you what... if all your problems are with PA. let's just say Trump won PA and stop it right here... Joe has enough votes without PA but let you have your day in court.
Possible Election Fraud in Progress
- Thread starter BeautifulStranger
- Start date
So the short answer is you have NO PERSONAL proof of election fraud in PA.
Thank you for admitting it here before all of us... not let's be quiet and let the lawsuits keep getting tossed.
I am all for you taking your personal beef to court or as I suggested before donating a suitable donation ( say $10,000 ) to Trump to fight the "election fraud". My personal opinion is some lessons in life must be felt personally, so you'll have to get some skin in this game you are playing before I can take you seriously. Your "evidence" will certainly go to waste if you don't act quickly on it. Feel free and report back to us on your efforts.
I made my points in post one of this thread. As additional information has come forth, I posted it, as have other posters in other threads. Last time I checked, realclearpolitics.com had quite a few articles addressing each side of the election fraud investigation. Is “Election fraud investigation” too strongly worded for you? How does Russion collusion investigation sound?
Free speech is still allowed, even for Trump supporters. I have pointed out the many indications of fraud in several states and provided significant support for my statements. Ultimately the courts will decide on what, if any remedies should be taken. Not me, you, The DNC, the RNC, or the media.
Why is not ensuring the integrity of the elections, especially when there is overwhelming indications of fraud, the best course of action? Other than a fraud coverup attempt, that is?
If “Proof” of all facts are required before a poster is allowed to post, or a reporter can report, or a politician can speak, how can there be any communication? You are asking for an unreasonable standard that you personally don’t adhere to while posting here on ET.
Again, the courts will decide if there is sufficient proof of election fraud or other voting irregularities that warrant appropriate application of remedies.
It's my understanding that the election occurs next month. Please advise---
I and other Trump supporters have “Skin in the game” by paying our taxes and following community standards concerning rule of law and by making sure our votes count and that we legally get the leader who represents our values. Admittedly, I like your “Skin in the game idea” when it comes to asking or supporting a new piece of legislation. Think it through if your skin in the game idea were applied equally. By the way, I could foot a ten thousand dollar expense, not that I’m looking to give money away. Actually, I did contribute my time by driving 90 miles to Waco, TX, each way, to meet with a prominent Republican Representative to discuss ideas on how to quickly reconcile the electronic count and county voting records as well as ideas how to quickly address phantom, ghost, and purged votes.
By the way, quite a ways back in this thread, a poster linked a request by Kamala for funds in defense of the election. Have you contributed or would like to? Yes I know you are Canadian, but what the hell, you are passionate about American politics, right?
You mean a recount or full blown redo? I am not up to speed on what the possible remedies are .
Here is a fun fact: The nationwide election audit that Trump is now pushing for was a feature of the elections security bill that was passed in the House, but blocked in the Senate by McConnell.
Electoral College meets in December. That's when the election happens. So, there is plenty of time to investigate and let everything play out. Right now, Idiot Dems are prolonging the first count so that less and less time will be available for recounts etc.
Where was Obama on this issue?
Also fun was Democrats opposing electronic voting initiatives during George Bush’s term over concerns of transparency and conflict of interest because someone on Bush’s team was on the board of directors on one of the electronic voting companies. That person may have been Dick Cheney. Kamala bragged about getting the Bush family endorsement during her Vice Presidential debate against Pence.
I am happy to have Biden as our President if our legitimate concerns are shown to be insufficient. The media can’t do this. The DNC can’t do this. Fellow bloggers can’t do this. Only Trump can do this with a concession, although given the accumulation of indications of fraud, I wouldn’t entirely be satisfied with that outcome, the Democrats start cooperating, or the courts provide immediate closure with a decision for the defense or a remedy that ultimately leads to closure.
If Joe ultimately prevails, think of all the prestige and credibility he will accumulate from both sides of the aisle. I can certaintly speak for myself and it seems likely the all-important Independent voters will be positively swayed as well.
If you have ideas that you don’t want to make public and want to remain confidental and otherwise trust me, send me a PM for an off the record conversation.
The possibilities are we work together, I become neutral and silent on this issue, or I remain committed to this issue. Regardless, any PM exchange is to remain confidential unless we both specifically agree otherwise.
Remember, I am a long term registered Democrat who was an activist and part of a protest group during George Bush’s second Iraq War.