Possible Election Fraud in Progress

I found these graphs of Michigan and Wisconsin on Twitter. Looks like fraud. I recall Nevada being up 70% for Trump late into the evening also, so we should find the graph for that one too. These three states would give Biden magically, exactly 270.

What election officials have not explained is why absentee mail in ballots which came in much earlier has not been counted ahead of the in-person votes when they came in much, much earlier? Now, they are saying that they have millions of mail in ballots that still needs to be counted out of the blue? Those tabulating machines can count 32,000 ballots in a short period of time. I do not care if you have 3,000,000 ballots to count, those tabulating machines could finish counting those votes in a span of a couple of hours easily. The snail's pace vote count is highly, suspicious on its face alone. If you are just counting the votes, why not finish it promptly, to avoid any suspicions altogether?
 
Im looking for the place Sanders says two of those states will find a batch of votes, all for Biden, at exactly the same time in the wee hours of the morning, when the fewest eyeballs were on the ball, just enough vote to put Biden in the lead by less than 1%. Where did Sanders say that? But he did say enough, in enough detail, to appear to be very confident about sime fore-knowledge. Appears premeditated.

Sanders was speaking in this video with Jimmy Fallon beginning of october. This can be checked on Youtube. So at least 4 weeks before crook Trump used this argument to fight his loss.
Trump was premeditated. Like he always is. Trump spoke these words today, Sanders did not force him to do so. Or did Trump have some obscure deal with Sanders?
 
Hmm, looks like Bernie Sanders magically predicted, with unusually strong confidence, that this would happen. So with Nevada, this is a lot like three skyscrapers falling to the ground in one day (remember WTC 7 ?)
 

Attachments

  • El-4WeYVoAAiPxW.jpeg
    El-4WeYVoAAiPxW.jpeg
    111.1 KB · Views: 10
  • El-4WeYVMAAlhtv.jpeg
    El-4WeYVMAAlhtv.jpeg
    94.4 KB · Views: 8
Exactly....both are false claims with no proof. Glad we agree.

I was vocal against the Russia Russia Russia back then also by the way.

Did hunter get a job because of Daddy? YUP.
Did cumstains Jared and Ivanka get White House jobs because of Jared? YUP

So unless Barr has a case agaisnt Joe outside of simply being bulied into it by his boss because he has no balls, then this is a non issue.
Sounds good! Deal :thumbsup:
 
Sanders was speaking in this video with Jimmy Fallon beginning of october. This can be checked on Youtube. So at least 4 weeks before crook Trump used this argument to fight his loss.
Trump was premeditated. Like he always is.
So why are you suggesting Sanders wasnt in on the plan to do this?
 
It's common sense to most of us that it is highly likely that there has been massive fraud.

You never want to say someone is a liar, has committed fraud, or a sex crime unless you are absolutely sure they did it. This is why I use the word “Anomalies” when describing a situation that may involve fraud.

You may feel it is unfair for us to maintain higher standards of personal conduct than some prominent Democrats as seen not too long ago such as Christina Blasey Ford against Justice Kavanaugh, etc., but it is what it is. While we may have to work harder in the short run, over time, opportunities will often present themselves because of our strong reputation. Did you read an earlier post in this thread where the poster was seemingly bragging about Democrats having the ex-felon vote? Respecting rule of law gives us the benefit of more productive relationships and economic opportunities.

The philosophical difference between political parties is often driven by character differences.

Under Trump and Republicans this philosophy is along the lines of “This is how we live and you are welcome to join us”. Then we often lend a helping hand to someone wants to join us. Sure, there are Conservative religeous people who seem to want shove their belief system down our throat and who may mean well, but it is admittedly annoying.

Democrats seem to have become intolerant to views that are not their own. We have the media in all its forms telling us what is politically correct and that we owe others as a country or a person because we are inherently bad. Most people really don’t want to hear that kind of message, so it has to be packaged carefully. Democrats have to create or take advantage of a crisis that they can address. Note, I used the word “Address”, not solved. Democrats need to make their supporters unhappy so they can blame others for that unhappiness. It is no coincidence that the poor, including felons, are attracted to that message. “It is not your fault that you are unhappy”. It is someone elses fault. Blaming others is like a prison of the mind. Until one takes control of their life and accepts personal responsibility for all that goes wrong, success and happiness will likely remain elusive.

The best we can do is encourage them and not let them bring us down.
 
What election officials have not explained is why absentee mail in ballots which came in much earlier has not been counted ahead of the in-person votes when they came in much, much earlier? Now, they are saying that they have millions of mail in ballots that still needs to be counted out of the blue? Those tabulating machines can count 32,000 ballots in a short period of time. I do not care if you have 3,000,000 ballots to count, those tabulating machines could finish counting those votes in a span of a couple of hours easily. The snail's pace vote count is highly, suspicious on its face alone. If you are just counting the votes, why not finish it promptly, to avoid any suspicions altogether?
Excellent observation smallfil. I had thought the exact same thing but was having hard time articulating it. Theres no excuse for a sudden surge, or to start counting the earliest votes latest in the evening (wee hours of the morning). Did the mailman arrive with a sack over his shoulder at 4 AM? At the same time in two different states?
 
You may feel it is unfair for us to maintain higher standards of personal conduct than some prominent Democrats as seen not too long ago such as Christina Blasey Ford against Justice Kavanaugh, etc., but it is what it is. While we may have to work harder in the short run, over time, opportunities will often present themselves because of our strong reputation. Did you read an earlier post in this thread where the poster was seemingly bragging about Democrats having the ex-felon vote? Respecting rule of law gives us the benefit of more productive relationships and economic opportunities.
Check who you are replying to. I am a Pro-American Conservative. I am not an Idiot Dem.
 
Excellent observation smallfil. I had thought the exact same thing but was having hard time articulating it. Theres no excuse for a sudden surge, or to start counting the earliest votes latest in the evening (wee hours of the morning). Did the mailman arrive with a sack over his shoulder at 4 AM? At the same time in two different states?

Do you guys even know how the votes are counted? You think Republicans don't watch over every single vote that's added? Or how many voters are there in each county?

https://www.axios.com/red-mirage-election-night-5fe7bc5a-2e75-4ffc-917b-ddb05ddddaa2.html

Keep crying though, election is over as B1S2 would have said, you dont realize it yet.
 
Back
Top