If you were to go back and read my post in regard to your observation of what you thought were anomalies, you would find that I did address these supposed anomalies, and I explained how they were not anomalies, but were to be expected in the normal course of election night, and election week. You failed to take into account that many mail-in ballots were not counted until well after the polls closed on Nov. 3rd. And that ballots continued to arrive at the places where they were counted long after the polls closed. You treated the"canvasing" of ballots as if the ballots were all present at the counting places before the counting begin, and the total number of ballots cast was known when the counting begin. This was not the case. Thus you concluded, erroneously, that when the percent of ballots counted dropped, rather than continuously increased as you expected they should, that that indicated an anomaly. This was merely an artifact of the delays in ballots arriving at the counting places.
The thing I find most bizarre is that of millions of people observed the same thing you observed; yet you were among the few who concluded that the reporting of results indicated an anomaly. We all saw exactly the same thing, including the election officials from both parties; your interpretation was the outlier. This is indeed bizarre.
it is funny how only the sore losers lack confidence in the system that seem to work fine in 2020....2016...2012...2008...
The system has been gamed before 2020. Just ask Congressman Pete Sessions.
Again, suspicious, impossible or nearly impossible statistical anomalies, corroborating witnesses who signed affidavits, including election officials, poll watchers, and electronic voting experts, a media that initially would not cover the story, established violation of election laws in multiple states, in particular PA, a similar pattern of among Swing states in contention of shuting down about same time, starting up about the same time, along with Biden inexplicably gaining ground on Trump, especially considering Trump was looking like he was running away with the vote like in 2016. By the way, in at least some states, such as PA, the mail in ballots were not counted until later. There are also significant examples of invalid and or fraudulent ballots, along with the testimony of several UPS drivers.
You don’t have to have to take my word for it. Click a link or two of the many dozens of sources throughout this and other threads. The big kuhuna is corroborating witnesses who signed affidavits in spite of intimidation and media pressure suggesting legal repercussions will be applied to those who provide “false information”. There was also lawyer intimidation, particularly in PA by the media.
Once side is demanding transparency, the other is attempting to block transparency. That alone suggests who is on the right side of the debate.
How about you: Transparency, yay or transparency, nay?


