It appears that individual stocks run the risk array from -30% to +30%. I found that a short call works a little better than a long put. It is so far ITM that its time value is negligible and its delta is unaffected at 30% so that it is calculated to have zero directional risk. The high capital requirement for the option doesn't matter here only the margin - $37500 margin on 1000 contracts is actually the lowest it can ever go based on a FINRA rule for portfolio margin. If I use the 8 call instead of the 5, it only adds about $300 to that. Further and it starts to increase rapidly. The actual max leverage ratio varies with the price of the stock relative to this minimum margin.
View attachment 210457
Now, my understanding is that for this example I'm going to be paying the IB margin rate on about 493k @ 3.4%, while I earn about 12% on the stock which pays monthly dividends of about 1%. This is of course amplified enormously relative to the margin required. Even if I had long options and was paying 3.4% on the entire position, it would only eat about half the dividend. It looks like the return on margin is higher than 200% yearly. Also dividend risk (if lowered 10-20% which could happen for AGNC) mainly affects the price of the stock which is fully hedged, so it would just lower the return a bit. Did I make some kind of mistake here??