Porn star says drunk republicans hit on her most frequently

[saxon]

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

I see your sense of humor is on life support sax....

ok, zzz...

to be on the safe side...from now on I'll assume that ALL of your threads are posted in jest.

not so hard to do.

 

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

Ass u me whatever you like....

Quote from saxon:

ok, zzz...

to be on the safe side...from now on I'll assume that ALL of your threads are posted in jest.

not so hard to do.

 

[whitster]

i see this classic fallacy ALL THE TIME, that politicians from either party supposedly are supposed to represent the party values.

republican politicians and democrat politicians

are...
POLITICIANS

neither "represent" republican or democratic values, nearly as much as they represent the fact that they are POLTICIANS

duh...

it's that simple.

one could argue that one parties PLATFORM is or isn't more moral, on any given issue, or on the whole.

i highly doubt there is much difference in personal morality between politicians of the parties. because they are politicians

also, im not aware that getting drunk or hitting on attractive women are NOT republican values fwiw. i have noticed that over the age of 23 or so, republican women do happen to be better looking than dems - and gay men are better looking than straights. why is another issue.

PJ Orourke (one of my favorite repubs ever) would certainly support both

 

[acronym]

Stuff politics, just post some good mary carey links already.

 

[sputdr]

I just enjoy your justification of Bill Clinton's behavior because it makes you look so stupid.

I didnt' realize as long as you didnt' claim moral superiority you could behave any way you wanted, I always thought that's why we had laws. I doubt the KKK believed lynchings were wrong so I guess that makes what they do ok right?

Anyways, how do you know they weren't single GOP'ers and all they did was hit on her anyways and secondly a women whose occuption it is to get hit in the ass and take cum shots to the face probably isnt' the best source of information but that's just me.

Quote from dddooo:

Bill Clinton has never claimed moral superiority unlike sexually repressed abstinence-touting conservatives like you.

PS Have you noticed that in absolutely every thread on absolutely any subject you invariably bring up Bill Clinton. It's getting boring, really. Get a grip.

 

[acronym]

Actually, prostitution tends to do its best business when international church groups/ delegations/conferences and the like are in town.
But you can look it up, given as how you dont claim moral superiority an 'all..........
Fool.

 

[dddooo]

Quote from sputdr:

I just enjoy your justification of Bill Clinton's behavior.
First I did not justify Bill Clinton, second there was no Clinton's "behavior", you made up a hypothetical Clinton's encounter with a porn star - it was a pigment of your sick imagination and not actual Clinton's behavior.

I didnt' realize as long as you didnt' claim moral superiority you could behave any way you wanted, I always thought that's why we had laws.
Wrong again, morality has nothing to do with legality, laws don't address moral issues. The point I was making though was that even if Bill Clinton was openly immoral, sexually-repressed conservatives are both immoral and hypocritical

Anyways, how do you know they weren't single GOP'ers
That does not matter as they are constantly preaching against pre-marital sex, once again hypocritical to the core. GOPers should do what they preach, remain virgins till they are married and have sex with their spouses only. IMO they should not reproduce though.

 

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

"....and gay men are better looking than straights."


So you find gay men better looking than straight men?

ROTFLMAO......

How manly of you to take the time to make such a comparative analysis.....

Quote from whitster:

i see this classic fallacy ALL THE TIME, that politicians from either party supposedly are supposed to represent the party values.

republican politicians and democrat politicians

are...
POLITICIANS

neither "represent" republican or democratic values, nearly as much as they represent the fact that they are POLTICIANS

duh...

it's that simple.

one could argue that one parties PLATFORM is or isn't more moral, on any given issue, or on the whole.

i highly doubt there is much difference in personal morality between politicians of the parties. because they are politicians

also, im not aware that getting drunk or hitting on attractive women are NOT republican values fwiw. i have noticed that over the age of 23 or so, republican women do happen to be better looking than dems - and gay men are better looking than straights. why is another issue.

PJ Orourke (one of my favorite repubs ever) would certainly support both

 

[version77]

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:So you find gay men better looking than straight men?

Isn't that what Democraps say while marching around in gay parades
trying to figure out how to get all these gay laws passed so the gays
will vote for the Democrips and give the Democruds a better chance
to win the White House and maybe even take over the House or Senate?

And in the next breath say something like "Wow, fellow libbyeralls,
if we can get all these beautifull gay guys to marry each other it
will give us ugly Demogods a better chance to find a woman that
looks a little better than Janet Reno"...

 

[whitster]

i think it's pretty well accepted in both the gay and straight communities alike that gay men, on average, are better looking than straights.

gay pub's such as the advocate have remarked on this, as has the village voice ( a progressive weekly), and many other pop culture outlets.

certainly, they (on average) pay more attention to fitness and grooming, which tend to be relatively more important as one ages

it's a stereotype, but it happens to be true - in the AGGREGATE - it says nothing about individuals.

here are some other observations i've noticed. football players tend to be more muscular than the average guy. basketball players tend to be taller.

also, several peer reviewed studies HAVE shown that lesbians tend to have higher T levels on average than straight women.

all interesting imo

it's just an observation (n=many), supported by many in both the gay & straight communities.

if your opinion differs, that's great.