jem you're like one of those 'real life events' whose shit couldn't be made up. I would guess even the most crass film maker wouldn't put anything you come up with into a story line due to it being so ill-informed and contradictory no one would want it .Quote from jem:
here is a link to 2 and half minute video by suskind on the subject. the end is the critical part.
http://bastardlogic.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/susskind-intelligent-design/
straight from the horses mouth.
He states at the very end that we have a very large universe with many environments and that only a small fraction of those universes are capable of sustaining life. And that we live in that small fractions of the universe that looks as though it were intelligently designed.
Get it - you anti science atheists out there.
If there is one universe we are in it and it looks spectacularly designed. But if there are an almost infinite amount of universes or "environments" we can not make the design inference.
--
If you do further research you will see there is no proof of those other environments. they are only conjecture.
I know this is an anonymous board but honestly, surely you must have felt a twinge of embarrassment by now.
From your many ineptitudes calling yourself a lawyer who couldn't spell cite even when shown, but now the light has switched on, can't stop using the word, to an obsession with Susskind, a scientist who if he is right, even you say will disprove your Creator/intelligent design nonsense anyway. I wonder how long before the switch gets thrown and that fact dawns on you , in the way your understanding of that spelling inadequacy eventually did.
You're obsessed with Susskind. . Science is not like your Catholic Church. It doesn't have a single head representative which declares bullshit on its behalf.
Unlike your Pope or your Church, Susskind and every other scientist is in the end accountable to the Scientific Method. Even if God wants to be a scientist , It too is accountable to the same method. There is no escape; otherwise it is not science.
What is laughable is you're having all these Susskind raptures, but why? When or if Susskind does eventually fully account to the Scientific Method, it will disprove a Creator and what ever it is you are calling intelligent design..
Oh hello...you're promoting a scientist whose propositions if proven true, would establish no Creator/intelligent design. But you think that is a good argument for God/Creator/intelligent design. Why?? because the scientist may be wrong..!!
Honestly, you couldn't make that shit up!
... not stating something.....Quote from jem:
Science does not state there is no Creator.
.....does not have to infer something elseQuote from jem:
They simple do not have the tools to disprove a Creator.
.... you simply do not have the tools to disprove no Creator.