Simple physics.All fighting aside, why should global warming necessarily mean more extreme weather patterns? I'm unfamiliar w/the thermo on a global scale, but couldn't it mean quite the opposite? It feels like forever since I heard of a tornado devastating a town.
Huh? Did you mean to post that in another thread? Because otherwise you are losing your marbles.Democrat voters are like elderly people who sent money to the nigerian prince whose funds were blocked, then they get furious at family members who point out it is a scam.
You seem unhinged, sort of like Trump. Relax and take a deep breath. This amounts to nothing but relatively simple physics and statistical analysis of reams of data. No need to get worked up about it. Save your passion for when you realize just how catastrophically wrong you are, and you become a gladiator to save the planet.
We would do no such thing of what you are suggesting if we saw one monster storm. One data point does not a trend make. But we are seeing stronger storms, although paradoxically, fewer of them, from the time records have been kept.
See the post two above this one.
Simple physics.
If you need evidence of it on a scale that would blow your mind, look at planets in our solar system that are really hot, and then start gathering facts about them, like wind speed, storm sizes and intensities, etc.
Huh? Did you mean to post that in another thread? Because otherwise you are losing your marbles.
AAA has no marbles to lose. He's a homophobe, science denier, racist, ignorant, angry, religious moron, Trumper. In other words, the typical righty.
