K kowboy May 4, 2004 #12 Quote from candletrader: Thanks, Moderator, for removing the various uncalled for posts of one of our immature members... much appreciated... More...
Quote from candletrader: Thanks, Moderator, for removing the various uncalled for posts of one of our immature members... much appreciated... More...
C candletrader May 5, 2004 #13 Quote from Cutten: I lean towards buying, I find the risk/reward is much better. More... But do you find the expectancy is better (i.e. risk:reward ratio, once adjusted by probability)...
Quote from Cutten: I lean towards buying, I find the risk/reward is much better. More... But do you find the expectancy is better (i.e. risk:reward ratio, once adjusted by probability)...
M murray t turtle May 7, 2004 #14 Quote from Samson77: The only way to make any consistent money from options IMO is to write em baby. More... %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure options, because of slippage,sellers edge, leverage & commissions; tend to help produce a more sawtooth non smooth equity curve. Many, but not all insurance companies make money investing & selling; however prefer occasional derivative buying but cant think of a worse market than options to hypertrade for an average trader.
Quote from Samson77: The only way to make any consistent money from options IMO is to write em baby. More... %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Figure options, because of slippage,sellers edge, leverage & commissions; tend to help produce a more sawtooth non smooth equity curve. Many, but not all insurance companies make money investing & selling; however prefer occasional derivative buying but cant think of a worse market than options to hypertrade for an average trader.
C Cutten May 7, 2004 #15 Quote from candletrader: But do you find the expectancy is better (i.e. risk:reward ratio, once adjusted by probability)... More... Yes, much better, especially when you take into account the low requirement for capital.
Quote from candletrader: But do you find the expectancy is better (i.e. risk:reward ratio, once adjusted by probability)... More... Yes, much better, especially when you take into account the low requirement for capital.
C candletrader May 8, 2004 #17 Quote from Cutten: Yes, much better, especially when you take into account the low requirement for capital. More... I suppose it boils down to personal psychology... Net seller: Low expectancy per trade but high probability of a win VERSUS Net buyer: Low probability of a win, but the occasional massive home run...
Quote from Cutten: Yes, much better, especially when you take into account the low requirement for capital. More... I suppose it boils down to personal psychology... Net seller: Low expectancy per trade but high probability of a win VERSUS Net buyer: Low probability of a win, but the occasional massive home run...