It isn't Trump suspected of illegal wiretapping of a campaign headquarters during a nationa election. It is the Obama regime and they are going to be investigated and much of their communications made public. Indictments will follow. See how that works?
Poll: Will Trump implode or be impeached within the next 4 years?
- Thread starter Frederick Foresight
- Start date
It isn't Trump suspected of illegal wiretapping of a campaign headquarters during a nationa election. It is the Obama regime and they are going to be investigated and much of their communications made public. Indictments will follow. See how that works?
All of that is taking place in The GOP bubble,not the real world.In the real world Trump is in deep shit.
Tony nearly every word you've said in this forum has proven to be profoundly incorrect. This is simply yet another instance where you have got things backwards.
I think i've figured out how authoritarian gov'ts get started.
Conservative Student Receives Death
Threats, and His Car Is Vandalized
PJ Media, by Tom Knighton Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/10/2017 12:58:33 PM Post Reply
To say our nation is divided may well be the grandest of understatements. Neither side has any interest in even listening to the other or engaging in a real and meaningful debate. Instead, things seem to be getting uglier and uglier as time marches on. It´s especially bad for college students who lean to the right. They´re surrounded, dropped well behind enemy lines -- and it doesn´t even matter all that much if you´re in a red state: Frank Pray, a senior at UNC-CH, said he has received death threats, been called a “racist” and a “bigot” and had his..
At some point the victims get fed up and crack down. Then the violent thuggish marxists claim they're a victim of an authoritarian. And they can't figure out how it got started.
Conservative Student Receives Death
Threats, and His Car Is Vandalized
PJ Media, by Tom Knighton Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/10/2017 12:58:33 PM Post Reply
To say our nation is divided may well be the grandest of understatements. Neither side has any interest in even listening to the other or engaging in a real and meaningful debate. Instead, things seem to be getting uglier and uglier as time marches on. It´s especially bad for college students who lean to the right. They´re surrounded, dropped well behind enemy lines -- and it doesn´t even matter all that much if you´re in a red state: Frank Pray, a senior at UNC-CH, said he has received death threats, been called a “racist” and a “bigot” and had his..
At some point the victims get fed up and crack down. Then the violent thuggish marxists claim they're a victim of an authoritarian. And they can't figure out how it got started.
Judge to Trump: No protection for speech inciting violence:
http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/judge-to-trump-no-protection-for-speech-inciting-violence-1.3350954
The Associated Press
Published Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:45PM EDT
Last Updated Saturday, April 1, 2017 8:24PM EDT
LOUISVILLE, Ky. -- A federal judge has rejected President Donald Trump's free speech defence against a lawsuit accusing him of inciting violence against protesters at a campaign rally.
Trump's lawyers sought to dismiss the lawsuit by three protesters who say they were roughed up by his supporters at a March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky. They argued that Trump didn't intend for his supporters to use force.
Two women and a man say they were shoved and punched by audience members at Trump's command. Much of it was captured on video and widely broadcast during the campaign, showing Trump pointing at the protesters and repeating "get them out."
Judge David J. Hale in Louisville ruled Friday that the suit against Trump, his campaign and three of his supporters can proceed. Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/judge-to-trump-no-protection-for-speech-inciting-violence-1.3350954
The Associated Press
Published Saturday, April 1, 2017 7:45PM EDT
Last Updated Saturday, April 1, 2017 8:24PM EDT
LOUISVILLE, Ky. -- A federal judge has rejected President Donald Trump's free speech defence against a lawsuit accusing him of inciting violence against protesters at a campaign rally.
Trump's lawyers sought to dismiss the lawsuit by three protesters who say they were roughed up by his supporters at a March 1, 2016 rally in Louisville, Kentucky. They argued that Trump didn't intend for his supporters to use force.
Two women and a man say they were shoved and punched by audience members at Trump's command. Much of it was captured on video and widely broadcast during the campaign, showing Trump pointing at the protesters and repeating "get them out."
Judge David J. Hale in Louisville ruled Friday that the suit against Trump, his campaign and three of his supporters can proceed. Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.
