Poll- Who is worst U.S. President ever?

Who is worst U.S. President ever?

  • Total voters
    31
Ricter said:
Fair enough. I didn't think you were a race voter in any case. But looking at the data I linked to, it's pretty clear where the racism actually is. Everyone voted more for Obama--presumably their motives all differed as much as their gender, age, and race--except... for old, Southern, white men
More...

So it was racism since more Southern white men voted for McCain over B. Hussein.
Your data also showed African-Americans voted overwhelmingly, by a 95% to 4% margin, for B. Hussein over McCain.
Is it safe to say then that there was racism coming from the African-American voting bloc since they voted more for the black candidate over the old white guy?
 
reg said:
So it was racism since more Southern white men voted for McCain over B. Hussein.
Your data also showed African-Americans voted overwhelmingly, by a 95% to 4% margin, for B. Hussein over McCain.
Is it safe to say then that there was racism coming from the African-American voting bloc since they voted more for the black candidate over the old white guy?
More...

The ongoing rightie claim "racism" is based on the increased "black" vote for Obama. But based on the data, everyone (except for old, "white", and especially Southern, men) voted more for Obama. So if the former claim holds up, particularly without actually getting inside every other gender, age, and race's head to discover their true motive, then the latter claim holds up.
 
Ricter said:
The ongoing rightie claim "racism" is based on the increased "black" vote for Obama. But based on the data, everyone (except for old, "white", and especially Southern, men) voted more for Obama. So if the former claim holds up, particularly without actually getting inside every other gender, age, and race's head to discover their true motive, then the latter claim holds up.
More...

You based your conclusion that since all subgroups voted for Obama in 2008 except for old, Southern, white men, ergo these Southern white men must be racists.
Southern whites have always voted Republican in every presidential election since at least 1972 regardless of the candidate while blacks have always voted Democrat in every election of the same time span. Old, Southern white men voting for McCain does not make them any more racist than blacks voting for Obama in 2008. These whites have voted Republican in the past 9 presidential elections before 2008.
Your attempt to paint this group as racist is either because of ignorance or dishonesty.
I would like to think that you are just being ignorant.

http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/national-exit-polls.html
 
reg said:
You based your conclusion that since all subgroups voted for Obama in 2008 except for old, Southern, white men, ergo these Southern white men must be racists.
More...

That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that the claim Obama won because of "white guilt" is ridiculous.
 
attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php
 
377OHMS said:
Lots of "islamic militants" got killed so I think it was necessary. Might have been better to do Iran instead of Iraq but "what difference does it make at this point?" They are *all* going to need attention in the long run.

You eventually have to go directly to the source of little white pickup trucks filled with low-IQ bad guys. Every LWPT that we zot improves the human gene pool and the scrap metal goes to s. korea so they can crank out more Hyundai's.
More...
:D Iran is not like Iraq .a very powerful and vast army .after invasion of Iraq by USA ,Iran took control of Iraq and elected one of it's elements as Iraq leader,ok tell me now who has control of Iraq ?:).invasion of Iran is a big IMPOSSIBLE.Iran has intercontinental ballistic missiles and Iranian are not Arabs.actually they are anti Arabs.if you are able to "do" a vast country which is spreads from south of russia to north of Emirates with 80 millions of population ,ok come on, you are welcome !
the solving problem of middle east is never killing ,rather it's making "trust "
 
Commodity_Trader said:
:D Iran is not like Iraq .a very powerful and vast army .after invasion of Iraq by USA ,Iran took control of Iraq and elected one of it's elements as Iraq leader,ok tell me now who has control of Iraq ?:).invasion of Iran is a big IMPOSSIBLE.Iran has intercontinental ballistic missiles and Iranian are not Arabs.actually they are anti Arabs.if you are able to "do" a vast country which is spreads from south of russia to north of Emirates with 80 millions of population ,ok come on, you are welcome !
the solving problem of middle east is never killing ,rather it's making "trust "
More...
You're delusional. The Iranian military sucks.
 
Trader666 said:
You're delusional. The Iranian military sucks.
More...
if Iranian army is awful, why did USA issued a rigid sanctions against Iran ? why intercontinental ballistic missiles are part of negotiations and why western countries alarms about iran nuclear /chemical weapons / missiles power ?
you have some sort of paradox.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top