POLL: What is the World's Most Evil Religion?

Quote from Guardian Angel:

I'm not running away but I do have to sign off now.
We can pick up this discussion tommorow.

have a great evening.

What discussion Thunderdolt? All you do is keep pasting comments from websites and biblical passages, make illogical arguments and prove that you do not even understand the arguments put forth.....Ugh, now I'm wasting my time on this guy that we were supposed to have left behind a year and a half ago...........wow, still can't believe its been that long.
 
Quote from ARogueTrader:



Your projection of intellectual superiority fits with the pattern of failed theists who must necessarily convince others and themselves that they are correct in their belief systems, that they have made the right choice. Any crack in the armor of their belief system would lead them to re-experience the pain of their personal failure that led to their rejection of the discipline and practice of faith. You can easily find a theist who will say, "I don't know, but I do believe, I have faith." You will rarely find an open minded and honest atheist who will admit they might be wrong, and that they are actually just practicing a different belief system than the one they had before.


Actually, more often it is very religious people who push their views, not atheists nor agnostics. And open-minded could just as well include the open-mindedness to realize that you may be wrong. God might not exist, or God might exist but not have done any of the things in the bible or dictated that we live as the humans who wrote the bible said to.
 
Quote from I Missed Boat:



Actually, more often it is very religious people who push their views, not atheists nor agnostics. And open-minded could just as well include the open-mindedness to realize that you may be wrong. God might not exist, or God might exist but not have done any of the things in the bible or dictated that we live as the humans who wrote the bible said to.

Your conclusion may be spurious, as there are more religious people than not, so it very be well that the majority of people tend push their views on to others...whether their belief system is religious or atheistic.

My guess is that if people adopted atheism in the same manner people adopt religion, the numbers would be the same. It has to do with human nature in my opinion and a lack of faith in the system of choice.

I am open minded, in as much as I can say I don't know with the absolute mathematical certainty that a closed system like mathematics can provide. I am not an absolute being, I am human and therefore fallible, and seek to achieve absolute help which in my mind is the nature of God. I can seek truth through the limited mind, or I can choose to surrender my mind to God who is absolute and ask Him to give me absolute knowledge. It depends on whether or not someone is seeking absolute knowledge, or relative knowledge. All knowledge in this world is relative, as it comes from relative understanding and relative perceptions, not from absolute understanding or absolute perceptions.

That is why I admit I practice faith in the belief system of my choosing.

I also don't have mathematical certainty about many things in life, yet it doesn't keep me from moving forward toward my individual goals.

The resident atheists are not honest enough to admit they do the exact same thing with their belief systems.
 
Quote from Cutten:

Where is your evidence that life could not exist in a non-designed universe? If I use a random word generator long enough, at some point it will create the complete works of Shakespeare. This is not evidence for design, any more than that the existence of intelligent life on earth is evidence for design. Both are accountable for by unthinking processes completely lacking in any intelligent thought or design.

Come again?

Sonnet #66 by Shakespeare

Total of 535 characters, including only 26 letters and spaces.

Odds of getting a specific 5 letter word randomly -- 1 in over 14,000,000

Odds of getting just this Sonnet randomly? 1 in (27 to the 535 power). That's equivalent to 10^765 power. Number of seconds since the big bang -- 4.7304 x 10^17 ... There aren't enough plank constants of time available since the big bang to even scratch the surface of that one -- and that is just one of his shorter sonnets.

Sorry, but the monkey banging on a typewriter analogy for proof that anything can happen given enough time is horseshit in my opinion.
 
LMAOOO.... you are so completely incapable of arguing
that you have to completely fabricate what im saying now?!??!
A perfect strawman by definition.

I in fact have NEVER said or asserted this:
"axeman: NO. God does not exist because I said so. "

You once again PROVE to us all that you are completely
incapable of READING. You continue to assert that
I claim god does not exist.

Im seriously starting to think you have a severe mental
handicap. Or your delusional since you continue to attack
things which I never said, and seem to read things which are
not even there.

Seek help... I mean really.



peace

axeman





Quote from Guardian Angel:



GA: Do you believe in God?

axeman: I do not believe in God

GA: Can you prove that God does not exist?


axeman: NO. God does not exist because I said so.

GA: How did the world come into being?
axeman: I do not know. I do not care. I hate God. You are stupid.
Your arguments are dumb and beneath me. No one can prove me wrong because I have not admitted nor denied anything. I have not taken a stance on anything therefore I can not be wrong.
Religious people are stupid. I'm stupid. We are all stupid.

and you call this intelligent discourse?
You simply speak as one who has not studied the facts carefully enough to make a declarative statement. Your thinking is flawed and is unscientific.

You clearly are not willing to examine any evidence here but rather just listen to yourself talk.
 
Actually, you did not realize your ATHEISM was fantasy,.
you concluded that. There is a big difference between a conclusion of the mind, and reality independent of human thought. You don't have objective certainty or proof that your faith was not real. You simply made a choice.


See how fricken stupid your lame argument is??

When you CANT prove unbelievable supernatural claims
outside of your own mind then it IS fantasy.
Nothing more than a figment of your imagination.

There is a big difference between a conclusion of the mind, and reality independent of human thought.

NOW THAT IS SOME FUNNY SHIT COMING FROM YOU! LMAOOO!!
Isnt this EXACTLY what I have been asking of you???
**INDEPENDENT** verification of a reality OUTSIDE of just your head??!?!
What a fricken hypocrite!! Can you say double standard??? :D


As I have pointed out many times, you have NEVER provided
a shred of evidence that your FANTASY of god/faith exists
OUTSIDE of your mind.

But you continue to SPEW forth these LAME arguments
as if you know for certain that you are right.

Give it up 777, you have consistently FAILED to provide
any proof for your childhood fantasies.

In fact.... I have already PROVED just how flawed your
silly faith based system is in the passed.

Let me remind you.

I can find multiple people who have directly contradictory
knowledge to YOURS via the use of faith.

In fact...I FAITH right now that you are absolutely wrong.

This proves just how inconsistent your voo doo belief system
is and therefore proves how useless it is.

You have NEVER addressed this issue, except to take the
POMPOUS position that ONLY YOUR FAITH is true, and any
faith which contradicts yours must be false.

Of course, you NEVER provide a reason WHY this is the case
and why we should believe such nonsense.

If a madman tells me he hears voices from god that tell
him to shoot people, using your logic, his direct perceptions
must be accepted as true.

He is NOT simply a mentally ill FU**, he is using FAITH,
and the voices he hears MUST be true since he directly
experienced them.

Problem is, his internal voices are not testable, falsifiable
or verifiable....and here is the KEY part....*** JUST LIKE YOURS!!! ***

I have no way to tell the difference between this
SICKO MENTAL patient and YOU! :D

As far as im concerned, if you really think you have these
magical powers which allow ONLY YOU to communicate with
a mythical creator of the WHOLE universe, then I can
only conclude you have serious mental issues :D

In other words...Im wasting my time arguing with a mental patient :D

No wonder its always so easy to swat down your silly arguments.
You are mentally not able to defend yourself.
Oh man... now I feel bad :D


peace

axeman




Quote from ARogueTrader:



Actually, your did not realize your faith was fantasy, you concluded that. There is a big difference between a conclusion of the mind, and reality independent of human thought. You don't have objective certainty or proof that your faith was not real. You simply made a choice.

Many people have concluded reality throughout the ages intellectually, and have been wrong.

More honestly, you came to your own conclusion, which you accept as reality not only for you, but for all others, and have now adopted as your practice of faith in the same manner people practice faith in God. You turned your faith from God who by definition is Supreme, Eternal, etc. to faith in a limited material mind.

You may believe you worshiped a fantasy, but you have no proof that you did. For you would have to prove that God doesn't exist to prove that it was a fantasy.

That is your choice of course. Everyone makes a choice to trust something, and serve somebody.

In the words of Bob Dylan:

Gotta Serve Somebody
 
Quote from axeman:

Actually, you did not realize your ATHEISM was fantasy,.
you concluded that. There is a big difference between a conclusion of the mind, and reality independent of human thought. You don't have objective certainty or proof that your faith was not real. You simply made a choice.


See how fricken stupid your lame argument is??


Abusive language, hence ad hominem.

When you CANT prove unbelievable supernatural claims
outside of your own mind then it IS fantasy.
Nothing more than a figment of your imagination.


You cannot prove anyone's experience is imagination. You cannot even prove that you are not dreaming this very moment, and that this discussion isn't a figment of your imagination. You have no absolute point of reference, hence all realizations are relative to an assumption that is not absolute, and hence may be untrue. That which is true is absolutely true, not relatively true.

NOW THAT IS SOME FUNNY SHIT COMING FROM YOU! LOOM!!

Insincere comments don't deserve response.

Isnt this EXACTLY what I have been asking of you???
**INDEPENDENT** verification of a reality OUTSIDE of just your head??!?!
What a fricken hypocrite!! Can you say double standard??? :D


You have not been asking anything, you have been stating your opinion of what reality is, and then passing judgment on what is reality for others. You have not provided proof of ultimate reality of an absolute nature. When you can prove that you are not dreaming right now, that you are not imagining this entire process, they you can judge reality for others.

The concept of "proof" you are suggesting is relativistic and not absolute.

As I have pointed out many times, you have NEVER provided
a shred of evidence that your FANTASY of god/faith exists
OUTSIDE of your mind.


You claim someone else's reality fantasy, but you can provide no proof that your own reality is not a fantasy.

Prove that your perspective is of absolute reality first, otherwise you are just offering up opinion and faith.

But you continue to SPEW forth these LAME arguments
as if you know for certain that you are right.


Show me where I have claimed certainty. I claim to practice faith. It is you who practice certainty on the basis of something which is not certain. Is that reasonable?

Give it up 777, you have consistently FAILED to provide
any proof for your childhood fantasies.


Prove that you love another human being. Prove inner intent. Impossible, as you could be acting. Yet inner intent exists, as does love. We all know that, we just cannot prove it to anyone else. Inability to prove it to another person doesn't make it false.

In fact.... I have already PROVED just how flawed your
silly faith based system is in the passed.


No, you have proved you think you are certain, and you think you have proved something, but in fact you have not.

I can find multiple people who have directly contradictory
knowledge to YOURS via the use of faith.


First, you cannot prove that the practice of faith is the same as my practice of faith.

Secondly, the perceptions and experiences of others who have different experiences do not in themselves constitute a proof that contradictory perceptions and experiences are false. This is false reasoning.


In fact...I FAITH right now that you are absolutely wrong.

I don't doubt you do. You practice your atheism with full faith and confidence.

This proves just how inconsistent your voo doo belief system
is and therefore proves how useless it is.


You have proved nothing beyond having a faith in a different concept of what ultimate reality is.

You have NEVER addressed this issue, except to take the
POMPOUS position that ONLY YOUR FAITH is true, and any
faith which contradicts yours must be false.


False. I have never stated my faith is the only faith. What I have stated is that there can be only one faith in Absolute God. How it is practiced may differ according to one's understanding, but there is only one Supreme God, not two. Faith in Supreme God is a true faith, faith in less than supreme God is a false faith.

Of course, you NEVER provide a reason WHY this is the case
and why we should believe such nonsense.


Those who seek absolute knowledge, absolute happiness, perfect love, everlasting life would seek the source of those experiences. The source of those experiences is God.

People are free to seek whatever they like. If they seek limitations, they are free. If they seek absolute experineces, they seek that end.

If a madman tells me he hears voices from god that tell
him to shoot people, using your logic, his direct perceptions
must be accepted as true.


Who can say? I can doubt his experiences, but I have no certainty that what he says is false. Just as if someone says they see the color red where I see the color blue, who is to say what the real color is, and how it should be seen?

He is NOT simply a mentally ill FU**, he is using FAITH,
and the voices he hears MUST be true since he directly
experienced them.


He is labled by society as mentally ill according to the norms of the society. In the same way society labels religious belief as real and sane. The field of mental health has not concluded that faith in God is an illusion, faith is accepted as a part of human nauture and a means of knowing.

Problem is, his internal voices are not testable, falsifiable
or verifiable....and here is the KEY part....*** JUST LIKE YOURS!!! ***


No, they are not testable, only his actions are. If his actions are not within the realm of societal norms, he suffers the fate of his actions in society if they are harmful to others.

I have no way to tell the difference between this
SICKO MENTAL patient and YOU! :D


Then you have no way of observing behavior. Mental health is determined by behavior by mental health professionals, and they can determine if someone is sane or not on that basis. No one who is high functioning, yet at the same time has faith in God is deemed mentally ill by mental health professionals.

As far as im concerned, if you really think you have these
magical powers which allow ONLY YOU to communicate with
a mythical creator of the WHOLE universe, then I can
only conclude you have serious mental issues :D


As far as you are concerned is an opinion, nothing more. Fact is that I have never claimed to have magical powers. Prove that I said that. You can't, because I didn't say that.

In addition, I have never said that anyone cannot practice faith in Supreme God. Anone can practice faith in God. The ability is inherint within all human beings.

In other words...Im wasting my time arguing with a mental patient :D

Ad hominem, poisoning the well fallacy.

No wonder its always so easy to swat down your silly arguments.
You are mentally not able to defend yourself.
Oh man... now I feel bad :D


More ad hominem, verbal abuse, and drawing conclusions without proof.

For those who are reading this thread, can you see the tactics used by axeman here?

Can you understand why someone would behave so?

My belief is that because when someone is unable to get their way, or win an argument properly, they behave like a child and throw a tantrum.

axeman is trowing a tantrum, because of the innability to behave in an adult manner. This behavior is common among the failed theists I have encountered in my life.

Normally, the kind of name calling and assumptive conclusons without evidence I have seen from axeman are common to teenagers. They argue from emotion and feeling, and are unable to maintain composure when things don't go their way. I am sure others have seen this type of behavior before. Normally it concludes with slamming of doors and sulking, or sour grapes mentality.

Eventually axeman will claim he is "above" the discussion, claim not to have time, slam the door, and/or place someone on ignore in a very public display of emotion.

At least that has been his M.O. in the past, and I see no change in maturity or behavior.







 
Quote from Covertibility:



How is that possibly known?

I just used 15 billion years as an over-estimate. Apparently they have the universe's age pegged at 13.7 billion years, give or take a couple 100 million years.
 
Anger management
Often when one such as axeman loses a debate he resorts to name calling. When you can't successfully argue the point of the message you simply attack the messenger. LOL

You failed to clearly debate the issue. No wonder YOU hide behind the redefining of words so that you don't have to clearly argue the opposing objections to your position. You claim to be a soft atheist but yet you have not offered an intelligent alternative to argument of origins. You have chosen to rather ignore that side of the discussion simply because you do not want to examine the alternative arguments. It is easy to just say that a counter argument is false or silly and to simply ignore it. Thats not having an open mind. We can only have a good discussion when BOTH parties have an opened mind. I am clearly open to examining contrary evidence to my belief system. Are you? So far you have not demonstrated that. You still have yet to reply to my response to YOUR ridiculous claims and re-interpretation of Scripture.

ARogueTrader was right about your childish behavior.




Quote from ARogueTrader:

More ad hominem, verbal abuse, and drawing conclusions without proof.

For those who are reading this thread, can you see the tactics used by axeman here?

Can you understand why someone would behave so?

My belief is that because when someone is unable to get their way, or win an argument properly, they behave like a child and throw a tantrum.

axeman is trowing a tantrum, because of the innability to behave in an adult manner. This behavior is common among the failed theists I have encountered in my life.

Normally, the kind of name calling and assumptive conclusons without evidence I have seen from axeman are common to teenagers. They argue from emotion and feeling, and are unable to maintain composure when things don't go their way. I am sure others have seen this type of behavior before. Normally it concludes with slamming of doors and sulking, or sour grapes mentality.

Eventually axeman will claim he is "above" the discussion, claim not to have time, slam the door, and/or place someone on ignore in a very public display of emotion.

At least that has been his M.O. in the past, and I see no change in maturity or behavior.







[/B]


This is what I believe:


"In the begining God created the heavens and the earth."

Genesis 1:1

This is why I believe it:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=25375&perpage=6&pagenumber=1

Quote from axeman:

"YOU have NOT demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt as to persuade me to believe in the notion that the Bible is ridiculous... "



Yeah right....isn't obvious? Lets see here...

1) Magic dude created the whole universe and all of us, but nothing had to create HIM

You clearly do not understand the doctrine of divinity.


2) Water turning to blood

Once we have demonstrated that the Bible is divine rather than human in origin it is not unreasonable to conceive of God's intervention and complete control of nature.


3) God sends wild animals sent to kill infants, but THOU SHALT NOT KILL!!

God's judgement is vastly more infinite than yours or mine. If you can not explain the universe how can you understand the mind of God?

4) Hippie dude coming back to life after proclaiming to die for OUR sins.

The proof of the resurrection is a proven historical fact. You simply have not done your homework on the subject of Biblical history.


5) Exodus 20:15 "Thou shalt not steal."


Versus: Luke 19:29-34 "[Jesus] sent two of his disciples, Saying, Go ye into the village . . . ye shall find a colt tied, whereon yet never man sat: loose him, and bring him hither. And if any man ask you, Why do ye loose him? thus shall ye say unto him, Because the Lord hath need of him. . . . And as they were loosing the colt, the owners thereof said unto them, W
hy loose ye the colt? And they said, The Lord hath need of him."

You have obviously missed the point here. It can be logically determined that the owner of the colt was ready to contribute to the work of God and seeing that once confronted with the fact that "the Lord had need of it" they were willing and ready to give.

Nice try.




6) Throw in some slavery:
Leviticus 25:45-46 "Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, . . . and they shall be your possession . . . they shall be your bondmen forever."

How many times do I have to explain to you that in the O.T. Isreal was under theocratic rule. Isreal was to conquer the land of Canaan and were given specific instructions.

Joel 3:8 "And I will sell your sons and your daughters into the hand of the children of Judah, and they shall sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far off: for the Lord hath spoken it."

You really don't get it do you. Isreal was punished because of their sin and disobedience and therefore were taken into captivity.


Again your lack of ancient times and customs is staggering.
If ancient Greece slavery was likened to "Employer/Employee" relationships. Slaves had rights. Slaves were to be paid decent wages. If one was in debt then they would have to work off the debt and once completed were released from service. Some slaves stayed on with their "masters" after being released because they were treated so fairly and paid very well.
No different than today's nanny or butler or personal assistant.






7) Oooops...god changes his mind after saying he never changes.
I guess he must be bipolar.

Malachi 3:6 "For I am the Lord; I change not."

Genesis 6:6,7 "And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth . . . And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth . . . for it repenteth me that I have made him.

Again your lack of understanding and Biblical interpretation is laughable. The Hebrew word given here to express "repenteth" expresses sadness for the failure of man to obey God when given the choice and opportunity to do so.






8) Is god confused here? Truly bipolar

Exodus 20:5 "For I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation." (Repeated in Deuteronomy 5:9)

Ezekiel 18:20 "The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father."


Yes God is jealous over his creation. "Thou shall not worship other god's."


9) Gee....wish he would make up his sick mind :d

Psalm 145:9 "The Lord is good to all."

Isaiah 45:7 "I make peace and create evil. I the Lord do all these things."

Again the judgement of God is perfect were as man can not judge righteously because he is imperfect.

The Hebrew word given here is a direct reference to good and evil in a sense the evil is a direct consequence for disobeying God law.



10) Wow!!! What a setup. God is worse than the mob!


James 1:13 "Let no man say . . . I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man."

Genesis 22:1 "And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham."

This is getting rather boring. Do your homework before making stupid comments about things you have not taken the time to understand.

God did not "tempt" Abraham with evil but rather he "tested" Abraham to see if he would obey God. The Hebrew word used here is also used in other places throughout the Old Testament.





11) Hmmmm your supposed to believe in this fairy tale, but no
one has even ever seen him?

Wow. what a lame argument. And from someone of such intellectual prowess.

I've never been to China but that does not prove that China does not exist. C'mon dude.

John 1:18 "No man hath seen God at any time."
Exodus 33:20 "Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live."

Oh wait a second!!!

Genesis 32:30 "For I have seen God face to face."
Exodus 33:11 "And the Lord spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend."

Gee... what a liar!!!



O.K. another apparent contradiction right? NOT.

NO man has seen God face to face in all his fullness.
It would take to long to walk you through the Greek lexicon on this one. Once again nice try.


Shall I go on???

Oh wait.... I don't know a damn thing about the christian bible.

So far you have demonstrated that you do. Just because you disagree with the morality of ancient antiquities does not mean that it is not true. You can not rewrite these historical events and simply dismiss them because you don't agree with the morality of ancient theocratic rule.

I've had tougher arguments debating the Hamitic Hypothesis.
You are truly wasting my time here with this nonsense.
You have dodged the real issue which is about origins.
I have given you a rational explanation but you have only name called.
 
Back
Top