POLL: What is the World's Most Evil Religion?

Wow...you really must be stupid or something.
You just dont get it do you?

I was showing 777 how idiotic is constant poisoning of the
well is.

The point of this post is that my statement *IS incorrect *
***because*** Im using 777's FLAWED logic.

But it went straight over the top of your head.
Just more evidence of your mental incompetence.

peace

axeman



Quote from Guardian Angel:

Quote from axeman:

Your verbal abuse continues unabated, further evidence of deep seated issues with your own personal failure with atheism, and lack of acceptance of that failure.

YOU are the only one who is rage-FULL at the notion that YOU are dead wrong and have been caught with your pants down.

.........LOL:p
 
Quote from I Missed Boat:



So the fact that many people find happiness in believing in heaven is itself proof that heaven exists??

No.

I probably went one step too far in the analysis. But at any rate, you can take it to the level that if your happiness is enhanced by living a principle in a book, then you can safely say, "that principle is good."

And yes, there might be good principles hidden in otherwise unredeeming books.

And to the point about belief, I realize that belief is doing something, but belief in and of itself isn't enough. You have to actually do something in order to know of its value. Simply believing in an abstract idea like heaven, most likely won't make a person happy. If a person believes in heaven and therefore takes steps to improve their lives, serve those around them and take care of their families and loved ones, then no doubt that that belief will have enriched their life as well as the lives of those around them.
 
Though there are a variety of possible responses to this question, there are three traditional responses that predominate in Western society:

(1) God does not exist- atheism
(2) we cannot know whether God exist- agnosticism
(3) a personal God does exist- theism.



This again shows your glaring ignorance.
It leaves out the most popular atheist position, which is:

(4) I do not believe in god/gods - ATHEISM (The majority type of atheism)

#1 is called STRONG atheism, which is NOT the typical atheist position. So you like to use this as a strawman argument.


Gee.... how many times do I have to explain this?

Apparently, you are incapable of LEARNING as well :D

This is really getting pathetic.
Im arguing with someone who cant reason, doesn't understand
the terms, AND is incapable of learning.

peace

axeman
 
Axeman,

If you are truly relying on unemotional logic for your atheist belief and arguments, then why are your responses so overtly hostile toward those who would take the other side of the argument?
 
Quote from axeman:


the default
position is WEAK atheism. Which is NON-belief based
on a lack of evidence.

peace

axeman

It's nice to have a back door escape route when you are cornered. LOL.

Hmmmm. Guardian Angel presented you will very powerful arguments that suggest that tier IS evidence to the contrary but you fail to recognize it. You really don't want to discuss the topic with an open mind but rather Bash and name call. You run away from arguments presented against your potion by name calling and belittling.

Your not intelligent but rather precocious and ignorant.
You are not scientific. A true student of learning would examine the evidence at hand openly and honestly without abusive language. You are the sorriest excuse for a atheist I have ever known.

You have thrown the baby out with the bathwater. Child Protective Services should have you thrown in jail.


[/B]
 
Quote from TriPack:

Axeman,

If you are truly relying on unemotional logic for your atheist belief and arguments, then why are your responses so overtly hostile toward those who would take the other side of the argument?
cause we're sick of dealing with this obvious bs over and over.
 





Quote from axeman:
It leaves out the most popular atheist position, which is:

(4) I do not believe in god/gods - ATHEISM (The majority type of atheism)

On what grounds?

where is your evidence to contradict the reasons given against your position?

From what I have seen GA has given very good scientific arguments as to what he believes and why he believes it.
You on the other hand have not. You are still stuck on definitions and the redefining of words to suite your needs.

How pathetic.
 
"If you are truly relying on unemotional logic"


Tripack,

I hope you have noticed this is not the case.

I usually debate technically without the Ad Hominem attacks.

But this guy is frankly, just so idiotic, and its so obvious
that it wouldnt matter if I debated in my usual
technical manner, because it gets me no credit.
So I resorted to a faster and looser aggressive debating style.
The guy is simply an idiot, and im debating at a lower level.
Its a little embarassing :D Wrestling with a pig ya know... :D


This thread is a joke, so im not bothering to debate
perfectly well.

Your previous post was reasonable. I would just add
that as Missed the Boat already pointed out, we are not
cocerned wether or not biblical principles enhance
someones life (because I do believe this occurs).

We are simply concerned with IS IT TRUE???
THAT is the issue at hand.
I think most atheists would concede that biblical
principles DO enhace SOME peoples lives.
Just not mine, theirs, or all peoples.

peace

axeman




Quote from TriPack:

Axeman,

If you are truly relying on unemotional logic for your atheist belief and arguments, then why are your responses so overtly hostile toward those who would take the other side of the argument?
 
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Wow.... the completely biased idiot twin brother of GA
supports him!

Oh my...we are soooo surprised! NOT! :D

LMAOOOOOO... omg that is funny.

GA has proven beyond doubt how CLUELESS he is
and you really think he won this????
Your are as stupid as him if you believe this.


peace

axeman




Quote from CONTRARIAN:




You are just upset because GA has torn you a new ass!
 
Back
Top