Quote from Cutten:
I don't see how that follows. Actions infringe rights - historical words and teachings do not. The *practise* of religion would be evil if that practise infringed rights (e.g. stoning rape victims, human sacrifice, burning witches at the stake, conquest of heathen societies etc). However, most Muslims do not go round trying to kill infidels, quoting the Koran as justification. Since the majority of Muslims live peacably and get along fine with others, it would be misleading to characterise the religion (as practised by the majority of its followers) as evil.
.
Maybe not "most" Muslims, but very significant numbers either (a) do do just that or (b) wholeheartedly support such actions and the Koranic justification for such actions and (c) have very significant portions of the religious leadership, which in Islam is endowed with the responsibilty of determining what passes for good Islam that demand just such actions.
As I'm sure we are in agreement that such actions are "evil", then one must surely at least acknowledge that it is at least a debatable point whether the religion itself ought to be classified as such.
And, within the context of this thread, if we admit that all religions, or at least all three judaic religions, have some rather unsavory aspects, then Islam would qualify as the most evil.

