POLL (Trading): If you knew then what you knew now...

[b]POLL (Trading): If you knew then what you knew now, what would you change?[/b]

  • Change brokers

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • Learned more about psychology

    Votes: 6 6.7%
  • Money management

    Votes: 13 14.4%
  • Become more risk averse

    Votes: 4 4.4%
  • Learn more about TA

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • Avoid TA

    Votes: 4 4.4%
  • Learn more about fundamentals

    Votes: 2 2.2%
  • Fundamentals don't help

    Votes: 2 2.2%
  • Gone into the industry, IB, prop firm, hedge fund, etc.

    Votes: 5 5.6%
  • Studied engineering/programming

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • Never trade

    Votes: 4 4.4%
  • Prevent my friends from trading

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • start my own advisory service

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Study price action until my eyeballs fell out

    Votes: 21 23.3%
  • Found a mentor

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • Focused on a different instrument (class)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Start with more money

    Votes: 5 5.6%
  • Start with less money/Papertrade for a LONG time

    Votes: 8 8.9%
  • Would have studied more about successful traders

    Votes: 1 1.1%

  • Total voters
    90
Quote from dozu888:

wow, most votes for price action.... I am in good company.

Haha...I didn't think many would agree on that one too! Either we are all lemmings or really think like good traders :p
 
Quote from dozu888:

wow, most votes for price action.... I am in good company.

If I were you, I would be really worried. That category has over 30% of the respondents. If it is true that 95% of the traders lose money, then traders in that category certainly belong to the 95% losers.
 
Quote from 4DTrader:

If I were you, I would be really worried. That category has over 30% of the respondents. If it is true that 95% of the traders lose money, then traders in that category certainly belong to the 95% losers.

That 95% lose money is a belief, no one knows for sure. The question is, "what would you differently?" so this reflects improved knowledge. Thirdly, ET is a traders' community, so the likelihood is that there are a higher % of successful traders than the worldwide "beginner" set.

Most of the successful traders tend to gravitate towards price action, so I suggest the number is rather accurate.
 
Fund your account with money you don't need. I traded with money I needed to use for a ballon payment on real estate due 18 months down the road. (There's some risk for ya).

The clock ran out on my winning streek. My errors redeemed. It wouldn't have been life changing money by some standards but I would have been exhonerated. Nutmeg will rise again.
 
Quote from rcanfiel:

Most of the successful traders tend to gravitate towards price action.

You forgot to add "I think that..." or "In my opinion..."

I am not aware of any empirical evidence either for or against that weasel statement. Practically speaking, such evidence would be extremely hard to come by.

If anything, I would not be surprised to find out that a higher % of fully automated, system traders - themselves almost certainly in the minority - are profitable than of the other kinds of traders. Your poll is conspicuously missing a choice along the lines of "Learn more about developing ATS." (Studied engineering/programming is somewhat related, but not nearly close enough... there is much more to ATS R&D.)
 
you forgot the option of I'd change nothing... LOL

or "skip going to university so I could start trading 4 years earlier"

- mnx
 
Quote from rcanfiel:

That 95% lose money is a belief, no one knows for sure. The question is, "what would you differently?" so this reflects improved knowledge. Thirdly, ET is a traders' community, so the likelihood is that there are a higher % of successful traders than the worldwide "beginner" set.

Most of the successful traders tend to gravitate towards price action, so I suggest the number is rather accurate.

I don't want to discourage you from conducting polls (none of my business), but the defects of your polls must be exposed so that traders reading your poll results won't be misled. So what I am going to say is not against you, but to serve the traders involved.

For a survey sample's result (e.g. "most of the successful traders tend to gravitate towards price action") to be valid (i.e., generalizable to the population), certain criteria must be met:

1. sample is randomly selected
2. sample is NOT self-selected
3. every member of the trading population has an equal opportunity of being selected
4. sample has a large enough size

Otherwise, the results of your survey are invalid.

I am still puzzled at your conclusion of "most of the successful traders." Your poll never asked the filter question of "Are you a successful trader? If yes, proceed to answer the following question." How do you know the respondents are successful traders?
 
I would become a top secret agent and stash away as many of the toys as I could and then use them to kill and torture all the lying SOB's in the trading business. I admit to falling for any number of the get rich easy BS'ers when I got started, and while I take full responsibility for being stupid, I would also still want to take out the trash to prevent others from going through all that garbage. :D
 
Back
Top