Dragged this rough draft of the latest UN resolution off the Net. Where exactly I won't tell you, but I can say with confidence that it is also where msfe finds much of his outstanding and objective material:
Recalling all its previous relevant resolutions, in particular its resolutions 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, 678 (1990) of 29 November 1990, 686 (1991) of 2 March 1991, 687 (1991) of 3 April 1991, 688 (1991) of 5 April 1991, blah blah blah, etc.,
Recalling that in its resolution 687 (1991) the council declared that Saddam could save his sorry ass only by agreeing to the conditions of the previous resolutions and disarming;
Recalling that resolution 1441 (2002), while acknowledging that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations, still gave him more time to play games and shoot his shotgun into the air,
Recalling that, nonetheless Jaques Chirac is a backstabbing son of a bitch,
Recalling that in its resolution 1441 (2002) the council decided that false statements or omissions in the declaration submitted by Iraq pursuant to that resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with and cooperate fully in the implementation of, that resolution, would constitute a further material breach, not that we needed another one to hang Saddam by his ugly mustache and let his people use him for a pinata,
Recalling that the subsequent declaration submitted by Iraq contained more false statements than an Oliver Stone movie,
Noting, that in that context, that in its resolution 1441 (2002), the council recalled that it has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations,
Noting that 'serious consequences' to the French apparently means being forced to shower more than once a week,
Noting also, that the only thing the Russians could recall was the size of their Iraqi oil contracts,
Reaffirming the commitment of all member states to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Iraq, Kuwait, and the neighboring states,
Noting, however, that a commitment to security from the French typically means you'll be lined up against a wall and shot while the French sit on their snotty asses and eat brie on the Riviera,
Mindful of its primary responsibility under the charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international peace and security,
Aware, however, that the U.N. is about as responsible as a baby shower hosted by Michael Jackson and Woody Allen,
Recognizing the threat Iraqâs noncompliance with council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security,
Recognizing that Hussein's continued existence poses a threat of more Hollywood nincompoops annoying the crap out of all of us,
Determined to secure full compliance with its decisions and to restore international peace and security in the area,
Well, determined to pretend we are, anyway,
Acting under Chapter VII of the charter of the United Nations,
Noting that if we don't vote for this, the U.S. and Britain will do it anyway and we'll look like idiots,
Decides that Iraq has failed to take the final opportunity afforded to it in resolution 1441 (2002).
Sooooo, where and when?
