>>It's my real first name. Not even a nick.<<
>Perhaps that is so Lance. But it does make one wonder when one sees someone, who has only just joined this chat site, come up with such strong opnions which are so contrary to the majority of contributors.
I read one contributor. I replied. I did not know the majority opinion, nor would it have made any difference to me in any case. This is not a popularity contest. The majority view of many things in life is incorrect, and often downright foolish. Ask Colombus. In the great game of trading, do we seek the majority opinion to verify our own decisions? Of course not. We suspect that the majority opinion is, in fact, foolish. Isn't it interesting how differently we regard majority opinion in various situations.
>Seeing those desperate odd people, so anxious to win an argument, reminds me of those labourites who, at election time, go out of their way to vote several times. Once in their own name and thence several times in dead people's names (whose name still appears on the electoral roll).
>freealways
I did appreciate your comment, however. Thank you.
I was hoping for something a bit more challenging in the way of a response from candletrader, but then it seems he'd rather hide behind cheap retorts like "ROFL" and "STUPID", than to come out and do honest intellectual battle. So be it. We are known and judged by the arguments we make, and just as importantly, by the way that we make those arguments.
Have a nice trading day, all. I'm off to bed here soon in The Big Mikan.
