Why wouldn't it have made more sense to return them to their former homes? Wouldn't that have been the compassionate thing to do?
If you were kidnapped and taken to a foreign country and forced to work as a slave laborer, would you expect that country to make you a citizen if you were freed?
I suspect that it had a lot to do with the republicans seeing a lot of potential voters in the freed slaves, much like the phony compassion we see now from democrats for illegal aliens. Unleashing the freed slaves on the Southern states, which is where the vast majority were located, was a form of post-War punishment. You can bet if 90% of the slaves lived in massachusetts and New York, they would have seen things much differently. It's awfully easy to preach morality when someone else has to pay the price for it.
If you were kidnapped and taken to a foreign country and forced to work as a slave laborer, would you expect that country to make you a citizen if you were freed?
I suspect that it had a lot to do with the republicans seeing a lot of potential voters in the freed slaves, much like the phony compassion we see now from democrats for illegal aliens. Unleashing the freed slaves on the Southern states, which is where the vast majority were located, was a form of post-War punishment. You can bet if 90% of the slaves lived in massachusetts and New York, they would have seen things much differently. It's awfully easy to preach morality when someone else has to pay the price for it.