Poll: Ifyou were forced to make a choice between the 2,which option would you choose?

Which of the 2 is more emasculating?

  • Sawing 1 of your own testicles with a rusty hacksaw....

    Votes: 14 51.9%
  • Becoming a male nurse....

    Votes: 13 48.1%

  • Total voters
    27
Quote from Lucrum:



How is it you've been a member for all of a month yet you consider yourself an expert on everyone here?

He didn't say he was an expert, its some sort of project his brother is doing . . . luke.:mad:.
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

1) hostile, juvenile
What you have here is unfortunately (tilts leftist) the best in moderation on the web.

On other sites like huffpoo, common dreams etc if you make too strong a case (conservative or libertarian) you get banned even if you are not otherwise in violation of their TOS.


2)"hiding behind screen names"
yeah like exposing your real thoughts on facebook is such a good idea!

Precisely why this is such a trove!

Joe, will not ban for extreme controversy, so over time this emboldens a segment of the population to be more candid. It really is a nice setup.:)
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Commenting that MAYBE women should never have been allowed to vote translates into hate for women? I don't think those not paying income or property taxes and or receiving welfare shouldn't be able to vote. No maybe about it. Pragmatism doesn't automatically = hate in my book

for liberals hate speech is defined as: Inconvenient facts and opinions they don't entertain.

It was for good reason only property owners had the right to vote.

The demise of the west will be at the hands of politicians who've exploited those who've been given the right to vote without skin in the game.
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

1) hostile, juvenile
What you have here is unfortunately (tilts leftist) the best in moderation on the web.

On other sites like huffpoo, common dreams etc if you make too strong a case (conservative or libertarian) you get banned even if you are not otherwise in violation of their TOS.


2)"hiding behind screen names"
yeah like exposing your real thoughts on facebook is such a good idea!

Bad choice of wording, hiding I mean. I meant to say you are all protected, not a bad thing. I'm sorry for that.

And, yes, another thing we found odd, and not on all the sites, but some, is the no show or ignore capacity. Odd, in that these are discussion boards. How can one discuss coherently when they ignore the other side. Perhaps Congress should consider this, or perhaps they already have.
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

for liberals hate speech is defined as: Inconvenient facts and opinions they don't entertain.

It was for good reason only property owners had the right to vote.

The demise of the west will be at the hands of politicians who've exploited those who've been given the right to vote without skin in the game.

Again, nothing to do with our little treatise, but I think that if we were all honest with each other, that both sides use inconvenient facts. The liberal slant is easily read, of course. The right is seems to be the same, only louder, and perhaps too conservative in that we really want to win. We, as in conservative, are fearful of Obama, not vice versa. I just wish we had a better ticket than Romney. There, I said it, sorry friends. As I said, I can't vote for Obama, and may have to stay home.

Nothing to do with our little project.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Precisely why this is such a trove!

Joe, will not ban for extreme controversy, so over time this emboldens a segment of the population to be more candid. It really is a nice setup.:)

The old yahoo boards were quite good too.

It's sad that freedom of speech is a rarity these days.
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

The old yahoo boards were quite good too.

It's sad that freedom of speech is a rarity these days.

We have 2 yahoo boards in the mix as well. I did notice some censorship, not really sure why.
 
Quote from indythink75:

I think that if we were all honest with each other, that both sides use inconvenient facts.

Only one side calls that HATE SPEECH.

Ironically it's their euphemism for talk radio, I guess they never listened to Air America very closely (specifically Randi Rhodes, and Mike Malloy ).
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

And here is Lucrum, the wild ass amongst us, defensive and adversarial. Kicking in every direction. Please continue, Indy. Please do. This is getting interesting.
:confused:

You sure are full of shit.
 
LOL. Indystink - just another liberal moron who made my ingnore list many moons ago. His analysis is akin to a liberal's broken view of the world.

Keep it up Indystink. It seems some of your liberal compatriates hold you up as some Marxist God. But the real thinkers here know how limited your thinking is in reality.
 
Back
Top