Quote from firestorm:
In the immortal words of Benny Hill JJ
When you ASSuME, you make an ASS out of U and ME
And just so you know, Saxon22 is desperately searching for blacks to hang by the neck at his next KKK meeting... you don't know what you are talking about where he is concerned
Quote from stereo70:
gerry875 wrote:
Your questions are as irrelevant as the poll itself. I can't believe the amount of people who won't read or cannot understand the material TO BEGIN WITH -- much less ask a bunch of random questions they find "intelligent". This is not some "easy" method...it takes time/work -- it's like people are under the impression that there is some implicit guarantee.

well - I did never claim that futures trading is easy at all.
it is your master guru who claims this again and again in the last 4 years or so. that anyone who likes can learn this and make tons of money - so...
but no matter how difficult or easy this is - there should be so far many many traders in the usa doing this at top level - if not - why not??
Sure ... What I am looking for is a clear explanation of the method. Doesn't "iterative refinement" come later?Quote from firestorm:
Here it is put in simple terms
http://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/n2003/IterativeRefinementMod.html
That clears everything up doesn't it
Quote from stereo70:
gerry875 wrote:
However, if you would take the time to read the material, you would understand better the concept of iterative refinement as the operative dynamic going on here.
Your skepticism is misdirected; the idea of mastery (in anything) is that the task or effort becomes second nature w/out mental hesitation. The easy part comes after the hard part.
Thanks for the info. I'll put every SCT proponent on ignore.Quote from firestorm:
Oh you wont get that, Jack cant afford to be clear and concise, otherwise his method would be exposed as a simple little channel and volume system that nobody is making money from
4 years and not one of them has the balls to call live trades