POLL for traders who trade the Jack Hershey method(s) in real time with real money

If you actually trade with real money using Jack's method in real time, please vote:

  • I have traded Jack's method(s) for over 6 months with real money in real time, and I [b]made[/b] mon

    Votes: 64 32.0%

  • I have traded Jack's method(s) for over 6 months with real money in real time, and I [b]lost[/b] mon

    Votes: 136 68.0%
  • Total voters
    200
"The others would have lost money anyway and if 38 can do it successfully there is hope that the others can find out what "they" did wrong and LEARN."

Nothing like making a sweeping generalization to really prove your point Joab.
 
Quote from Joab:

So 38 people out of 100 are making money with a totally FREE method.

I say that's a HUGE success.

Congratulations Jack !!!
More...

Conventional wisdom is that 95% of traders don't make money and of the 5% that do, they blow out accounts occasonally!! And most of them paid dearly to aquire that CW!! No wonder they are kicking their stall like a mule that doesn't like to work.
 
I believe if we held a poll on penis size, it would be about as accurate as this. And who's to say that you Grobians didn't pad the vote with aliases?

P.S. I have no aliases and did NOT vote.
Quote from Bearbelly:

Do you really think this poll is a true reflection of things? I know one detractor of Jacks who has at least 6 aliases and Ill bet he voted each of them. Some on the other side may have done the same thing. In any case I cannot take this poll seriously.
More...
 
Quote from maxpi:

Conventional wisdom is that 95% of traders don't make money and of the 5% that do, they blow out accounts occasonally!! And most of them paid dearly to aquire that CW!! No wonder they are kicking their stall like a mule that doesn't like to work.
More...

I agree and I can tell you that of those 95% there are a good number of them that if you tried to teach them how to thread a needle, they would still try to stick the thread in their own eye.
 
Yikes! I've been spelling it "Grobian!" Is that incorrect, or is it an acceptable variant?
Quote from hypostomus:

Grobean aliases? I think not! They don't have any personality, much less multiples.
More...
 
When I and mine first started punning on the various faithfuls' names, I used Grobean because of the convention established by Jacobean, both names ending in b. Mais, ca ne fout rien! Perhaps we should use 'eans and the 'ians to distinguish various first cousins among the familiarly familiar inbred. (You never did confirm your gender, BTW.)
 
You're clearly the expert on these matters, so I'll defer to you and use "Grobean" until/unless you issue further guidance on distinguishing among the inbred. Thanks!
Quote from hypostomus:

When I and mine first started punning on the various faithfuls' names, I used Grobean because of the convention established by Jacobean, both names ending in b. Mais, ca ne fout rien! Perhaps we should use 'eans and the 'ians to distinguish various first cousins among the familiarly familiar inbred. (You never did confirm your gender, BTW.)
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top