POLL for traders who trade the Jack Hershey method(s) in real time with real money

[virgin]

Jack makes me think of my 4 year old who wants attention all the time.

They say getting old is getting childish again

 

[Trader666]

I didn't think I'd get a straight answer from you.

Let me try again: are you or any of your "PhDs" participating in the CNBC trading contest? And if so, under what nic(s)? Because showing results after the contest is over proves NOTHING, as multiple entry scams are older than you.

Quote from jack hershey:

Jack Hershey

I was invited

I said yes.

They asked me to submit Q's for show.

I did. I am, in effect, a ringer for the show.

They said:

Security will ask for your photo ID and a copy of this email.

Its for the CNBC.COM Million Dollar Portfolio Challenge.

I used the name trader666 which is famous they tell me. But to be on the show I have to use a first and last name that they could verify by phone which two people did separately. I asked for your phone number long ago so you could be on show. I told you to pm it to me. They have a bio on me as the interview result. I pretended to be trader666 for the interview.

I knew as soon as the people at CNBC got wind of your entry (through employees there) that you would be asked to be on TV.

What can I do???

 

[Trader666]

Geez Spydie, it looks like you're the one with her undies in a bunch! Might that be because you and some of your grape kool-aid drinking buddies have multiple entries in the CNBC contest?

IF you are participating, the only way you'll have any credibility is to let us know the nics NOW...

Quote from Spydertrader:

Lighten up Francis.

I have never seen a woman like you, get her panties into such a bunch, as you do over something posted on a web site.

The quote to which you referred has Jack indicating you may get to see him on CNBC. To me, that means he may find himself on camera. I did not see Jack say why he may find himself on camera.

Rather than jump (no leap) to conclusions, why not simply ask, "Hey Jack, Why (and more importantly, when ) can we expect to see you on CNBC?"

I realize TYPING YOUR POST IN ALL CAPS adds so much more drama to the discussion, but you really get your panties tied all up into a knot over what this 73 year old man posts?

Quite comical.

- Spydertrader

 

[hypostomus]

666, are you really a girl? I'm horrified I talked dirty to you in PMs. (Did you like it?)

 

[jack hershey]

Quote from taowave:

LOL..Very amusing...I like when you chose to be decipherable...

What do you say Jack??Would you consider starting up an EOD journal with whatever rules you chose to trade by as well as openly disclose??

Unless you love the "attention"....

I am glad that I am getting the appropriate level of decipherability. On target for you and still missing the market for virgin who is seeing AGM's.....lol


The journal is up and recently (within an hour) we made the decision to post the results of my review of equities journal III as a wrap up of PVT to take it to expert level. I am well into the hiliter stage and the postings will be more of a textual nature for the slots of the learning model that you already have as a graphic.

Along side that, I was planning on doing a dual run down to take into account a person who is still a full time employee and who is fast tracking capital accumulation to shift to full time trading (which may include transferring the template to commodities trading and equties sector rotation.)

What we are doing is transparent on the equities and we hope everyone understands that.

The CNBC stuff is all EOD oriented and I will slip the Q's that are coming up for that in after their use there.

As you know a normal working person is not subject to the CNBC rules per se simply because the economizing CNBC did to run the contest wrecked the real aspects of trading were a person to be fully employed and not monitoring during the day.

All CNBC trades in the contest happen at the same time, and, for convenience, CNBC chose to assign the entry value as that fictional time and value.

So leading indicators of price that real traders (either employed or trading) using the methods will be posted for you side by side so the differences are clear.

We will be moving up to expert in this pass, as stated in January.

As usual, it will not be possible to do this to just provide the three emotional constructs of support, comfort and confidence. There will be the usual tattoo of fear, anxiety and anger, as expressed by the detractors that have every right in a public forum to be examples of what they misread in the posts I make to be helpful.

This is my main job for 2007 in the PVT and SCT approaches that I advocate.

When I appear over there soon, I hope that the standards set by Spyder and practitioners can continue and that the sort of thing going on in the six concurrent detractor threads can just be kept there by distributing all the stuff over those six continuing locations fueled by fear, anxiety and anger, All of which needs to be vented as shown by the recent scientific testing and solution generating of such people by Peterson, Lo , Repkin. Goleman and to some extent by coaches like CBOT's Shull and the Olympic coach turned financial coach, Kiev.

 

[Spydertrader]

Quote from Trader666:

Geez Spydie, it looks like you're the one with her undies in a bunch! Might that be because you and some of your grape kool-aid drinking buddies have multiple entries in the CNBC contest?

If you are participating, the only way you'll have any credibility is to let us know the nics NOW...

I do not know what prompted your delusional fantasy that I had participated in any CNBC Challenge. Most people who actually trade real money in the markets don't bother with online fantasy stock games. However, I do wish you luck as you continue to 'invest' your play money online.

Once again, like so many other examples, you get it wrong. Not surprising for a woman of your intellect.

Since you continue to experience reading comprehension issues, I'll type very slowly .....

I have No involvement with CNBC, their challenge, or as an audience member. In fact when Jack plans to attend the CNBC show, I plan to be spending a week in the Dominican Republic enjoying the sun, surf and sand.

Real profits spend, Fantasyland dollars do not. Enjoy your fantasy role playing game.

Clear enough for you?

- Spydertrader

 

[jack hershey]

Quote from Trader666:

I didn't think I'd get a straight answer from you.

Let me try again: are you or any of your "PhDs" participating in the CNBC trading contest? And if so, under what nic(s)? Because showing results after the contest is over proves NOTHING, as multiple entry scams are older than you.

You will just have to settle for an every Friday prime time 1 hour weekly television show about the contest. I believe you are also able to monitor the CNBC blogs that they have running. If they are asking me how well the blogs are working, I assume that they will be asking you too if they feel like it.

It is not my job to be a support service for your whims about a contest.

There is nothing I can do about how the contest works and when people are told what.


I am, obviously, not allowed to inform you in advance of a show what is going on in that show. Get real.

You quoted some conversation I had that was responsive to an inquery by another person to me. Get real.

I am a ringer with regard to CNBC and its productions.

 

[Trader666]

Speaking of reading comprehension issues and intellect... I didn't say you were participating... I asked. That's what the question mark means.

Also, you have absolutely zero knowledge of what I trade and when I trade it so you're the one with the delusional fantasies.

Finally, if you really were doing well trading you wouldn't be going to the Dominican Republic... that's the poor man's island getaway. Have fun anyway...

Quote from Spydertrader:

I do not know what prompted your delusional fantasy that I had participated in any CNBC Challenge. Most people who actually trade real money in the markets don't bother with online fantasy stock games. However, I do wish you luck as you continue to 'invest' your play money online.

Once again, like so many other examples, you get it wrong. Not surprising for a woman of your intellect.

Since you continue to experience reading comprehension issues, I'll type very slowly .....

I have No involvement with CNBC, their challenge, or as an audience member. In fact when Jack plans to attend the CNBC show, I plan to be spending a week in the Dominican Republic enjoying the sun, surf and sand.

Real profits spend, Fantasyland dollars do not. Enjoy your fantasy role playing game.

Clear enough for you?

- Spydertrader

 

[Trader666]

So are you participating or not? If so, under what name(s)? Don't pretend you can't answer. And no, they won't be asking for me because I am NOT participating.

You're a ringer for CNBC? How so? The definition I found for "ringer" at dictionary.com that made the most sense to me is: "any person or thing that is fraudulent; fake or impostor." Is that what yoiu meant?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ringer

Quote from jack hershey:

You will just have to settle for an every Friday prime time 1 hour weekly television show about the contest. I believe you are also able to monitor the CNBC blogs that they have running. If they are asking me how well the blogs are working, I assume that they will be asking you too if they feel like it.

It is not my job to be a support service for your whims about a contest.

There is nothing I can do about how the contest works and when people are told what.


I am, obviously, not allowed to inform you in advance of a show what is going on in that show. Get real.

You quoted some conversation I had that was responsive to an inquery by another person to me. Get real.

I am a ringer with regard to CNBC and its productions.

 

[taowave]

Quote from Spydertrader:

Lighten up Francis.

That is one of my favorite movies....