POLL: Do you think Stormfront has infiltrated EliteTrader's Political Forum?

Do you think Stormfront has infiltrated EliteTrader's Political Forum?

  • Yes

    Votes: 42 47.7%

  • No

    Votes: 46 52.3%
  • Total voters
    88
Quote from IShopAtPublix:

You read what you want to read. My positions are nuanced. Many pages ago in this thread I referenced the "Swiss way" as a possibility. Which you get to buy a shotgun for protection but concealed permits are almost impossible to get.

NRA does not want gun registration, they want purchasers of guns to experience as little hassle as possible. Now why would somebody need 2 semi automatics as Virginia Tech shooter purchased? Why not 50?

Gun production needs to be strictly controlled, gun registration programs need to be in place and people should only be able to buy shotguns/rifles for home protection/recreation. Period.

I don't like things the way virginia, florida, texas do things. Rules concerning firearms need to be strict and uniform across the country.

The way it is now, anyone can purchase anything through regular channels by using a strawman. Our safety gets subjugated to the needs of NRA, gun shows, gun makers.
More...

Now we're closer to being on the same page. I have no problem with gun control laws that allow lawful citizens access to firearms while at the same time restricting circumvention. A little encumbrance to insure that responsible people of good character own these weapons is tolerable. Even laws which curtail the number of firearms bought within a certain reasonable period of time to prevent crimes of passion or pre-meditation.

As I have stated many times, reasonable gun control is appropriate. NRA's position is that one must fight the inch lest you lose the mile. In some respects they are correct all things considered. Though, unfettered gun ownership is unreasonable.

I own a number of firearms. Do I need them all? No. But that's not relevant. Am I responsible with them? Yes. Have I used them for defense? Yes, but only in the form of brandishing. I have no desire to take a life. Would rather not even wound someone. But if it comes to that, and I hope it never does, I will respond accordingly.
 
This thread has outperformed my expectations. More people participated in the poll than I expected, aliases notwithstanding, and several Stormfront troopers have come out of the woodwork and into the light for everyone to see. Further, a fair number of respondents share my view that one or more hate groups have a contingent in our midst. The rest is gravy.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

This thread has outperformed my expectations. More people participated in the poll than I expected, aliases notwithstanding, and several Stormfront troopers have come out of the woodwork and into the light for everyone to see. Further, a fair number of respondents share my view that one or more hate groups have a contingent in our midst. The rest is gravy.
More...

Trust me, headlines from whitecivilrights.com and stormfront.org as well as topics brought up on talk radio make a regular showing here.
 
Mag is a product of cognitive dissonance.

His greatest enemy ( the Jews) has outperformed him at every turn, and he is upset over that. Why do some of them live in mansions and he live in a trailer park?

It's not fair.

So, like most poor people who are not smart enough to get out on their own, they have to blame someone. The banks, the NWO, the niggers, the spics, the Jews, SOMEBODY is responsible for why he lives in a trailer park.

If fact were presented, cognitive dissonance would tell him it was garbage.

This type of human is mentally ill, proceed at your own risk.
 
Well using the term "Negrow" which is a delibrate misspelling of the disparaging term "negro" and "obongo" for Obama gives away your feelings and position concerning Black people.

It's one thing to state statistical facts to underscore your argument.

A lot of what you say has merit and I can overlook your commentary of some of the facts that you present. But, using disparaging racial terms undermines your position since rather than appearing as someone who is interested in the facts for facts sake, you look like you're interested in the facts to support and justify a hatred.

That's what makes you lose credibility.

If a scientist comes to me and says that he has concluded through experimentation that Blacks are deficient in certain areas because of x,y,z, I'd be interested in what he has to say. If he subsequently adds disparaging remarks about Blacks, he discredits his research since now it looks like his research is biased. I'd take a look at his research again if it survived peer review.
 
Quote from Z.O.G.:

... Or is free speech only acceptable if you, the media, and the government happen to agree with it?...
More...

Bingo!

All other speech is racist hate speech.

:D
 
Quote from Z.O.G.:

And I'm not sure why you clowns have a problem with Stormfront or White Civil Rights or any other...
More...
Thank you for tipping your hand again and again. We get it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top