POLL: Do you think Stormfront has infiltrated EliteTrader's Political Forum?

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Z.O.G.:

Hey, IShitAtPublix, I hear that over in China there are an endless list of economic, political, and social organizations that have nothing but Chinese people in them! :eek:

When are you going to go over to China and tell them that they are "racist" and "segregationist"? How come we don't hear you saying one word about all this injustice and social evil going on in China?

China is a third world country with communist party ruling it. Any backwardness is par for the course. But even more importantly, it is a sovereign nation and I don't believe in telling other nations how to live. I live in US and US problems are my problems.


P.S Thanks again for illustrating your lack of logic.

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Z.O.G.:

Ah, and here we go. White people don't really exist as a group, and therefore they can't possibly have any racial or ethnic group interests because they don't even exist in the first place.

You're so brainwashed with Boasian cultural anthropology bullshit that you don't even know which end is up.

:eek: :eek: :eek:

Cultural Anthropology suggests that a society of shamans, warlords as well as cargo cults and a trinket based economy is just as good as any developed nation. That is a bs belief.
Making sure people are not exploited is not the same as saying backward nations are just as good as developed ones. You don't know diddly squat about cultural anthropology (and anything else really).

 

[Pa(b)st Prime]

Quote from IShopAtPublix:

Cultural Anthropology suggests that a society of shamans, warlords as well as cargo cults and a trinket based economy is just as good as any developed nation. That is a bs belief.
Making sure people are not exploited is not the same as saying backward nations are just as good as developed ones. You don't know diddly squat about cultural anthropology (and anything else really).

Honestly Z.O.G. facing you. Your mistake with the James Madison rant was inexcusable. Madison at one time owned 100 slaves. Unless of course you were referring to Madison's multi cultural instincts when he said, "“treat the Negroes with all the humanity and kindness consistent with their necessary subordination and work.”

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Honestly Z.O.G. facing you. Your mistake with the James Madison rant was inexcusable. Madison at one time owned 100 slaves. Unless of course you were referring to Madison's multi cultural instincts when he said, "“treat the Negroes with all the humanity and kindness consistent with their necessary subordination and work.”

No mistake on my part. Madison owned slaves, as did Washington, Jefferson even impregnated his slave. Summarizing abstractly: Madison believed it was important to the welfare of the state to protect minorities

The point is, the generic concept of a protection of a minority is not new. Treating blacks as human beings maybe new to some (and would be new to people of the early 19th century)

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Z.O.G.:

Well, now, that's a nice vague indeterminate phrase, isn't it? "Making sure people are not exploited" LOL Exactly what in the hell does that mean? Whatever you want it to mean, that's what.

This is just like the terms "racism", "hate", "anti-Semitism" and all the other pseudo-terms created by Jewish Communists like Leon Trotsky and the Jewish Marxist "intellectuals" at the Frankfurt School for Social Research. These terms mean whatever the cultural Marxists want them to mean, and the meaning changes from year to year, depending on the circumstances.

Not exploiting? I don't know. Not taking them as slaves, not defrauding them out of material possessions, not exterminating them or driving them from their lands...

What is pseudo about racism and anti semitism? This is not restless leg syndrom we are talking about.

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Z.O.G.:

-Political minority

-Racial minority

You still don't get the difference, do you?

They are interrelated. Jim Crow laws and slavery made those two things one and the same.

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Z.O.G.:

Blacks in the United States are treated as MORE than human beings, I can assure you. To wit: sixty years of subsidized housing, welfare, food stamps, affirmative action in employment, hiring, and school admissions, anti-discrimination laws, "civil rights" laws, "equal employment opportunity" laws, "equal housing" laws, "equal credit" laws. If all this doesn't qualify as "equal treatment", then I don't know what the hell does. In fact, this is not even equal treatment. It is decidedly unequal treatment.

You cannot turn a black African into a white European, no matter how hard you try. You can spend all the money that you want - hundreds of billions, even trillions of dollars, but it won't magically transform a black man into a white man. Marxist white liberals just don't seem to understand that.

All the programs you mentioned are to compensate for previous wrongs. Had some white europeans not being extremely lazy, none of this would be necessary.

What exactly constitutes a white european? I want to hear what magical qualities are unattainable for a black no matter the education.

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Z.O.G.:

1. How long until the "previous wrongs" are righted? How many decades or centuries will this take? Or are these government social programs going to continue indefinitely? Let me know.

2. Can you transform a black African into a white European? Answer the question - Yes or no.

1. Sandra Day O'Connor talked about the standard. I would say considering who the president is right now, not longer than 2050.

2. Don't answer the question with a question. I asked you first, what is so special about a white european that a black cannot attain it. The difference has to be more than pale skin.

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Z.O.G.:

The year 2050. Thanks for giving us a definite date. LOL

Can you transform a black African into a white European? Answer the question - Yes or no.

Still waiting for your book-length response to this question.

There is no such thing as white european. That can be understood implicity by anyone who studied European history.All the little (and not so little) nations resist unification(never ending warfare is conclusive proof of that). A russian will have very little in common in mentality with a british or a french or a german or an italian, etc. The unity of a white race is an aritficial concept created by the likes of david duke to counter the perceived "grouping" of black race.

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from Z.O.G.:

There is no such thing as a black African. That can be understood implicitly by anyone who studied African history. All the little (and not so little) nations resist unification(never ending warfare is conclusive proof of that). A Nigerian will have very little in common in mentality with a Somalian or a Rwandan or a Liberian or a Namibian, etc. The unity of a black race is an artificial concept created by the likes of jesse jackson to counter the perceived "grouping" of white race.

Sophomoric humor. It is rather interesting how a negative exclusion of one's group leads to group identity. When the law and the establishment treats you the same in a negative way regardless of where you came from (which part of africa) you develop a collective identity.

You still have not answered what makes a white european something a black cannot attain. And you will not answer it because it would be fatal to your argument.