POLL: Are Republicans desperately afraid that the Obama administration might succeed?

Are Republicans desperately afraid that the Obama administration might succeed?

  • Yes

    Votes: 31 60.8%
  • No

    Votes: 20 39.2%

  • Total voters
    51
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

Jekuluss is getting full on rope-a doped in this thread. I almost have as much sympathy watching him getting his ass beat as I did George Foreman when he first got rope-a-doped by Ali in Ziare.

Almost.

Hey genius, where exactly did I get my ass beat is the question?
 
Well Junior I don't claim to read every thread but it sure does seem like a pattern with you.

Quote from drjekyllus:

Hey genius, where exactly did I get my ass beat is the question?
 
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

Jekuluss is getting full on rope-a doped in this thread. I almost have as much sympathy watching him getting his ass beat as I did George Foreman when he first got rope-a-doped by Ali in Ziare.

Almost.

Ahemm...........In the spirit of fair and balanced.....as regards the socialist spelling attack tag team [S.S.A.T.T]:


Ziare = Zaire
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

I get the sense that Republicans, especially those in this forum, are actually fearful that the current administration might succeed in pulling the country out of the quagmire left by the previous administration. Fearful, perhaps, that they just might have been wrong all this time and in so many ways. Does anyone else smell this pungent Republican fear fest? This desperation and furious grasping at straws in a futile and laughable attempt at political self-preservation?

You write as if you have never seen a transition of power among political parties.
 
Quote from NeoRio1:

You write as if you have never seen a transition of power among political parties.
Whereas you, and others like you, write as if you have never acknowledged the transition of power between political parties.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Whereas you, and others like you, write as if you have never acknowledged the transition of power between political parties.

Yeah because dems where so gracious when the Presidency transitioned from Clinton to Bush. Talk about the pot and kettle.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Whereas you, and others like you, write as if you have never acknowledged the transition of power between political parties.

+1

He and others here are still trying to come to terms that the GOP got their asses kicked in the mid-term election in 2006.

They are also trying to come to terms that the GOP put an elderly candidate up for the Presidential election who admittedly knew very little about Economics; during an economic contraction the likes that this country hasn't seen since the 1930's.

Add a VP candidate that was a mere political "gimmick" and you have a party (the GOP) that is in total upheaval.

Like I said before, I was a registered Republican for 28 years. The Party left me with their doubling of the national debt under Bush and the spend, spend, spend attitude with nary a veto.

Gary Sinese of CSI anyone?
:D
 
Quote from Landis82:

+1

He and others here are still trying to come to terms that the GOP got their asses kicked in the mid-term election in 2006.

They are also trying to come to terms that the GOP put an elderly candidate up for the Presidential election who admittedly knew very little about Economics; during an economic contraction the likes that this country hasn't seen since the 1930's.

Add a VP candidate that was a mere political "gimmick" and you have a party (the GOP) that is in total upheaval.

Like I said before, I was a registered Republican for 28 years. The Party left me with their doubling of the national debt under Bush and the spend, spend, spend attitude with nary a veto.

Gary Sinese of CSI anyone?
:D

I believe everyone should be hoping that the GOP succeeds in becoming viable again.

One party who ends up in permanent power is bad - arrogance and corruption is not exclusive to any 1 party.

The problem the GOP has now is with the "viable" part. The party is pursuing the Limbaugh method now to regain that. Will he be successful or set the party back?

Wait for 2010. Then either Limbaugh will take indisputable control because he is correct, or he and his supporters will be guilty of hamstringing the GOP.

What we may need is a viable 3rd party then.
 
Quote from WaveStrider:

I believe everyone should be hoping that the GOP succeeds in becoming viable again.

One party who ends up in permanent power is bad - arrogance and corruption is not exclusive to any 1 party.

The problem the GOP has now is with the "viable" part. The party is pursuing the Limbaugh method now to regain that. Will he be successful or set the party back?

Wait for 2010. Then either Limbaugh will take indisputable control because he is correct, or he and his supporters will be guilty of hamstringing the GOP.

What we may need is a viable 3rd party then.

Well we have two elections this year for Governor of New jersey and Virgina. At the current time both are held by democrats. Right now, the money is on both of them to be won by Republicans. The Republican brand is damaged but the funeral the dems are planning is premature.
 
Quote from Landis82:

Dude, you really need to take an English As A Second Language Course.

I know 8th graders that have a much better command of English grammar and spelling than you.

:D

Typos pal.

So says the Czechoslovakian that isn't even an American citizen.

Not a typo genius.
 
Back
Top