I think so, but maybe that's just me.
I keep seeing references to the use of Fibonacci numbers in trading. However, I think that people who use these numbers or ratios are misguided. First, I don't think markets are preordained to coincide with a number sequence that supposedly explains much of the universe as we know it. That's just a tad too mystical for my taste. Second, there appears to be no lack of Fib numbers or ratios to latch onto, such that if one fails there is always another and another and so on. This effectively renders it meaningless irrespective of the prior argument. Third, if used as intended, it is essentially a predictive tool rather than a reactive one. And we all know what happens when we choose to distinguish ourselves by predicting the markets.
But, as I noted at the outset, that's just my opinion. So please vote and share your views.
I keep seeing references to the use of Fibonacci numbers in trading. However, I think that people who use these numbers or ratios are misguided. First, I don't think markets are preordained to coincide with a number sequence that supposedly explains much of the universe as we know it. That's just a tad too mystical for my taste. Second, there appears to be no lack of Fib numbers or ratios to latch onto, such that if one fails there is always another and another and so on. This effectively renders it meaningless irrespective of the prior argument. Third, if used as intended, it is essentially a predictive tool rather than a reactive one. And we all know what happens when we choose to distinguish ourselves by predicting the markets.
But, as I noted at the outset, that's just my opinion. So please vote and share your views.
