Politics That Work

[fhl]

Bush had Hastert as Speaker for most of his Presidency yet he couldn't create as many jobs as The Democrat Clinton could with a Republican Speaker.

You can try to discredit Obama as much as you want but more jobs were certainly created under him than his Republican predecessor.

If Bush had a fed that kept interest rates at zero forever and bought three trillion dollars worth of bonds, his admin would have looked quite different. And if a fed hadn't been propping up Obama, his would look quite different, too.
And half of Obama's jobs were derived from a model.

 

[fhl]

Your source shows more jobs are created under democrats.Thanks for the link.

Why did you leave out the 19 million or seven million jobs created under Clinton and Obama and net job losses under W Bush?

It should be obvious that something is very wrong with these numbers by virtue of the fact that they show FDR as a big job creator. Ever heard of something called the Great Depression?

 

[Tony Stark]

So how come after 8 years of Obama things are so shitty and people are pissed off?

So pissed off that the favorite to win The White House is basically running as Obama's third term?So pissed off that Obama's approval rating is among the highest compared to other presidents their last few months in office?

 

[fhl]

So pissed off that the favorite to win The White House is basically running as Obama's third term?So pissed off that Obama's approval rating is among the highest compared to other presidents their last few months in office?

You're kidding. Your analysis of the 'polls' doesn't show that people are pissed off?
You almost had me convinced that you were another Nate Silver. Now you blew it!

 

[Tony Stark]

You're kidding. Your analysis of the 'polls' doesn't show that people are pissed off?
You almost had me convinced that you were another Nate Silver. Now you blew it!

1.If people were so pissed off why is the candidate running as his third term the favorite to win the race?


2.

 

[fhl]

1.If people were so pissed off why is the candidate running as his third term the favorite to win the race?


2.

Selective use of polls. You just found a poll about one certain area and run with it.

Americans Are Really Unhappy About Everything, Poll Says | TIME
time.com/4283710/donald-trump-poll-quinnipiac/Time
Apr 6, 2016

 

[Tony Stark]

You're kidding. Your analysis of the 'polls' doesn't show that people are pissed off?

Pissed off is the end of the bush presidency,which lead to Obama winning by 7 points and 192 electoral votes.

 

[Tony Stark]

Selective use of polls. You just found a poll about one certain area and run with it.

Americans Are Really Unhappy About Everything, Poll Says | TIME
time.com/4283710/donald-trump-poll-quinnipiac/Time
Apr 6, 2016

If that were true the candidate running as his third term wouldn't have a shot.

 

[fhl]

If that were true the candidate running as his third term wouldn't have a shot.

Except for one small detail. She's not running for third term.

Adviser: Clinton not running for Obama's third term | TheHill
thehill.com/.../289429-adviser-clinton-not-running-for-obamas-third-termThe Hill
Jul 27, 2016

 

[WeToddDid2]

Apparently, you and the people of that website do not understand that there are time lags in economics.

Looks like to me that the repubs are have to clean up the mess libtards make and the libtards are beneficiaries of the economic policies of the repubs.

Furthermore, the above info is extremely misleading. For example, Clinton was the beneficiary of a tech bubble. He did absolutely nothing to cause the tech bubble. The bubble burst as he left office but you didn't hear Bush running around blaming Clinton and talking about the mess he inherited. Just like Bush and the repubs had absolutely nothing to do with the housing bubble. Also, he had a repub house and senate.

As someone else pointed out, everyone knows that economy was terrible under Carter and Regan had to clean it up.