Politics That Work

[jem]

those charts are fraudulent.
Reagan Created 13 million jobs.
so I have no idea how they show reagan bush being lower than carter's 8 million.

So sort of magical unicorn leftist lie about the economy again.


http://www.truthfulpolitics.com/htt...-s-job-creation-by-president-political-party/

8,895 Lyndon B. Johnson Democrat
5,254 Richard Nixon Republican
2,235 Gerald Ford Republican
8,601 Jimmy Carter Democrat
13,621 Ronald Reagan Republican
1,084 George H. W. Bush Republican

 

[fhl]

Should have known. Chart is a fraud. As Jem showed.
Carter's stagflation better than Reagan. That's a hoot.

 

[Arnie]

So how come after 8 years of Obama things are so shitty and people are pissed off?

 

[Covertibility]

So how come after 8 years of Obama things are so shitty and people are pissed off?

Like the deplorables? If your kind are not in the top tax bracket, why do you vote republican?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

You pick and choose here

Seems like you do as well.

 

[Tony Stark]

those charts are fraudulent.
Reagan Created 13 million jobs.
so I have no idea how they show reagan bush being lower than carter's 8 million.

So sort of magical unicorn leftist lie about the economy again.
http://www.truthfulpolitics.com/htt...-s-job-creation-by-president-political-party/

8,895 Lyndon B. Johnson Democrat
5,254 Richard Nixon Republican
2,235 Gerald Ford Republican
8,601 Jimmy Carter Democrat
13,621 Ronald Reagan Republican
1,084 George H. W. Bush Republican

Your source shows more jobs are created under democrats.Thanks for the link.

Why did you leave out the 19 million or seven million jobs created under Clinton and Obama and net job losses under W Bush?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

those charts are fraudulent.

Sure, bro, like climate change and evolution.

So sort of magical unicorn leftist lie about the economy again.

No, you have that covered with "supply side."

 

[Frederick Foresight]

So how come...things are so shitty and people are pissed off?

Gee, I don't know, Arnie, why are things so shitty for you and why are you pissed off?

 

[jem]

because I was pointing out how fraudulent the the chart was.

additionally, many of those clinton jobs were created by the gingrich run republican congress. and Obama's jobs are not real jobs they are statistical and McJobs.

look it up.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-22/fake-jobs-plague-us-economy

John Williams of Shadow Government Statistics has parsed the BLS numbers carefully. He reports that the BLS inflates its monthly account of new hires with approximately 200,000 fake jobs, including jobs conjured up by its so-called “Birth/Death Model” that are meant to account for new employment in startup companies that are too new to count.

Notwithstanding the fact that the BLS has been adding an average of 200,000 fake jobs to the monthly payroll report in recent years (as confirmed by the March 2015 benchmark downside revisions that subtracted 206,000 jobs), the actual employment picture has become so weak that they have brazenly added additional monthly upside biases.

That’s why Donald Trump says: “Only ‘dummies’ believe Fed’s unemployment figure.”

Your source shows more jobs are created under democrats.Thanks for the link.

Why did you leave out the 19 million or seven million jobs created under Clinton and Obama and net job losses under W Bush?

 

[Tony Stark]

because I was pointing out how fraudulent the the chart was.

additionally, many of those clinton jobs were created by the gingrich run republican congress. and Obama's jobs are not real jobs they are statistical and McJobs.

Bush had Hastert as Speaker for most of his Presidency yet he couldn't create as many jobs as The Democrat Clinton could with a Republican Speaker.

You can try to discredit Obama as much as you want but more jobs were certainly created under him than his Republican predecessor.