Police Lied -- Mike Brown Was Killed 148 Feet Away from Darren Wilson's SUV

kut2k2 said:
Most cops are lousy shots. Why do you think there are so many reports where the cops shot 30 times but only 9 bullets hit the suspect? That's a bit of an exaggeration but not much. If Darren Wilson was so terrified of Brown that he felt compelled to compare himself to a small child facing Hulk Hogan, that would explain a lot including his lousy aim. Given the givens, maybe Wilson was just a lousy cop in general. This traffic stop would have been handled very differently by a truly competent and professional cop.
More...

Seems Dickhead can't make a distinction between "shot" and "shot at".

This does not surprise me. Too much time spent at "examiner.com".
 
quibbaileydeath.jpg
 
dbphoenix said:
Seems Dickhead can't make a distinction between "shot" and "shot at".

This does not surprise me. Too much time spent at "examiner.com".
More...


What's with your obsession with examiner.com? I cited a single article months ago.

I understand you hate to be proven wrong time and time again.

And last, multiple witnesses stated on the record Brown was shot in the back. Reading comprehension isn't a strong suit of yours I see. You are beyond stupid.

From one of your liberal sites (MSNBC) and the esteemed Al Sharpton:

“Keep running, bro!,” he said Brown yelled. Then Brown yelled it a second time. Those would be the last words Johnson’s friend, “Big Mike,” would ever say to him.

Brown made it past the third car. Then, “blam!” the officer took his second shot, striking Brown in the back.

How come 2 or 3 autopsies stated the bullets entered from the front?

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/eyewitness-michael-brown-fatal-shooting-missouri

So rather than listen to lies we should prosecute these thugs for perjury.

Rudy Giuliani: Go After Those Who Testified Brown 'Shot in B

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/ferguson-witnesses-michael-brown-darren-wilson/2014/11/26/id/609689/
 
dbphoenix said:
I guess Dickhead doesn't have me on Ignore after all. ;)
More...

No I take you off every now and then to see how much more stupid and non-factual your posts can get.

Glad to see you refused to respond to my factual post. Buy why reply when you only dig the hole deeper?
 
DHOHHI said:
No I take you off every now and then to see how much more stupid and non-factual your posts can get.

Glad to see you refused to respond to my factual post. Buy why reply when you only dig the hole deeper?
More...

Your "factual" post of witnesses' testimony? If it's "factual", why do they not all agree?

Do you not have any idea what a "fact" is?
 
dbphoenix said:
Your "factual" post of witnesses' testimony? If it's "factual", why do they not all agree?

Do you not have any idea what a "fact" is?
More...

They don't all agree because some of them LIED .. comprehendo? Brown was NOT shot in the back. Geez ....
 
DHOHHI said:
They don't all agree because some of them LIED .. comprehendo? Brown was NOT shot in the back. Geez ....
More...

Which has zip to do with my comment that you don't know the difference between "shot" and "shot at".

Wanna try again? Maybe you can get it right this time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top